KenH's New Original Ron Paul for President Thread

[Petra-O IX]

The question of blame is not about who did it, but rather about what was behind the decision making of those who did it.

I think this is the kind of parsing that is illegitimate.

First, you missed the question. My question was, "Why doesn't Paul say ..." I was curious as to why he says it the way he does. You didn't answer that. Second, the "why" is about blame. In trying to find out why people think the way they do, we are looking for reasons why they do things. That is typically called blame.

Don't be. I'm not.

I'm not prejudiced against him.

Nope. He doesn't frustrate me at all. I don't even think about him.

I guess the bottom line Pastor Larry is that you need to exercise your mind by asking questions over and over again that have been given satisfactory answers to or you just enjoy trolling a lot.

 

[Pastor Larry]

I really do not think Ron Paul should be of major concern to you Pastor Larry. No doubt, on the night of November 4th, we will all hear announced on every news outlet, "And Michigan's electoral votes are awarded to Hillary Clinton."

Probably ... And unfortunately. But by that standard, Ron Paul should not be of concern to anyone anywhere since on election night, it is like that we will not hear any electoral votes awarded to Ron Paul.

 

[Pastor Larry]

I guess the bottom line Pastor Larry is that you need to exercise your mind by asking questions over and over again that have been given satisfactory answers to or you just enjoy trolling a lot.

I have not seen any satisfactory answers given to this question. Until I read a few posts here today, I had never really given it much thought. I have not previously read these Ron Paul for president threads, and I don't think about him all that much. But I wondered about the answer to the question.

My mind gets plenty of exercise, mostly in theology and ancient languages, not so much in politics.

If you are offended by someone who doesn't know something and takes the time to ask about it, then I suppose you are the one with the problem. As for me, when I don't know something I want to know, I ask. You still, for all your words, haven't given a very satisfactory answer, but perhaps that may be because you don't actually have one, but do have a need to defend Ron Paul. I don't know.

If Ron Paul says that America needs to take some of the responsibility for the way the world views us and feeds the negative views that people have of America, I actually agree with him. That doesn't justify their violent responses, and it may well be that America's intentions and actions in certain places are worth the cost, but I think we should acknowledge that these guys did not attack America out of a vacuum.

In other words, I think I tend to agree with Ron Paul on this particular issue.

 

[poncho]

Probably ... And unfortunately. But by that standard, Ron Paul should not be of concern to anyone anywhere since on election night, it is like that we will not hear any electoral votes awarded to Ron Paul.

Ron Paul doesn't need to be elected. Thats the beauty of it. The R[3VOL]UTION of the awakening mind has already begun. The next potus appointed by transnational special interests will have to deal with a population of US citizens already aware that he/she isn't there to protect and defend the US but to drag it down and merge it with some supranational government body of self appointed control freak "official global authorities".

The Americam revolution only had about 3-5% of the colonist's involved in the begining, as time went on and the tyranny imposed by the crown became more apparent their numbers grew. The tyranny being imposed on us now by "transnational authorities" will become even more apparent in time and our numbers will grow. This is just the begining of the second American revolution.