Re-read the part I quoted. How/why would Clinton get McConnell's Senate seat? It makes zero sense.
If you must know,I was merely replying to the post by [If I'm not mistaken it was by John Deere Fan....post #6.].
It seems that J.D.F. isn't exactly KY's US Senator Mitch McConnell's Number One fan--and for good reason. Seems old Mitch would rather spend time with our current Democrat POTUS than work on the budget that our socialist commander-in-chief has sent to the other end of PA Ave.
If the past is any prediction of the future, then I predict that there will not be any really substantial changes. Moreover, since Congress has a deadline of the end of this month (That's when the federal government ends its current fiscal year.), I don't believe that they'll do much to fund much of our nation's transportation infrastructure--namely our crumbling Interstate highway system.
OTOH, I could be surprised....namely if the Congress in its budgetary deliberation actually votes to completely de-fund Planned Parenthood--the single most organization that's guilty of not only killing our nation's babies, but also selling their body parts to the highest bidder.
As far as Hillary actually getting KY's Mitch McConnell's US Senate seat, that's probably not going to happen. OTOH, Hillary did win a US Senate seat in NY state prior to her being appointed Secretary of State by our current POTUS.
And just what exactly qualified her to be a US Senator? My guess--and it's only a guess--is that Obama wanted her to be a US Senator to lure her away from any future runs for POTUS. If that was his intentions, he certainly failed at it.
However, since Hillary's poll numbers are on the decline in the NH polls (NH being the first presidential primary election) as well as in IA (where the first presidential caucus is held, Hillary may not wind up as strongly as many political pundits predicted she would.
Anyway, that's why I posted what I did, okay Bro. I.T.L.? :wavey: