Featured LA Police on Tactical Alert After Cop Car Fired Upon ....

This just in .... I looks like the "What do you want? Dead cops!" insanity is spreading. Two cops on patrol in Los angeles were shot at in their car. One man was captured, the other is on the run and considered armed and dangerous!

http://abc7.com/news/lapd-declares-...-after-2-suspects-fire-at-patrol-car-/453702/

 

The early reports are the the cops were white. Since it was in the Watts part of town it can be presumed the suspect was black. But since no one was killed, this was a victory for the cops.

 

It sure seems to be gang related. And you are correct! They get the police, especially white cop, to be more timid and second guessing everything they do, especially if it means use of weapons, more cops will die, because they lose the edge.

Obama is privately rejoicing with all the division he has stirred up since Brown's killing. One more area he has brought change to. He has severely weakened the military and does not support them any more than he does cops, and with the men and women sworn to enforce laws and protect the public being second guessed and looked at as baby killers, which turns a minority group against those who uphold the laws.

We are weaker now than ever before. What a shame direction for the greatest nation to be heading in.:tear:

 

From the link below, here are two statements, that suggest, it may be gang related. Besides I never said it was .... kind sir .... I said, and I quote, "It sure seems to be gang related."

Now let's see if I can help you to put the two together? First. I know the area . well, and it was Watts, and there is heavy gang activity there. Second I made that comment well after the initial post, and that was based upon an updated television news report. Third. The cops pretty much believe it as a gang, because of the increased gang related shooting in that particular six-block area of LA! Finally. I did what most people who report news do, I took a leap of faith and made a deduction based on the evidence I provided to you in items 1-3. That, kind sir, is what writers refer to as "literary or creative license." [http://dictionary.reverso.net/english-cobuild/literary license]

** If you choose to not believe this, fine. When the final report comes out, I'll send you the link. If I am wrong I'll be the first to apologize to you. That is far much better than I can expect to recieve from you should you be proven wrong, right?

"Police have not yet determined a motive for Sunday night's shooting in South Los Angeles — an area plagued by gang violence — but said there were no indications it was linked to other attacks on police in the country." and "Chief Charlie Beck said at a news conference Monday that he was concerned that people might be targeting officers but added that the neighborhood had been marred by gang violence during the past several months and there had been a significant number of gang shootings."

See link: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2014/12/29/us/ap-us-police-shots-fired.html?_r=0

Now yall have yourself a good day!
And yall come on back real soon. Ya hear me?​

 

Nothing I've said, with the creative license, is any dumber or stupid or assuming than all the propaganda you preach, day after day, on racial relations pertaining to the Ferguson and New York fiasco. You seem to have bought into the "Don't shoot, hands up" thing as if it were factual, even after a Grand Jury said it wasn't that way!

So, once again, you are pointing fingers at another for something you do all the time without even thinking about it!

As for it being a gang related shooting, the one guy caught is a gang member, here is the offical link - http://www.dailynews.com/general-ne...-with-shooting-at-lapd-patrol-car-in-south-la

I hope you are man enough to apologize for all the assumptions and accusations you lodged in my directon over my use of Creative License? :type:

 

Wipe you tears on this, laughing boy - http://www.dailynews.com/general-ne...-with-shooting-at-lapd-patrol-car-in-south-la

As for your defintion of creative license, let me say .... "whatever!" :smilewinkgrin:

 

Once again the dark side of the light you project has broken through. Such wasted potential just to grind an ax. :smilewinkgrin: Someone needs to LIGHTEN back up, In the Light? :flower: As for seeing things, your continued harassment of me will reveal the ugly side of your light. So we'll watch and see who sees what. Peace.....

 

Well I sho nuff owes you for setting me straight. Wouldn't know what to do without folk like y'all. :flower: