1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Labor's War on Wal-Mart Costly to the Poor

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by carpro, Jan 26, 2006.

Top Posters
  1. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    http://www.opinionjournal.com/cc/?id=110007871

    Hard Line State
    Big Labor's war on Wal-Mart claims casualties among poor Marylanders.

    BY STEVE H. HANKE AND STEPHEN J.K. WALTERS

    EXCERPT

    Unfortunately, in Somerset, the new law looks more like a body blow than a "swipe." The rural county is Maryland's poorest, with per capita personal income 46% below the state average and a poverty rate 130% above it. Somerset's enduring problem is weak labor demand that greatly limits its 25,250 residents' economic opportunities.
    There are just 0.8 jobs per household in Somerset, barely half the 1.5 figure that applies to the rest of the state. Somerset's top 10 list of employers features sectors like food services (average annual compensation per employee: $9,637), poultry and egg production ($14,320) and seafood preparation and packaging ($19,190).

    It is hard to exaggerate how much the planned distribution center might have meant to Somerset's economy. Using an input-output model, we forecast the "ripple effects" of the new income and spending that could have emanated from Wal-Mart's facility as follows:

    • The center's 800 employees would have created an additional 282 jobs among "upstream" suppliers and "downstream" retailers and service establishments; all told, the center would have boosted county employment by 14% and private-sector employment by 20%.

    • Total annual employee compensation in Somerset would have risen by $46.5 million, or 19%.

    • Annual output (or "gross county product") would have risen by $128.3 million, or 19%.

    • State and local tax receipts would have increased by $19.2 million annually; this would include $8.5 million in property taxes, $5.6 million in sales taxes, and $1.4 million in personal income taxes.

    Those losses, though dramatic, probably understate the full extent of the damage in this case. They do not include forgone employment and income from construction of the facility and related infrastructure improvements. What is more, Wal-Mart's tentative plans for a second distribution center in Garrett County, in mountainous western Maryland, also appear dead. Garrett, with a poverty rate that is 70% above the state's, is only slightly better off than Somerset.
     
    #1 carpro, Jan 26, 2006
  2. elijah_lives

    elijah_lives New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    0
    Excellent article in today's Wall Street Journal. This misguided attempt by labor unions and vote-buying politicians has cost Maryland hundreds of jobs, with more in the pipeline. Would you want to plant a business in such a nasty environment? Not me. I used to live in Indian Head, MD (EOD School), and deliberately moved to and commuted from Virginia, rather than support the State of Maryland.

    Those counties are out in the cold, now.
     
    #2 elijah_lives, Jan 26, 2006
  3. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    Sadly these poor people will probably blame it all on President Bush. Perhaps the Bush Bashers on this Forum will also do so.
     
    #3 OldRegular, Jan 26, 2006
  4. StraightAndNarrow

    StraightAndNarrow Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Messages:
    2,508
    Likes Received:
    3
    Actually, I blame it on the unions. There was a time in the U.S. when unions served a useful purpose. This was back when there really were management abuses and laborers had to work in unsafe conditions. Now, unions are an anachurism. They strangle companies and make the U.S. unconpetitive in the world. Union employees regularly get better treatment than low level management people for benefits, layoffs, and pensions.

    I think most unions should be busted with the exception of unions representing hazardous jobs like coal mining.
     
    #4 StraightAndNarrow, Jan 26, 2006
  5. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,071
    Likes Received:
    1,651
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This situation in Maryland is a good example of why federalism is so important.
     
    #5 KenH, Jan 26, 2006
  6. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    How so?

    I think I understand, but please tell me what you are referring to in particular.
     
    #6 carpro, Jan 26, 2006
  7. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,071
    Likes Received:
    1,651
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Just because one State passes a law that may be harmful to it at least the harm is restricted to that State.
     
    #7 KenH, Jan 26, 2006
  8. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    OK

    That's what I thought you meant. Unfortunately there are 33 other states with similar bills in the works. :(
     
    #8 carpro, Jan 27, 2006
  9. elijah_lives

    elijah_lives New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    0
    Including businesses down to 1,000 employees.
     
    #9 elijah_lives, Jan 27, 2006
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Loading...