MacArthur's 2nd distinctive of LS

MacArthur is dead on on this point. I would counter that easy believism teaches a "faithless" salvation that frustrates God's purpose in regeneration and conversion.

 

Anything short of total surrender to the Lordship of Jesus Christ is rebellion against Jesus Christ

Thats why Scripture gives us 1John 1:9----disobeying what Scripture says of Lordship is seen as unrighteousness in the eyes of God----confession of that particular sin brings the cleansing that Scripture speaks of

 

The biggest thing is a matter of semantics. In a way we make Jesus Lord of our lives.... in a responsible way.... through works AFTER faith. But we really can't make Jesus anything. What is involved is total surrender. We have to die to self, and trust our Lord and Savior to do in us what we can not do. This gives all glory to God. We are certainly responsible, but without His direct involvement in our lives through Holy Spirit, and His providence, we would be lost.

 

And he calls his opponents "easy believers." That is, he declares belief to be a "work" whereby man attempts to be saved by God in Christ. Let's see what scripture says:

"But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness." Rom 4:5 Here we see that believing is NOT working AND that belief justifies the ungodly -- ungodly in that they are not already regenerated or "born again" with the Holy Spirit living in them. So apparently God justifies the ungodly upon their right belief.

Here's what he says is the gospel call to faith. See if you see works or grace. "the gospel call to faith presupposes that sinners must repent of their sin and yield to Christ's authority." Do those sound like grace or works?

Perhaps we need a better "handle" on what he teaches. "Scripture teaches that the gospel calls sinners to faith joined in oneness with repentance (Acts 2:38; 17:30; 20:21; 2 Pet. 3:9). Repentance is a turning from sin (Acts 3:19; Luke 24:47) that consists not of a human work but of a divinely bestowed grace (Acts 11:18; 2 Tim. 2:25)."

>>The gospel whereby we are justified with God calls for man to believe, repent of self (death to self), and enter into the kingdom. (Acts 2:38, 3:19, 17:10, 20:21, 2Pet 3:9, Luke 24:47)

>>Sanctification (continuing, living salvation) which JM derides "easy believism" for not having, calls for repentance from sins continually and IS often ("there is a sin unto death; I don't say you should pray for it") given by God because one is His child (2Tim 2:25).

This is most certainly true! Belief is evidenced and made substantial (turned into "faith," Heb 11:1) by the gift of the Holy Spirit! And He is not given in a defective way -- it is us to blame for grieving, quenching, and rejecting the Spirit's leadership that causes the appearance of the lack of Lordship.

However, JM has "misdiagnosed" the problem with those who seem to fall away. First, we cannot know the heart of any man. Only God knows. And second, JM would, through his LS impose certain secular behavior on God's children as if they were all one member of the body -- all arms or all legs -- such as pleaseth JM! But just as under Jesus Millennial rule, doing so merely makes it harder to see the hypocrites

JM is merely expanding on the basic teachings of Calvinism but he highlights in dramatic fashion their focus on sanctifying the lives of their flock rather than on how to get them into Jesus flock (salvation).

skypair

 

[FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica]Matthew 7:15-20[/FONT][FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica] 15 "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.


[/FONT] [FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica]1Jo 2:19 - [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica]They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.[/FONT]

 

Uh - context on the two passages? And does this say anything about 'judging' "the heart of man", anywhere in it??

Ed

 

Why all roads lead to Calvinism in the Lordship debate, I truly find interesting.

 

Sure, it is obvious but I will be glad to explain it. In both cases there are those who have made a claim to be of God but were not and the reason was made manifest by their actions.

In the Matthew Passage Christ warns to be careful, to be watchful, to be ready to judge those who come into the church who are making a false claim of being of God and are not but are only there to destroy. That is most certainly a warning from Christ that we must make a judgment of the intent and hearts of others.

In the Peter passage rather than give a future warning it gives an actual example of a real occurrence. These men that left the church were revealed by their actions. "[FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica] for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us;" [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica]again their hearts were judged by their actions. For they made claims to be of God and yet were not.


[/FONT]

 

OK, sorry -- I was generalizing based on Calvinist teacings.

Here's the thing, jd -- repentance of sin is "given" to BELIEVERS, 2Tim 2:25. He is using the concept "unlawfully" in speaking of unbelievers that way. Repentance must come from within the unbeliever unto salvation.

That is the assumption of "Lordship," jd. That we can see if you are "elect" or not. The whole thrust of "Lordship"is the outward appearance.

I willingly acknowledge that we all have some truth. We are all parts of the body and it does not appear yet how it all fits together. :laugh: I actually like JM's theology insofar as SANCTIFICATION is concerned. Christ ought to be our Lord. But that is the "next level" of understanding for the "babe in Christ" who needs "milk" still.

skypair

 

2Tim is a pastoral letter instructing Timothy regarding his congregation in this case. There are believers and unbelievers, but all are there on account of some belief (saving or not) in Christ, right? As such, perhaps it is less conclusive whether God gives repentance as believers from sins (i.e. 2Cor 7:9-11) or whether they needed to repent as unbelievers unto conversion from self (Acts 2:38).

A clearer passage would be 2Pet 3:9 which you offered before. God... "is not willing that any perish but that all should come to repentance." This is a salvation instance of repentance, for sure. God is willing that all should come but all do not come (and apparently can't be 'given' repentance apart from 'coming,' right?). There is something that is outside of God's will affecting the outcome - perish or life - here. And that is repentance necessary from man.

Yet the thrust is the continuance of works/fruit as proof of saving faith according to JM's thesis. But I can tell you that there are many people in church who do works and have good looking fruit by the worship of their own will, Col 2:23, and not through faith in Christ. In so doing, JM is like a doctor looking at symptoms and making a hasty, "unclinical" (unscriptural) diagnosis.

Jusst as we go opposite directions here! :laugh:

Not far at all. But JM expresses and ideal which has been around since the forever -- IDEALLY believers would go on and live "Lordship lives" and unbelievers would never try to act like they had "Lordship lives." Unfortunately, believers who are "off-trajectory" need help, not condemnation with unbelievers AND unbelievers who seem to be living "Lordship lives" need less assurance of salvation and to come to Jesus!

Well, that's answer to prayer for me. :godisgood: I know I tried to put you in the frame of mind of the Corinthians -- I mean, when I studied that to write it up for my prayer group years ago, I said Paul has just lost his temper with these people! I'd never seen him so irate with the church before. "Fools?" I thought Jesus said never call anyone that?? Paul was emphatic, to say the least, about the resurrection unto new life as it pleases God and I let that speak for me, perhaps wrongly.

Anyway, now you know I love you and pray for you and hope we can come to "unity in the knowledge and faith of Christ."

skypair