• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Matt 10:28 does God really "destroy BOTH" Body AND soul in fiery hell??

Status
Not open for further replies.

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
BobRyan said:
As the post above points out - DHK's argument against these Bible texts is of the form "they do not agree with my doctrine so I don't think God means for us to take them as theological statements on doctrine -- they differ with my own if taken as a doctrinal position on what stops when a person dies".

That is shocking enough.

What is even more surprising is that that argument "seems reasonable" to many readers when it is used to defend beliefs they ALREADY hold!

How very instructive for the objective reader!

Bob
What is instructive Bob, is that I have clearly shown that soul sleep is a heretical doctrine. I did so from the very Scripture that you provided. And you are unable to refute. The end result is that you post a post with veiled innuendo and name-calling.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
BobRyan said:
In those comments DHK argues that these texts are NOT meant to convey any doctrine on the subject of what ceases at death for the actualy "person" since doing so would contradict his closely held traditions.

More innuendo Bob. I don't follow man's tradition. It was the SDA that invented their own doctrine just a few years ago. I take my doctrine from the Bible and only the Bible not from tradition. You had better tread lightly here. I don't like to be falsely accused.
The truth of the matter is the thoughts of the princes are his advice to his subjects. But you ignore context. When one goes to prayer to God, he seeks God's counsel (or advice--God's thoughts). Again, the truth of the matter is, you don't like my exposition of the text, can't refute it on a Biblical basis, so restort to calling names instead. When that happens everyone knows that you are defeated and cannot defend the heresy that you seek to defend.

And one has to agree with DHK at least to this extent - to save the man-made tradition of the "immortal soul" and "infinite torture" you really have no choice to but to eisegete these "inserts" about "man giving advice to his fellow man INSTEAD of his thoughts really ceasing". It is just about the only solution you have when clinging to man-made tradition over scripture to that extent.

Again, the name-calling is unwarranted. It only shows defeat on your part.
The text says nothing of torture, Hell, heaven, the resurrection, soul sleep. Again you are reading into it soul sleep just like you would read into the text Purgatory. Right?
If you don't agree with me, fine. But what is wrong with the Bible, that you don't agree with it? I am only the messenger of God. Your problem is with God not with me. So forget about the DHK slander. Take your argument up with God. I have inserted nothing. You insert soul sleep.

 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
BobRyan said:
Suppose for a moment that you come to scripture with the pre-bias that at death "all thoughtful ADVICE given from one person to another ceases. But the very things that do NOT cease for each PERSON that dies is - memory, praise to God, thought etc because the PERSON is immortal not MORTAL at least when it comes to that PART of the person responsible for thought and praise and worshp to God. Suppose you argue that this is the VERY part that CONTINUES after death while admitting that all other things (like building a house or raising kids etc) CEASE".

So then what do you do when you come to a post like this??
Because as your habit is you ignore context. Where in the context is the author speaking of the afterlife--heaven, hell, soul sleep, etc. He is not. He is speaking of belief and trust in the God of Heaven in the here and now. Far better to put your trust in God (now) then to put your trust in princes (now). The after life has nothing to do with it. Why are you bringing philosophical and metaphysical thoughts into this passage when there are none?
Why not simply turn a blind eye to these texts and say 'they are not meant for doctrine"??
Answering that question is left as an exercise for the reader!

Bob
You are the one that must answer the question. Why are you speaking of the metaphysical when the psalmist isn't??
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
BobRyan said:
One may easily respond that BobRyan is not such a person as in the case above that came to these texts listed with a prior-bias against what they teach. So you could easily challenge the idea that I would be so objective so Bible-based as to reject man-made tradition against these scriptures and accept the Bible's clear teaching that the thoughts of a PERSON in fact CEASE at death.

But in my discussion here it appears that Andre is just such a person and he is an example of at least one who did choose the Bible over tradition.
Calling Biblical doctrine man made tradition will get you no where on this forum, Bob, except a possible suspension. I suggest you put a cap on it.
 
The thoughts of a dead person cease at death? Preposterous!

The rich man remembered his brothers, he remembered Lazarus' name and Abraham's.

The thoughts do not cease at death. And that, my friend, is Biblical doctrine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Bob argues from scripture -

However as it turns out - I am still going to have to stick with the Bible even if the mere quote of it appears to debunk your suggestions


No thought activity
Ps 146:2
I will sing praises to my God while I have my being.

3 do not trust in princes, in mortal man, in whom there is no salvation.
4 his spirit departs, he returns to the earth; in that very day his thoughts perish.
5 how blessed is he whose help is the God of Jacob,
Ecclesiasties 9:5-6 they have no activity


Ps 143
3Do not trust in princes,
In mortal man
, in whom there is no salvation.
4His
spirit departs
, he returns to the earth;
In that very day
his thoughts perish.



Isaiah 38
18"For Sheol cannot thank You,
Death
cannot praise You;
Those who go down to the pit cannot hope for Your faithfulness.

19"It is the
living who give thank
s to You, as I do today;
A father tells his sons about Your faithfulness.


HBSM posts a direct contradiction
His Blood Spoke My Name said:
The thoughts of a dead person cease at death? Preposterous!

And then backs it up with a parable where all saints sit in Abraham's lap and Abraham is in sovereign control over all saints and whether or not they will be resurrected.

The rich man remembered his brothers, he remembered Lazarus' name and Abraham's.

The thoughts do not cease at death. And that, my friend, is Biblical doctrine.

Using that technique - we have the parable of the "trees electing a king over them"!!
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
DHK said:
Because as your habit is you ignore context. Where in the context is the author speaking of the afterlife--heaven, hell, soul sleep, etc. He is not.

Wrong - again.

The author clearly contrasts the state of being alive WITH memory and WITH the ability to praise God and WITH the ability to think - vs the state of being dead - and NO LONGER having that ability.

Never does the author say he is speaking of "coming to Christ" or "coming to accept the God of heaven".

DHK

He is speaking of belief and trust in the God of Heaven in the here and now. Far better to put your trust in God (now) then to put your trust in princes (now).

In all example given in these texts the one who IS praising God and then CEASES at death - is ALREADY a child of God- and has ALREADY come to accept the God of the heaven.

As usual - you are completely ignoring the context to spin another point into it.

You must answer the question - why are you ignoring the context in which these texts are given - as THEY contrast the LIVING state of a PERSON with the dead state of the PERSON and as they show us explicitly what STOPS for the PERSON in the state of death??

Why do you keep ignoring what the texts say?

In Christ,

Bob
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
DHK said:

More innuendo Bob. I don't follow man's tradition. It was the SDA that invented their own doctrine just a few years ago.


Huh??? What limb are you climbing out on now???

I take my doctrine from the Bible and only the Bible not from tradition. You had better tread lightly here. I don't like to be falsely accused.
The truth of the matter is the thoughts of the princes are his advice to his subjects. But you ignore context. When one goes to prayer to God, he seeks God's counsel (or advice--God's thoughts). Again, the truth of the matter is, you don't like my exposition of the text, can't refute it on a Biblical basis, so restort to calling names instead. When that happens everyone knows that you are defeated and cannot defend the heresy that you seek to defend.

Is it your claim that when I observe your position to be endorsed by man-made-tradition but NOT the Bible this is "objectionable" but when you simply slander my position as "heresy" it is NOT objectionable??

The label you are giving is simply pejorative - it conveys no meaning. The term I am using DOES convey meaning - it means that you can not sustain your position from scripture - that in fact it relies on tradition to support it

Your use of "heresy" is an argument of the form "we are right because we always say we are right and you mean ol sdas are wrong". IT is the same accusation the RCC made against the Catholic reformers.

As Andre points out on this thread - this is not an "SDA only" argument that I am making.


Again, the name-calling is unwarranted. It only shows defeat on your part.


WhaHUH???!! "Name calling"??

I have not used terms like "liar" etc My model is not to resort to name calling. If you have a quote of me doing it - I will instantly recant and appologize.

Do you actually "have" such a quote???


The text says nothing of torture, Hell, heaven, the resurrection, soul sleep. Again you are reading into it soul sleep just like you would read into the text Purgatory. Right?

Wrong - again.

I said nothing about Purgatory, hell, etc - I what I point out is the "inconvenient details" in the text.

Just when you and others "want to say" that the "VERY THING" that CONTINUES at death is memory, thought, continued worship and praise to God etc (as opposed to child raising, house building, farming etc) -- the BIBLE SAYS that these are the very things that STOP at death.

Obviously.

In Christ,
Bob
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by BobRyan
As the post above points out - DHK's argument against these Bible texts is of the form "they do not agree with my doctrine so I don't think God means for us to take them as theological statements on doctrine -- they differ with my own if taken as a doctrinal position on what stops when a person dies".

That is shocking enough.

What is even more surprising is that that argument "seems reasonable" to many readers when it is used to defend beliefs they ALREADY hold!

How very instructive for the objective reader!

Bob



DHK
What is instructive Bob, is that I have clearly shown that soul sleep is a heretical doctrine. I did so from the very Scripture that you provided. And you are unable to refute. The end result is that you post a post with veiled innuendo and name-calling.

I would like to get "a second opinion" - where in the WORLD did I use "name calling" in the example you just gave from my post????!!

Your response to my post has been to use the term "heresy" and to attack the SDA denomination itself. I am not saying anything about Baptists and I am not labeling your views as heresy sir.

How in the WORLD do you take my position vs YOURS and say that I am the one resorting to name calling???

I am totally missing that one!

In Christ,

Bob
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
DHK said:
Bob I have consistently shown you how you have taken each text that you have used out of its context and twisted it to mean something other than its actual meaning.

Can you point to a case where you have done that "even once" in real life???

DHK

If your only answer is the meaninless rhetoric that you give above with its veiled name-calling

"veiled name-calling"????

What in the world are you talking about???

These are "explicit terms" that I do NOT use in my posts "liar", "Heresy", and "denominational references" (for any post on topics not releated to the RCC)

In Christ,

Bob
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
DHK said:
It is your man-made tradition, Bob, yea, rather heresy that you are trying to defend.

I would argue that a simple post of the texts that contradict your position 'suffice' to point out where you are in error. I have shown that repeatedly.

Calling the post of those texts "heresy" is merely exposing the flaw in your argument to a greater extent.

Admit: the psalm says nothing about the resurrection,

I have explicitly already stated that it does not speak to the resurrection.

Now you need to admit that these texts obviously contrast what DOES happen in the case of the LIVING vs what CEASES at death!!

(Indeed I think you already did that explicitly as well).

DHK
DHK
It is simple statement that as long as he lives he will praise God. With every breathe he will praise God. With every thought that he has as long as he has thoughts (as long as he is alive) he will praise God.

Which means you are simply contradicting what you already admitted to -

"(AS long AS he has thoughts (as long AS he is ALIVE) he will praise God" - the text contrasts the LIVING state with the state of being dead and what CEASES when the dead state is reached!


DHK Why are you reading into this psalm doctrines that are not there? That is what cults do.

so much for the term "veiled"

In any case - I am not so much complaining about the terms you are using - as I am pointing out the contrast between your methods and mine. Those are terms I just don't use when responding to the obvious Biblical flaws in your argument.

In Christ,

Bob
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
BobRyan said:
One may easily respond that BobRyan is not such a person as in the case above that came to these texts listed with a prior-bias against what they teach. So you could easily challenge the idea that I would be so objective so Bible-based as to reject man-made tradition against these scriptures and accept the Bible's clear teaching that the thoughts of a PERSON in fact CEASE at death.

But in my discussion here it appears that Andre is just such a person and he is an example of at least one who did choose the Bible over tradition.

So much for blaming this all on "mean ol sdas"
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
From post 234

Originally Posted by BobRyan

However as it turns out - I am still going to have to stick with the Bible even if the mere quote of it appears to debunk your suggestions


No thought activity
Ps 146:2
I will sing praises to my God while I have my being.

3 do not trust in princes, in mortal man, in whom there is no salvation.
4 his spirit departs, he returns to the earth; in that very day his thoughts perish.
5 how blessed is he whose help is the God of Jacob,
Ecclesiasties 9:5-6 they have no activity


Ps 143
3Do not trust in princes,
In mortal man
, in whom there is no salvation.
4His
spirit departs
, he returns to the earth;
In that very day
his thoughts perish.



Isaiah 38
18"For Sheol cannot thank You,
Death
cannot praise You;
Those who go down to the pit cannot hope for Your faithfulness.

19"It is the
living who give thank
s to You, as I do today;
A father tells his sons about Your faithfulness.




DHK responds
As long as I am alive I will praise the Lord. As long I live I will trust in God. I will not trust in princes, but rather trust in the Lord.

Why? Man dies and his advice will go with him.


Bob responds
Not ONCE doe these texts reference "at death man's ADVICE to his fellow man ceases but his THOUGHTS continue" -


Even though this is a case where DHK's response is in clear contradiction to the context of these texts - I "suppose" this is where DHK believes he is "showing" that the context I just used for those texts (texts merely quoted) is wrong and his view is correct.

Working through that suggestion on DHK's part and contrasting it to the "mere quote" of the texts above - is left as an exercise for the reader.

In Christ,

Bob
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
From Post 224

Originally Posted by BobRyan

Matt 22
31 ""But regarding the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was spoken to you by God:
32 " I AM THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, AND THE GOD OF ISAAC, AND THE GOD OF JACOB'?
He is not the God of the dead but of the living.''



And for GOOD reason too - since scripture rejects the ghostly spirits concept!

ALL readers can see this point "clearly" when we LOOk at the texts in Isaiah, and Psalms and MATT 22

...


Matt 22:23-34 Christ insists that God is not the God of the dead.

Praise to God - ceases at death

Ps 115:17 the dead do not praise the Lord, nor do any who go down into silence;

18 [b]but as for us, we will bless[/b] the lord from this time forth and forever. Praise the lord!
Ps30:9 yet clearly when the living worship we "worship in spirit" John 4:24 -

No thanks or praise to God given by those that are dead.
Is 38:18 “for sheol cannot thank you, death cannot praise you; those who go down to the pit cannot hopefor your faithfulness.
19 “it is the living who give thanks to you, as I do today;

No memory of God
Ps 6:5for there is no mention of you in death; in sheol who will give you thanks?

No thought activity
Ps 146:2 I will sing praises to my God while I have my being.
3 do not trust in princes, in mortal man, in whom there is no salvation.
4 his spirit departs, he returns to the earth; in that very day his thoughts perish.
5 how blessed is he whose help is the God of Jacob,
Ecclesiasties 9:5-6 they have no activity


Ps 143
3Do not trust in princes,
In mortal man
, in whom there is no salvation.
4His
spirit departs
, he returns to the earth;
In that very day
his thoughts perish.



Isaiah 38
18"For Sheol cannot thank You,
Death
cannot praise You;
Those who go down to the pit cannot hope for Your faithfulness.

19"It is the
living who give thank
s to You, as I do today;
A father tells his sons about Your faithfulness.




Quote:
DHK said
When man dies he surely will have thoughts in the presence of God—thoughts of regret, of sorrow, and then for others thoughts of rejoicing. But for all, after death there will be thoughts. They will not perish

Contrasting what the texts say above about thoughts ceasing (as can be seen by even the most simple basic quote of the scripture here) - with DHKS argument that they do NOT cease is left as an exercise for the reader.

In Christ,

Bob
 
BR: Contrasting what the texts say above about thoughts ceasing (as can be seen by even the most simple basic quote of the scripture here) - with DHKS argument that they do NOT cease is left as an exercise for the reader.

HP: BR, with the way you treat Scripture in your quest for proof texts for your unfounded dogmas concerning soul sleep and the annihilation of the wicked, you would be just as well off trying to start a crusade proclaiming that God is a bird. Scripture does in fact state that “Ps 91:4 He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust:”

The reader has indeed had an exercise if they have followed your posts on this subject, an exercise in futility.
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
This post appears often in this thread - and is at times treated with the contempt that HP deals it in his post above --

Matt 22
31 ""
But regarding the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was spoken to you by God:

32 " I AM THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, AND THE GOD OF ISAAC, AND THE GOD OF JACOB'?
He is not the God of the dead but of the living.''



And for GOOD reason too - since scripture rejects the ghostly spirits concept!

ALL readers can see this point "clearly" when we LOOk at the texts in Isaiah, and Psalms and MATT 22

...


Matt 22:23-34 Christ insists that God is not the God of the dead.

Praise to God - ceases at death

Ps 115:17 the dead do not praise the Lord, nor do any who go down into silence;

18 [b]but as for us, we will bless[/b] the lord from this time forth and forever. Praise the lord!
Ps30:9 yet clearly when the living worship we "worship in spirit" John 4:24 -

No thanks or praise to God given by those that are dead.
Is 38:18 “for sheol cannot thank you, death cannot praise you; those who go down to the pit cannot hopefor your faithfulness.
19 “it is the living who give thanks to you, as I do today;

No memory of God
Ps 6:5for there is no mention of you in death; in sheol who will give you thanks?

No thought activity
Ps 146:2 I will sing praises to my God while I have my being.
3 do not trust in princes, in mortal man, in whom there is no salvation.
4 his spirit departs, he returns to the earth; in that very day his thoughts perish.
5 how blessed is he whose help is the God of Jacob,
Ecclesiasties 9:5-6 they have no activity


Ps 143
3Do not trust in princes,
In mortal man
, in whom there is no salvation.
4His
spirit departs
, he returns to the earth;
In that very day
his thoughts perish.



Isaiah 38
18"For Sheol cannot thank You,
Death
cannot praise You;
Those who go down to the pit cannot hope for Your faithfulness.

19"It is the
living who give thank
s to You, as I do today;
A father tells his sons about Your faithfulness.

I am more than happy to leave it to the reader to determine if there is some flaw in these texts or if merely quoting them and observing how they refute your views is something to turn a blind eye toward.

Let the evidence stand on it's own!

In Christ,

Bob
 
BobRyan said:
Bob argues from scripture -




HBSM posts a direct contradiction


And then backs it up with a parable where all saints sit in Abraham's lap and Abraham is in sovereign control over all saints and whether or not they will be resurrected.



Using that technique - we have the parable of the "trees electing a king over them"!!

Your saying the story of the rich man in hell is a parable does not negate the fact that it is not a parable.

Have you bothered looking up the word perish in the versie you quoted from. Psalm146?

All it means is that the thoughts wander away, not that they die as you would imply.
 
Ecclesiasties 9:5-6 they have no activity

from Albert Barnes:
See Ec 8:12, note; Ec 8:14, note. The living are conscious that there is a future before them: but the dead are unconscious; they earn nothing, receive nothing, even the memory of them soon disappears; they are no longer excited by the passions which belong to people in this life; their share in its activity has ceased. Solomon here describes what he sees, not what he believes; there is no reference here to the fact or the mode of the existence of the soul in another world, which are matters of faith.

The last clause of Ec 9:6 indicates that the writer confines his observations on the dead to their portion in, or relation to, this world.

from Adam Clarke:
The living know that they shall die - This is so self-evident that none can doubt it; and therefore all that have this conviction should prepare for death and eternal blessedness.

But the dead know not any thing - Cut off from life, they know nothing of what passes under the sun. Their day of probation is ended, and therefore they can have no farther reward in living a holy life; nor can they be liable to any farther punishment for crimes in a state of probation, that being ended.

The dead know nothing in the sense they do not enjoy, nor to they take part in that which happens before death. All that is passed and unreachable from the point of death but the soul lives on and if the soul was not saved beyond death, the soul will indeed remember the earthly things prior to death not things after death
 
John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
Ec 9:5For the living know that they shall die,… Death is certain, it is the demerit of sin, the appointment of God and the time of it is fixed; it may be known that it will be, from the word of God that assures it, from all experience which confirms it, and from the decline of nature, and the seeds of death in men. This "the living" know that live corporeally, even the wicked themselves, though they put the evil day far from them; and so good men, that live spiritually, being quickened by the Spirit and grace of God, and live a life of faith and holiness; they know they shall die, though Christ died for them, and has abolished death, as a punishment and a curse, and took away its sting, and made it a blessing; wherefore it is desirable to them, as being for their good: but there are some things about death they ordinarily know not; they do not know the time of their death; nor the place where they shall die; nor of what death they shall die; nor in what circumstances, both outward and inward: of these the Targum understands the passage;
"for the righteous know that if they sin, they shall be reckoned as dead men in the world to come, therefore they keep their ways, and sin not; but if they sin, they return by repentance;''
but the dead know not anything; this is not to be understood of their separate spirits, and of the things of the other world; for the righteous dead know much, their knowledge is greatly increased; they know, as they are known; they know much of God in Christ, of his perfections, purposes, covenant, grace, and love; they know much of Christ, of his person, offices, and glory, and see him as he is; they know much of the Gospel, and the mysteries of it; and of angels, and the spirits of just men, they now converse with; and of the glories and happiness of the heavenly state; even they know abundantly more than they did in this life: and the wicked dead, in their separate spirits, know there is a God that judgeth; that their souls are immortal; that there is a future state; indeed they know and feel the torments of hell, the worm that never dies, and the fire that is not quenched: but this is to be interpreted of their bodily senses now extinct, and of worldly things they have now nothing to do with; they know not any thing that is done in this world, nor how it fares with their children and friends they have left behind them; see Job 14:21; nor therefore are they to be prayed unto, and used as mediators with God. The Targum is,
"and sinners know not any good, so that they do not make their works good while they live; and they know not any good in the world to come;''
neither have they any more a reward; not but that there will be rewards in a future state, in which everyone shall have his own reward; there will be a reward for the righteous; they will receive the reward of the inheritance, though it will be, not of debt, but of grace; and particularly in the millennium state, Ps 58:11; and every transgression of the wicked will receive a just recompence of reward; to whom the reward of their hands will be given them, Heb 2:2; but the sense is, that after death there will be no enjoyment of a man's labours; he will not have the use, profit, and advantage of them, but his heirs that succeed him, Ec 4:9;
for the memory of them is forgotten; not the memory of the righteous with God, for whom a book of remembrance is written, and whose names are written in heaven; these are had in everlasting remembrance, and their memory blessed: but the memory of wicked men; who, though they take pains to perpetuate their names, which they give to their lands, yet the Lord causes their memory to cease, and they are forgotten in the place where they lived; not only among the righteous, as the Targum, but among others, Isa 26:14; even among those that enjoy the fruit of their labour; they will scarce think of them any more, or, however, in a little time they will be quite forgotten by them.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Bob's method of stringing together unrelated passages of Scripture in trying to defend an unscriptural defend is much like the proverbial women trying to find the will of God. Her method (much like Bob's) was to open her Bible and wherever her finger fell, that would tell her what God's wil for her life was.

On her first try she opened her Bible and her finger fell to:

"Judas went out and hanged himself"

Oh, that is not a very good verse, she said. So she tried again. This time her finger found:

"Go and do thou likewise."

Now she was a bit troubled, and thought surely if I try a third time God will reveal his will to me. So once again she opened her Bible.

"What thou doest, do quickly."

Bob strings his texts together in like manner. They are unrelated to each other, but when put together sends the wrong message.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top