• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Matt 7's "I never knew you" continued

Gerhard Ebersoehn

Active Member
Site Supporter
Lacy Evans:

"These three passages are laid out chronologically. It was not until late in Paul's ministry that he actually began to speak of having any sort of confidence that he would get in."

GE:

Maybe I know a bit of how Paul felt. When one face death, one may be surprised by himself. I faced death, and in those moments, felt confident in Jesus Christ as never before.

Just human feeling, I know. Yet, I feel I can say - or may say, with Paul, I am ready to be offered. But after all, with Paul, "I count not myself to have apprehended" but in and through Jesus Christ!
 

Gerhard Ebersoehn

Active Member
Site Supporter
I think it's a matter of shift of confidence, through the years! Ja. Someone once said, the highest place one may reach in spiritual growth is the foot of the Cross. The bigger one grows in faith, the smaller one gets in stature (it seems both spiritually and physically!)
 

Lacy Evans

New Member
Originally Posted by BobRyan

Yep "The KINGDOM OF HEAVEN"





"The sun never sets upon the Kingdom of Britain"

Is that the same as saying "The son never sets upon Britain"

Yes or no?
__________________

Originally Posted by BobRyan


Your "proof" that When Christ SAID "the Kingdom of HEAVEN" He did not really MEAN "heaven" is that you don't like HIS focus on "fruits" and on "works".

But the fact that His words ALSO debunk other false doctrine that you have does NOT form a kind of Proof that when He SAYS "Heaven" that is not what He means!!




I had to read that twice. Are you saying that salvation by faith-alone, apart from works, is a "false doctrine"?

If so, I'm with Steaver now! Where is the line?

BUMP!

What about it Bob?

Lacy
 
Last edited by a moderator:

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
(Jump)....I don't know 100%. If I gave that impression then I must apologize.

I'm not sure I would call it an "impression". You made it pretty clear........

(Jump, page 6, #58)....As of right now I am believing and have a faith that is working so should I die right now or should the Lord return I will have a place in His coming kingdom.

(Jump)...If I died today I truly believe that I will be found worthy. Now I could get to the day of judgment and be in the same boat as the Lord, Lord criers, but who would I be to argue with The Perfect Judge? If He deems me unworthy then I am unworthy.

And therein lies the problem with your pov. You can say you believe with all your heart, but you cannot be sure you will reign with Christ and thus the whole doctrinal teaching of do good worthy works or else is meaningless because one CANNOT KNOW if the works they are actually performing will be accepted! You can say you believe but you cannot show in scripture any absolute guarantee that your works are worthy. The doctrine is a failure. Sorry brother. :tear:

(Jump)...However Scripture has laid out the plan and I'm going to die to self as best I can and I'm going to continue to believe and confess when I fail. And then it will be up to Him to determine where I go next on that day.

And you can only hope, but at the same time fear that even though you loved Jesus and tried your absolute best you still might be tortured for 1000 years. This is why the doctrine has never taken hold. It is useless as a tool for obedience. It offers no assurance, only a grim hope because even those sincere believers who thought they were doing Jesus worthy deeds can find themselves rejected.

(Jump)...BUT if we are right . . . well . . . there are going to be some REALLY disappointed, regretful people after judgment day! That's simply a chance I don't want to take.

Even if you are right, you are still in the same boat as me! You have no assurance that your deeds will be accepted. We both love God, we both strive to do good, but according to your doctrinal pov on this we both could end up in the torture chamber EVEN if you would be right about this one thing!

So you have nothing special by holding onto this doctrine. Believing on this doctrine will not spare you the torture. As you said, even one unconfessed sin or one error in any other doctrinal pov will send you to the outerdarkness. So why boast as if holding this doctrine is somehow going to give you a special pass into the kingdom?

(Jump)....Of course you "think" you do, but just by your belief system that you have laid out that is not the case. You advocate a system of serving two masters without any repercussions. That's not Biblical. So your understandng at best is flawed.

IF I did advocate any system of serving two masters the consequences would be loss of rewards and the piercing through of many sorrows. That is hardly a system without any reprecussions.

Quote: (steaver)..
Jump you said if you were to die today you know for sure that your works will be accepted.

(Jump)...Again if I said that, then I will eat crow as I can't say that with 100% accuracy. However I have all confidence that I have been walking worthy of my calling. And I am comfortable (dangerous word) in my state at this present time. I by all means have not arrived and I don't feel like my race is over, but should it end I am confident that I will be found worthy.

I am not here to dish out any crow for a brother in Christ to eat. I am here to help others understand errors and to learn the errors of my own. As I walked you through this in Matt 7 it led you into a problematic situation and you needed to retreat a bit. This is good. It's like going through a maze and when you hit a road block you must back up, try another way or quit and lose.

It appears that this thread is at it's end now. I have shown the reader that the pov you hold is lacking in any assurance for the believer. There really is nowhere else you could go to have it make any sense at this point.

I am disappointed that you could not allow yourself to see the true hopelessness that it leaves with the believer. A hopelessness that I do not believe Jesus would want His children to have. I trust others have seen and will avoid the teaching. I do pray that God will bless you beyond your wildest dreams! :thumbs:

God Bless! :wavey:
 

Lacy Evans

New Member
steaver said:
It appears that this thread is at it's end now. I have shown the reader that the pov you hold is lacking in any assurance for the believer. There really is nowhere else you could go to have it make any sense at this point.
So you are declaring victory because there is no absolute assurance that a Believer will make the Kingdom? I'll ask again, do you throw out the idea of rewards, crowns, etc, because they are not absolutely, unconditionally sure? The promise of a believer's entering the Kingdom is conditional. How can a promise be unconditional (Which is the only sure promise) and conditional at the same time.

I am disappointed that you could not allow yourself to see the true hopelessness that it leaves with the believer. A hopelessness that I do not believe Jesus would want His children to have. I trust others have seen and will avoid the teaching. I do pray that God will bless you beyond your wildest dreams! :thumbs:

God Bless! :wavey:

I am disappointed that a stumblingblock like this could cause you to stop considering the truth. Millennial Exclusion is untrue because it teaches conditional rewards after unconditional sonship? Come on now.

Lacy
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
(Lacy)....The promise of a believer's entering the Kingdom is conditional.

So says your pov. And at the same time you cannot give the believer any assurance that they can know they have met the conditions and can be certain they will enter. SO you say there are conditions, but then you say you can not know for sure if you have met those conditions. So really you have given conditions without any way for the believer to KNOW they have satisfied those conditions. It is meaningless and hopeless!

God Bless! :thumbs:
 

J. Jump

New Member
And therein lies the problem with your pov. You can say you believe with all your heart, but you cannot be sure you will reign with Christ and thus the whole doctrinal teaching of do good worthy works or else is meaningless because one CANNOT KNOW if the works they are actually performing will be accepted! You can say you believe but you cannot show in scripture any absolute guarantee that your works are worthy. The doctrine is a failure. Sorry brother.
Sorry, but the last time I checked someone's lack of understanding didn't qualify as something being bad doctrine. Just because you can't understand it and get your hands around it doesn't make it false. If you are going to say it's false you are going to have to do so with Scripture not some opinion that shows lack of understanding.

And you can only hope, but at the same time fear that even though you loved Jesus and tried your absolute best you still might be tortured for 1000 years.
And that is right in line with Scripture so I'm not sure what you are looking for. We have a "hope" of glory. It's not a certainty. It's a hope. That's why it's called a hope.

This is why the doctrine has never taken hold.
That may be part of it, but the biggest reason is because of Satanic attack.

Even if you are right, you are still in the same boat as me! You have no assurance that your deeds will be accepted. We both love God, we both strive to do good, but according to your doctrinal pov on this we both could end up in the torture chamber EVEN if you would be right about this one thing!
And?

So you have nothing special by holding onto this doctrine.
Sure I do. It's called the Truth of Scripture. That's pretty special if you ask me.

Believing on this doctrine will not spare you the torture.
That's exactly right. That's why James said you have to have a faith that works. Believing alone will not save you. Believing alone is a dead or worthless faith. It accomplishes nothing unless it moves you to work.

As you said, even one unconfessed sin or one error in any other doctrinal pov will send you to the outerdarkness.
I don't recall saying this. I think you are oversimplifying what I was talking about to try to make your point stronger.

So why boast as if holding this doctrine is somehow going to give you a special pass into the kingdom?
That I am aware of I nor any other kingdom believer has done such.

IF I did advocate any system of serving two masters the consequences would be loss of rewards and the piercing through of many sorrows. That is hardly a system without any reprecussions.
Loss of rewards. Big deal. The smallest slice of paradise pie is nothing to shake a stick at don't you think. Who cares if someone losses something they never had anyway. Again this advocates that one can enjoy everything this word has to offer and still enjoy the riches of heaven.

Hardly a call to die to one's self in this life. In your point of view there is no need to die to self, because everyone ends up in the same place anyway regardless of whether they did or didn't. So why would you?

As I walked you through this in Matt 7 it led you into a problematic situation and you needed to retreat a bit.
Retreat a bit. :laugh: That was a good one. You view of Matthew 7 is pushing a works-based eternal salvation plan. I definitely am not the one that needs to be retreating.

I am disappointed that you could not allow yourself to see the true hopelessness that it leaves with the believer.
Well I guess if you call a "hope of glory" hopelessness then I'll take that every day of the week and twice on Sunday.

I trust others have seen and will avoid the teaching.
And just remember that each time you say this and someone takes you at your word, you are just making judgment day harder on yourself :(. Of course that's if we are right. If we're not then you have nothing to worry about, huh :).
 

Lacy Evans

New Member
steaver said:
So says your pov. And at the same time you cannot give the believer any assurance that they can know they have met the conditions and can be certain they will enter.

Of course I can't! How can I know how you finished when you are still going? if I tell my son to mow the lawn all summer while I am away, and when I get back, I'll pay him $X.00. How can I know in advance whether he will obey me and therefore earn his reward? Come on man, How complicated is this?

SO you say there are conditions, but then you say you can not know for sure if you have met those conditions. So really you have given conditions without any way for the believer to KNOW they have satisfied those conditions. It is meaningless and hopeless!

God Bless! :thumbs:

I can look at the conditions, and compare them with my life and get a pretty good idea. It is neither meaningless nor hopeless. You just insist on making it so by placing the burden on God to show you exactly how far you have to go to get in.

God gives us the indwelling Holy Spirit to empower and embolden us. He gives us absolute assurance of oue eternal sonship, Christ himself serves as our high priest. He gives us His perfect Word, The local church with all its effectual gifts, Godly counsel from books and friends.

What he doesn't give us is automatic reward without any moving in the things that I listed above.

We are without excuse if we miss the Kingdom. It is the Lord's good pleasure to give us the Kingdom.

Lacy
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Bob said
Your "proof" that When Christ SAID "the Kingdom of HEAVEN" He did not really MEAN "heaven" is that you don't like HIS focus on "fruits" and on "works".

But the fact that His words ALSO debunk other false doctrine that you have does NOT form a kind of Proof that when He SAYS "Heaven" that is not what He means!!



Your "proof" that when Christ SAID "I never knew you" that this shows the person never known - "to be SAVED anyway"
is that you don't like HIS focus on "fruits" and on "works".

A truly innexplicably leap of logic on your part.


However the fact that His words ALSO debunk other false doctrines that you hold. That that fact is FAR from any kind of Proof that when He SAYS "I never knew you" HE means to show "salvation APART From knowing Christ" as you seem to need.

Basically you are arguing what you NEED to have read into the text - not what the text actually says!!

Lacy Evans said:
[/color][/size]

I had to read that twice. Are you saying that salvation by faith-alone, apart from works, is a "false doctrine"?

Bump

What about it Bob?

Lacy

I cut my cable-modem with my lawn edger on Wednesday so I am a bit late responding.

I am saying that OSAS is dead wrong - but "Saved by grace through faith - not of works lest anyone should boast" is right on target!!

in Christ,

Bob
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
J. Jump said:
So what is the "next life?" Are you equating the age to come with eternity?

Yep - no dying then dying then dying again going on in the gospel.

It is appointed unto men "ONCE to die and THEN comes the judgment"
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Lacy Evans said:
Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.


Objective? Unbiased? Do you see Heaven or Eternity in this verse?

Matt 7 speaks to the "Kingdom of HEAVEN" that would REAL HEAVEN - real eternity REAL salvation.

No way to duck the point Lacy --

The objective unbiased reader will see the point instantly.

It it's talking about salvation in eternity or heaven (Which it isn't - it says KINGDOM!) then salvation is by works because there is no mention of any other way to get "saved" in the whole sermon.

Matthew 7:24-27
24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:
25 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.
26 And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:
27 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.

I can't help the fact that Christ does NOT preach a gospel of "cheap grace" of salvation for those who "do not know Christ".

It is what it is.

in Christ,

Bob
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Bob's post

Originally Posted by Lacy Evans
Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lacy Evans


Objective? Unbiased? Do you see Heaven or Eternity in this verse?


Yep "The KINGDOM OF HEAVEN"

And EVEN WORSE for your view - "DEPART from Me you workers of iniquity I NEVER KNEW YOU" can NOT be spun around into "WELCOME to HEAVEN without KNOWING Christ" as you have tried to bend the text so far.

Your "proof" that When Christ SAID "the Kingdom of HEAVEN" He did not really MEAN "heaven" is that you don't like HIS focus on "fruits" and on "works".

But the fact that His words ALSO debunk other false doctrine that you have does NOT form a kind of Proof that when He SAYS "Heaven" that is not what He means!!

J. Jump said:
[/color][/size]
Well again another text that doesn't support your view. The phrase "kingdom of heaven," is not a phrase that is speaking of "heaven"

And your PROOF for that wild assertion is???

The actual translation should be "the kingdom of the heavens." This is talking about the sphere above the physical earth where Satan and the fallen angels are currently ruling

And your PROOF for that incredibly wild assertion is???

AGAIN I would argue that the unbiased objective reader would not go for such wild extremes in logic and scripture bending.

In Christ,

Bob
 

J. Jump

New Member
And your PROOF for that incredibly wild assertion is???

It's called the Greek language Bob. Every instance where the phrase kingdom of heaven is in Matthew it is articular meaning it has a "the" before heaven and heaven is ALWAYS plural.

Therefore it is not a wild assertion, but what the language actually says.

I can't remember the actual reference, but Paul says that our treasures are being stored up in heaven. That is actually articular and plural as well. It should be translated our treasures are being stored up in "the heavens."

That is not a reference to God's current residence. Anytime "heaven," is spoken of in reference to where God currently resides it is singular.
 

Lacy Evans

New Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Jump
[/color][/size]
Well again another text that doesn't support your view. The phrase "kingdom of heaven," is not a phrase that is speaking of "heaven"



And your PROOF for that wild assertion is???



Actually the burden of proof to introduce a new idea never found in Scripture up to this point would be on you.

The simple reading says "Kingdom of Heaven" not "Heaven". The concept of "Heaven" is well established in the Old Testament, and always understood to mean "heaven"

Likewise the concept of a Kingdom was well established with Christ coming as messiah and King over all the world. (Da2:44, 1 Chron 17:11, Is 9:6)

In the New Testament, when approached by Jews about "the Kingdom", Christ had ample opportunity to "straighten them out" and explain that the "Kingdom" was really Heaven or the church or salvation or some such nonsense, Yet he never did. (Acts 1:6, Luke 17:20, Matt 20:20)

Jews expected a literal Kingdom and a literal Kingdom was preached in the NT. (Acts 2:9, Luke 1:30)

So prove to me that the "Kingdom of Heaven" is Heaven.

Lacy
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
(Jump)...If you are going to say it's false you are going to have to do so with Scripture not some opinion that shows lack of understanding.

I could give many scriptures and you would go through them one by one and tell me that they do not mean what i "think" they mean. So giving you scripture at this point is pointless. I tried that before. And likewise you could give me many scriptures that you believe support your view and I too would tell you that you do not understand what they really mean. So I have to leave it where it is at and that is as I stated.

(Jump)...And that is right in line with Scripture so I'm not sure what you are looking for. We have a "hope" of glory. It's not a certainty. It's a hope. That's why it's called a hope.

My hope for glory is in Jesus Christ alone as His finished works. My hope (Jesus) is sure and steadfast, my hope (Jesus) is gauranteed to protect me from the wrath of God. In contrast, your hope is in yourself. You hope you have done enough deeds, you hope you have done the deeds correctly. You cannot be sure that you will be accepted. I am sure that I will be accepted. Big difference in how we each use the words "hope of glory"!

(Jump)...That may be part of it, but the biggest reason is because of Satanic attack.

I must disagree. If the word you speak is true and is of God, satan could not defeat it. However it has stood defeated for quite some time, so i would say it is not of God.

(Jump)...You view of Matthew 7 is pushing a works-based eternal salvation plan. I definitely am not the one that needs to be retreating.

It is? My view of Matt 7 is that Christ never knew them intimately as a child (saved). I don't know were you ever got a works-based salvation out of that.

God Bless! :thumbs:
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
(Lacy)....Of course I can't! How can I know how you finished when you are still going? if I tell my son to mow the lawn all summer while I am away, and when I get back, I'll pay him $X.00. How can I know in advance whether he will obey me and therefore earn his reward? Come on man, How complicated is this?

If you were to die today would you be accpeted into the kingdom? I already know your answer..."I dont know for sure". It's not complicated at all.

(Lacy)...I can look at the conditions, and compare them with my life and get a pretty good idea. It is neither meaningless nor hopeless.

And still not know for sure! That is very meaningless and hopeless!

(Lacy)...God gives us the indwelling Holy Spirit to empower and embolden us. He gives us absolute assurance of oue eternal sonship, Christ himself serves as our high priest. He gives us His perfect Word, The local church with all its effectual gifts, Godly counsel from books and friends.

What he doesn't give us is automatic reward without any moving in the things that I listed above.

Amen! Preach it :thumbs:

We are without excuse if we miss the Kingdom. It is the Lord's good pleasure to give us the Kingdom.

Lacy

You mean reward us with the kingdom for our works. If He just gives it out of Good pleasure then that would not be a reward but a gift. Right?

God Bless! :thumbs:
 

Lacy Evans

New Member
steaver said:
And still not know for sure! That is very meaningless and hopeless!

Do you believe that every Christian's reward will be exactly the same, or do you believe that God will reward us according to our (individual and specific) works?

Just curious
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
(Lacy)...Do you believe that every Christian's reward will be exactly the same, or do you believe that God will reward us according to our (individual and specific) works?

Just curious

...the latter...

God Bless!
 
Top