MEDIA RUSHES TO SHIFT FOCUS OF PARIS ATTACKS AWAY FROM JIHADIST TERROR

[carpro]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa...ift-focus-paris-attacks-away-jihadist-terror/


MEDIA RUSHES TO SHIFT FOCUS OF PARIS ATTACKS AWAY FROM JIHADIST TERROR


Before the dust had settled and even the extent of the damage and number of dead had been tallied from a string of terror attacks in Paris, France, liberals in the old media establishment were already writing pieces blaming conservatives, bemoaning that the attacks had taken the focus off pet liberal issues like Mizzou and global warming and wringing their hands over the safety of Muslims.

Salon was early out of the gate with a story twisting the terror attacks into a weapon to use against conservatives.

Even as Islamist terrorists were still killing people across Paris, Salon rushed to Twitter to essentially blame the terror attacks on conservative rhetoric, saying, “Real terror unfolds in Paris. Perhaps this will convince the right to done [sic] down their incessant violent rhetoric.”

 

[777]

I was unfortunate enough to read that article in Salon - the far-left BLM writer can #sand.

Obama and Hollande had a conference call over global warming just before the last terrorist attack. These things take months to plan out, but just this week Hollande cancelled a meeting with a bunch of Muslims because they didn't want wine to be served at the dinner. The French offered to host a brunch but then they were called cheap by the Muslims.

The left will never catch a clue. Hollande has said before that terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, makes you wonder what the terrorists' real motives were yesterday. Any ideas?

 

[carpro]

"That wasn’t the only Salon story to misappropriate blame. In yet another Salon story, westerners are urged to “stop blaming Muslims and take a hard look at ourselves” to pinpoint who is at fault for the terror attacks."

Sounds a lot like the days following 911. We deserved it then.Speechless The French deserve it now.

You see, Muslims weren't actually pulling the triggers and setting off the bombs. The French did it to themselves ...or so the mindless minions of the left contend. Rolleyes

 

[Jedi Knight]

 

[Zaac]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa...ift-focus-paris-attacks-away-jihadist-terror/


MEDIA RUSHES TO SHIFT FOCUS OF PARIS ATTACKS AWAY FROM JIHADIST TERROR


Before the dust had settled and even the extent of the damage and number of dead had been tallied from a string of terror attacks in Paris, France, liberals in the old media establishment were already writing pieces blaming conservatives, bemoaning that the attacks had taken the focus off pet liberal issues like Mizzou and global warming and wringing their hands over the safety of Muslims.

Salon was early out of the gate with a story twisting the terror attacks into a weapon to use against conservatives.

Even as Islamist terrorists were still killing people across Paris, Salon rushed to Twitter to essentially blame the terror attacks on conservative rhetoric, saying, “Real terror unfolds in Paris. Perhaps this will convince the right to done [sic] down their incessant violent rhetoric.”

No difference in placing undo blame here than there is with political conservatives placing the blame for unarmed people murdered by police on the unarmed dead folks. Or on folks blaming what happened at UoM on the students inability to cope with college life as was said on Yahoo.Rolleyes

 

[just-want-peace]

No difference in placing undo blame here than there is with political conservatives placing the blame for unarmed people murdered by police on the unarmed dead folks. Or on folks blaming what happened at UoM on the students inability to cope with college life as was said on Yahoo.Rolleyes

Yep, I'm sure the folks just enjoying themselves really agitated the terrorists to result in MASS execution of INNOCENTS!!
Sheesh, you would be better off just stating that you "don't like" police, rather than trying to justify your bias with such asinine comparisons!!!
You at least would be beliveable then.

 

[Zaac]

Yep, I'm sure the folks just enjoying themselves really agitated the terrorists to result in MASS execution of INNOCENTS!!

Yes, and I'm sure the little boy playing in the park really agitated the police to the point of taking his life.
I'm sure Eric GArner figured he would agitate the police enough that day that he would be choked and then die.
I'm sure Freddy Gray felt like he had agitated the police enough that his spine would be severed from his body.
I'm sure Walter Scott figured he had agitated the police enough to be shot in the back.
Gosh, I'm sure all those unarmed black folks figured they'd agitated some terroristic police officers enough that over a period of time, they would represent one in a mass execution of innocent , unarmed people. And yes , I know they were innocent as well as you know that the folks killed in Paris were all innocents.

Sheesh, you would be better off just stating that you "don't like" police, rather than trying to justify your bias with such asinine comparisons!!!
You at least would be beliveable then.

Sheesh. You and your band of merry men would be better off stating you don't like black people who don't act like they are still on Massa's plantation for the police instead of showing such asinine bias. THAT would be VERY believable.Thumbsup

 

[Alcott]

Do French Lives Matter?

 

[Zaac]

Do French Lives Matter?

Some of you don't think Black lives matter so why would anyone expect you to think French lives matter? O h sure you might fix yor mouths to say ALL. But words are just words when they aren't accompanied by testifying action.

 

[Alcott]

Doesn't that guy give straight answers to simple questions?

 

[Zaac]

Doesn't that guy give straight answers to simple questions?

Awww. Upset that you can't control the narrative.There, there.

 

[Alcott]

Some of you don't think Black lives matter so why would anyone expect you to think French lives matter? O h sure you might fix yor mouths to say ALL. But words are just words when they aren't accompanied by testifying action.

Do they matter this much? http://www.ijreview.com/2015/11/473...owned&utm_campaign=culture&utm_term=ijamerica

 

[Zaac]

Do they matter this much? http://www.ijreview.com/2015/11/473...owned&utm_campaign=culture&utm_term=ijamerica

Yes, their cause STILL matters. But every one of them should face disciplinary action up to and including expulsion.

 

[carpro]

Yes, their cause STILL matters. But every one of them should face disciplinary action up to and including expulsion.

Hmmm....

Just wondering what's diffferent this time. It's how they act and what they say everywhere they go.

 

[Alcott]

Yes, ....

They DO matter that much?

 

[Zaac]

Hmmm....

Just wondering what's diffferent this time. It's how they act and what they say everywhere they go.

The library vs speaking engagements. You don't understand why that's different?

If you want to assert your right to free speech in a public forum, then feel free to do so. The proper people will either accommodate you or have you escorted out. You, however, do not have the right to harass people and terrorize them because they don't do what you think they should be doing.

So I say again, disciplinary action up to and including expulsion.

 

[Zaac]

They DO matter that much?

Yes, their CAUSE does still matter that much. The group of individuals in the library may not be the ones to present why it matters.

 

[carpro]

The library vs speaking engagements. You don't understand why that's different?

If you want to assert your right to free speech in a public forum, then feel free to do so. The proper people will either accommodate you or have you escorted out. You, however, do not have the right to harass people and terrorize them because they don't do what you think they should be doing.

So I say again, disciplinary action up to and including expulsion.

You're splitting hairs. Their most egregious behavior has been in private forums where they spouted their trash and would not allow the invited speakers to speak. Their behavior is always abhorrent, no matter what the forum. But they reserve their trashiest behavior for places where they are not invited. They act mostly like untrained rude animals and talk like gutter snipes.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Zaac]

You're splitting hairs. Their most egregious behavior has been in private forums where they spouted their trash and would not allow the invited speakers to speak. Their behavior is always abhorrent, no matter what the forum. But they reserve their trashiest behavior for places where they are not invited. They act mostly like untrained rude animals and talk like gutter snipes.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You're splitting hairs because you concluded a long time ago that what folks with BLM were saying wasn't important to you.

 

[777]

Looks like the MSM is failing in their rush to shift the focus back to the BLM. Like OWS in 2011, BLM is a deliberate attempt by Soros and his flunkies to gin up the vote for an upcoming presidential election. And like OWS, the BLM protesters are doing more damage to their cause than good but they're fading away too.