Neo-Molinism

[Yeshua1]

I would suggest you read this in order to understand Neo-Molinism. I don't agree with everything Boyd says, but he is right about your view being an anthropomorphic view of God, which is exactly what I said it was, minus the $4 word. By the way, you started this thread. It's up to you to view both sides of the issue before chiming in against someone else's resistance to your viewpoint.

Just a question!

if free will is not really an option, isn;t thiswhole dsicussion null and void?

 

[Benjamin]

Just a question!

if free will is not really an option, isn;t thiswhole dsicussion null and void?

Anytime free will is not "really" an option in one form or another you've reached theogical fatalism my hyper-determinist friend...

 

[thisnumbersdisconnected]

Just a question!

if free will is not really an option, isn;t thiswhole dsicussion null and void?

It is a fallacy that free will is not an option. So no, this discussion isn't "null and void."

 

[Yeshua1]

It is a fallacy that free will is not an option. So no, this discussion isn't "null and void."

How about this approach...

Would you agree with me that ONLY Adam before the fall and Jesus ONLY had real and full free will to decide what to do or not to do?