November 7th, 2006 - Day of Infamy

Hatred and sour grapes elevated to an art form. Remarkable.

 

You have a vivid imagination.

 

Do any of these listed elements exist in the same world
in which I exist? Maybe some nearby but parallel universe/plane?

 

Total Fear-Mongering Balderdash!

 

OP: //7. Homosexual marriages will be pronounced "normal" by The Supremes and the lower courts. Just as they found a "right to privacy" in Roe v. Wade, they will find one in homosexuality. Homosexuality will be declared a "civil right."//

Tee Hee.
To be followed soon by MANDATORY homosexual marriage.

 

:laugh:


I hope this silliness doesn't become a trend.

 

OP: //11. National identity cards will become a fact of life. One will be required to present the identity card to any law enforcement officer, even in the absence of reasonable suspicion or probable cause.//

That is a safe bet.
Ever been to a school lately?

 

Yes, because if you are a Christian and you did not vote Republican you obviously did not understand the issues. I missed the verse in the Bible that equates Christianity with being a Republican.

This statement alone is ridiculous. The rest of the email is absolutely absurd.

 

In line with what what said on another thread.

"The sky is falling"

You would think American had elected demons in stead of democrats this week. Someone needs to have the courage to tell Chicken Little and all her friends that it was only an acorn.


BTW - I found this one interesting.

Might we restate this with

 

On the other hand, look at each numbered item and think about its opposite. It would be nice to have a "moral majority" on the supreme court, I would think. Ridding the USA of the abortion nightmare would be a good place to start. But I agree with the email itself. It isn't going to happen now. I wonder how many mothers would kill their baby one minute AFTER birth. Frightening thought? Then why isn't it frightening one minute before birth? Or 1 day. Or 5 days. Or 1 month. Or 3 months. And wouldn't it be Christian to stand against homosexual marriage, even homosexual adoptions? I don't think the guy or gal who wrote that was angry or bitter or whatever. I think his or her heart was aching. My two cents. :flower:

 

The Republican Party left the religious right out in the cold, and those critical Congressmen in charge proved to be spineless appeasers afraid to take on Democrats with their own conservative ideals (those the party platform espouses). Those ideals when enunciated clearly, win elections nearly every time they are utilized.

 

The irony, of course, is that this president and congress have advanced socialism beyond anything Clinton would have done, and greatly increased the power of government over individuals.

People voted for the democrats because they wanted less socialism, and more freedom.

Ironic. And sensible. The republicans didn't replace the democrats. They became the democrats.

 

I was a little surprised by Tuesday's vote as I expected the Communists to pick up some seats, but certainly not as much as they did. What was more shocking and disgraceful was the next day when President Bush compromised every principal and fired Rumsfeld, agreed to raise minimum wage, acknowledged his delight that the Republicans who stood in the way of amnesty for illegal immigrants are now out of power and that he would be more likely to legalize criminal behavior with the Communists, said the communists who took delight in every bad thing that has happened in the war wanted us to win the war when he knows they don't, and sold out his principals and his country for the sake of saving his legacy. His legacy will be the same as his dad, in my eyes, that of a weak failure of a president. The only thing worse than that was the gloating from Al Queada that their guys won the election.

Joseph Botwinick

 

Preach it, Joseph!

IMHO the handwriting on the wall was when he agreed with the Saudis to recognize "Palestine" as a legitimate state.

 

Bush has played most everyone, actually, especially Christians.

 

And while that is true, there are also states that have advanced the liberal cause to the nth degree by electing people like Shumer and Hillary with around 70% of the vote. Its funny though, all those types of states seem bunched together except for California.

 

I rarely agree with Galatian, but I think he nailed it here.

 

Bush has already seriously limited free speech in the name of protecting us fro terrorists. I'll be suprised if he doesn't implement a national identity card in the next year or two. You've got it mixed up. The current administration has been trying to take away our freedom. The Democrats will work to bring it back.

 

Except they'll call it civil liberties.

I wonder about all this phone tapping and other stuff Bush is doing in the name of Homeland Security.