Featured Obama throws Depart. of Intell. under bus?

I sincerely hope you aren't actually expecting any of the d operatives on this board to rationally contribute anything factual to this question?!?!:sleeping_2:

As for others, I would consider this a rhetorical question.:thumbs:

 

I guess 0bam@ went ballistic when Bush blamed faulty intelligence but it seems like a good excuse when 0bam@ got caught asleep at the switch, didn't it?

 

I think you just accused Bush of throwing the Intel community under the bus. Nice. I'm sure I can look into the archives and find a thread from you guys showcasing your outrage over that right?

 

It's been known since 2009 that Obama gets his daily briefings in writing.

The reason: So no one can ever testify that they personally told him anything.

He had the info. He was warned. He's a liar.

It's in his genes to never take the blame for anything. There will be a lot of blowback on this. The intelligence community knows they gave him everything he needed to make actionable decisions. They will not stand idly by and let the liar-in-chief shift the blame.

He just failed to do so. He doesn't have a teleprompter in the oval office to tell him what to say or do.

 

That's illogical.

 

I see the newby liberal strikes again.



Anyway Obama cannot accept blame for anything. He is far too much of a political monster.

 

It sure is. No problem with Bush blaming intelligence but if Obama does it it's suddenly an issue. Hilarious.

 

Your sense of humor is not based upon any historical facts. 0bam@ is not a victim as he likes to portray himself. He is merely boring and is mostly ignored. To ignore a boor is not racist.

 

What in the world are you talking about? This post has nothing to do at all with what I wrote. Who brought race into this? Your posting has been really bizarre lately.

 

What are you talking about? I thought that you said that you have an Ivy League education? You know that your posts on this thread are not factual. 0bam@ said that Bush could not blame intelligence as an excuse and then 0bam@ turns around and blames intelligence on 60 Minutes. He acts as if he were a victim and the racists are out to get him. If he were responsible for his own acts, he would be a failure but it is always someone else at fault.

The word we are looking for to apply to 0bam@ is hypocrite.

 

Um, Bush and Powell both have blamed faulty intel in preparing to invade Iraq. They don't exactly shy away from it.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bush-admits-faulty-iraq-intel/

http://www.nationalmemo.com/powells...t-lies-but-powell-didnt-knowingly-lie-at-u-n/

Seems pretty factual to me.

I never said I had an Ivy league education either. Just another manifestion in your mind. When has Obama ever said racists are out to get him? That is not factual.

Here is the thing. When you search for information do you look for the actual story or do you simply look for things to confirm your own opinion?

 

Yes, Bush said that it turned out that the intelligence was poor. Then 0bam@ said that Bush could not blame faulty intelligence for his failures, etc. Now we have, as you know, 0bam@ saying that he got faulty intelligence.

Hypocrisy deluxe.

 

That's not the problem.


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/...er-Half-His-Second-Term-Daily-Intel-Briefings


REPORT: OBAMA HAS MISSED OVER HALF HIS SECOND-TERM DAILY INTEL BRIEFINGS

 

So when each new crisis and/or scandal unfolds, and we hear this:

Obama: "I've only heard about this today, same as you, from the news reports".

Maybe there's some truth to it?

 

And the intelligence agencies agreed with him. They don't agree with the blamer-in-chief.

 

Exactly. Now we know why he may be so ignorant of what is happening.:thumbs:

 

:laugh: :laugh:

 

http://bit.ly/1sLRHZJ

 

No, I intended boor:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/boor