• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

only 52% strongly oppose splitting the USA into red and blue countries

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Quarter of Americans believe it’s time for U.S. to split into separate red, blue countries

25% approve. These numbers are not surprising are they seeing how the LEFT continues its remorseless attack. This is a Rasmussen poll. I would put myself in the somewhat favor section
That is because the relationship is TOXIC and the attacks did not start with the right, it started with the LEFT trying to destroy the country, which is what a socialist revolutionary does, it is how they work.

Red%20Blue%20States%20Poll.png
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think that the country would have to be split into three: the east coast, the west coast, and the heartland. Or maybe New England could join Canada, the west coast could be a socialist peoples republic, and the rest could be a republic, just sayin’
 

mailmandan

Active Member
If the country splits I will stick with the republic side. I am not ready for a Godless, borderless, socialist, Sodom and Gomorrah America.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Quarter of Americans believe it’s time for U.S. to split into separate red, blue countries

25% approve. These numbers are not surprising are they seeing how the LEFT continues its remorseless attack. This is a Rasmussen poll. I would put myself in the somewhat favor section
That is because the relationship is TOXIC and the attacks did not start with the right, it started with the LEFT trying to destroy the country, which is what a socialist revolutionary does, it is how they work.

Red%20Blue%20States%20Poll.png
You mean like steve bannon
 

SavedByGrace

Well-Known Member
Quarter of Americans believe it’s time for U.S. to split into separate red, blue countries

25% approve. These numbers are not surprising are they seeing how the LEFT continues its remorseless attack. This is a Rasmussen poll. I would put myself in the somewhat favor section
That is because the relationship is TOXIC and the attacks did not start with the right, it started with the LEFT trying to destroy the country, which is what a socialist revolutionary does, it is how they work.

Red%20Blue%20States%20Poll.png

what is the Lord saying in all of this? I mean, He has allowed Joe Biden to be elected as POTUS, and did not stop this, even though He most certainly could have?
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think that the country would have to be split into three: the east coast, the west coast, and the heartland. Or maybe New England could join Canada, the west coast could be a socialist peoples republic, and the rest could be a republic, just sayin’
My state is primarily Democrat except 4 counties that are republican( always have been and always be). Under chris christy I observed subtle police state like enforcements being imposed on the citizenry all designed to make a buck. Cops were used to make it happen. My God, check points became a regular exercise. It started to feel we were living in a police state. I could go on but this all changed when a Democrat became the governor.
 

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
If the country splits I will stick with the republic side. I am not ready for a Godless, borderless, socialist, Sodom and Gomorrah America.
Imagine swearing allegiance to such a new state!

Revolutionary war, People fled to Canada who did not want to fight England, they were Tories.
 

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Preamble

Outlines a general philosophy of government that justifies revolution when government harms natural rights.[85]

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."[86]

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Tulsi Gabbard fears civil war coming on the Rubin report.

Yep, Ive been talking about for a couple of years. Tulsi, by the way looks like Democrat I can see wanting to work with unlike Pelosi, Schumer, Biden and their ilk.
 
Last edited:

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Preamble

Outlines a general philosophy of government that justifies revolution when government harms natural rights.[85]

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."[86]

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

Which by the way the Democrat party is trying to push us to despotism.
 

Quantrill

Active Member
I have repeatedly said in the past that some form of secession must be implemented to avoid a real civil war. And that will quickly turn into a race war.

It is not as though that is just a thought. If it isn't done, war will be the result. The divide is to great. No bridge can span it. Neither side can stand or live with the other.

A way must be provided to allow the conservative Christian right to live under the form of government it wants to. And to allow the atheistic liberal left to live under the form of government it wants to.

Quantrill
 

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
I imagine the sorting out of such splitting up will be a horrid mess. Your going to have major conservative communities in rural areas, and deeply socialist liberal ones concentrated in large cities. You think Brexit was tough to deal with... Of course if it really becomes a shooting war, the numbers of refugees would be in the millions.
 

Quantrill

Active Member
I imagine the sorting out of such splitting up will be a horrid mess. Your going to have major conservative communities in rural areas, and deeply socialist liberal ones concentrated in large cities. You think Brexit was tough to deal with... Of course if it really becomes a shooting war, the numbers of refugees would be in the millions.

There is no easy answer. To do nothing will not solve the problem. But, nothing is what is going to be done by the government as a whole. All will make a pretense how united we are as they sing 'battle hymn of the republic'. The whole time the pot is about to explode.

One way would be to just give back power to the States to govern as they want to. Quit trying to govern by Federal interference. If a State supreme court decides, quit trying to override it by the Supreme Court. Thus each state will take on a conservative or liberal life. But, it won't happen. Government never gives back power.

Quantrill
 
Top