The most depressing constructs of the last days are those which show no total victory of the believers, but some "gradual" righteousness that "slowly" spreads across the world.
Yea, kinda like a mustard seed and leaven and just about every other parable Jesus gave about the Kingdom.
There is absolutely nothing pessimistic about the idea that things are getting better because the Gospel is spreading and eventually the Church is going to do what Christ put the church on the Earth to do- baptize the nations.
The gates of hell are falling and are going to fall before Christ's church just like Jesus said they would.
Why would Christ want to come back as "Lord of Lords, King of Kings" when the world just rolls along like "ole man river."
Why not?
Pardon me, but I think that's a silly question.
There would never be an end, no need for a second heaven and earth, never an eternal lake of fire, no wedding feast, for the earth is just lifted from its "present condemnation" to life eternal.
You need to do some study on eschatology so you can come to understand what those terms mean in non-dispensational perspectives.
Besides, can anyone really hold that the world is being converted to Christ?
Everybody with half a brain and access to the remotest research tools already knows it.
The church started with a 120 in an upper room.
There's quite a few more than that today!
We got a long way to go but we've come a long way.
Does not that fly in the face of Calvinistic thinking? When will EVERYONE be saved in the Calvinistic view? Does not their own thinking disprove some world wide everyone saved view?
No. Calvinists are the ones who have been the greatest advocates of postmil eschatology. You need to do some study. You really do.
Postmil is the eschatology of the Puritans, William Carey, Adoniram Judson, Jonathan Edwards (perhaps the most brilliant theologian who ever lived- certainly top three [maybe behind Augustin and Calvin]), etc...
Frankly, the most depressing is that which considers that the state of the world is improving? What improvement?
If you have to ask that tells you how thick are the blinders you have on.
Do you have ANY
IDEA how bad things were 2,000 years ago??
In the last two hundred years, can anyone show improvement has not brought serious problems?
Can anyone NOT show it???? How could anyone MISS it????
Try all the medical "improvements." Are they actually all without huge problems? A list is foolish even to begin, but most medical folks agree that there are certainly medical advances, but no disease is completely wiped out - none. That some are now enhanced to be used as weapons...
There might not be a real medical doctor on EARTH who thinks that there have not been VAST medical improvements over the last 200 years.
I can't believe you would even IMPLY otherwise in public.
What of social, economic, and other "improvements?" Is not the evidence clear that, in the millennia from Eden, humankind have just invented better ways to slay Abel?
No. Apart from upheavals like the World Wars the world has been growing more and more tame- ESPECIALLY where the Gospel (particularly the Protestant handling of it) has prospered.
There are the FACTS and then there is this stuff that pessimists WANT to believe so they view the world through blinders.
The most civilized nations on earth are not feeding Christians to lions with tens of thousands cheering in the stands.
Yes, we need to conquer the Muslim world- and there is absolutely no reason to think we won't.
But freedom is GROWING in this world. What was NOVEL when our founders started it- is COMMONPLACE in the civilized world today.
MILLIONS are being saved in Africa and China every passing week.
South Korea is TEEMING with MILLIONS of Christians who were NOT there as little as 75 years ago!!
These are the FACTS.
FACTS.
What of the poor? Christ said, you will always have the poor. Is not the thinking that rejects the rapture and even that which rejects the literal millennium offering a communistic view of everybody will have and there will be no have nots, no rulers, no followers, ...
Deal with the facts above and I will explain this to you.
The most depressing aspect is the thinking that the evil of this world is not avenged, that God does not store up the tears in a bottle, and dump wrath upon those that for millennia have destroyed believers in the desire to eradicate light.
I am not sure this is even readable but I'll take a shot at what I think you are trying to say.
Sinners go to hell. That's where the wrath of God is poured out.
Do you expect God to resurrect all the persecutors of Christians over the past two thousand years so he can pour his wrath upon them in the "tribulation"?
How does that work??
And finally, it is so very depressing that the papists will never be held accountable for the idolatry driven worship,
So... you don't believe in hell and the judgment??
You think God's primary way of punishing popes is the 7 years of tribulation???
SERIOUSLY???
You're not kidding???
Is this really a point you are making???