Featured Predestination unto salvation

It is important to turn to Scripture when answering these questions.

Ephesians 1:3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, 4 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him. (Emphasis mine)

Romans 9:22-24 22 What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? 23 And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory, 24 even us, whom He also called, not from among Jews only, but also from among Gentiles. (emphasis mine)

The Elect are predestined to reconciliation and eternal life in Christ. The reprobate? That is hotly debated among Monergists. Infralapsarians believe that God chose the Elect and passed over those who are not elect. Supralapsarians believe both the Elect and the reprobate are predestined to their ultimate ends. I have bounced between Infra and Supralapsarianism over the years but I tilt towards Supralapsarianism. The reason I tilt towards Supralapsarianism is that it seems like a theological copout for God to choose one group and then just give the other group the back of His hand.

 

ημας (ἐγώ) "us" is a plural personal pronoun, in the first person in the accusative case. Paul does not introduce any other individual(s) in preceding verses except himself and the Ephesian believers. ἐγώ (eigo) is used by Paul to refer to both the believers in Ephesus as well as himself. In a larger sense, to "us" his extended audience, it means all believers. None of the epistles were written specifically to us today. They are all written to us today indirectly.

 

If it were for philosophical reasons I would not have confidence in my belief. I believe in the predestination of the Elect because I am convinced scripture clearly and unambiguously teaches it.

 

A few questions, ok?

Before God created anything did He know exactly who would be saved and who would not be saved? I believe He did.

If God wanted to, does He possess the power to intervene in any and every person’s life in such a way to bring them into a saving relationship with Himself? I believe He does.

So, if God knows the eternal outcome of all people, and He possesses the power to intervene to bring anyone to salvation, if He chooses to do so, then I believe the word “predestined” is an appropriate expression of that truth.

peace to you

 

Correct. Based on scripture which is the final authority for all matters of faith and practice. That does not mean I did not engage my mind or use the reasoning skills God endued me with.

Philosophy has its place in causing us to ask questions like "Who am I?" or "Do I have a purpose?" According to the Christian worldview, those questions are answered in the pages of scripture. Romans 1 is helpful as an example.

Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.

While creation alone does not reveal the Gospel, it does reveal the fact that there is a Creator. This fact is both philosophical and epistemological. Questions of being are asked as well as questions to gain knowledge. The answers to these questions are either God-given (through scripture) or man-given. But for the Christian, by necessity, there must be an appeal to scripture for answers to the great questions of life and existence.

 

I am interested in how people arrive at their conclusions, but I do rest on scripture. As far as whether we agree on scripture, that is another matter for another thread.

 

Jon, how do you defend that view biblically?

 

"Just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world,"

The point ignored here is "IN HIM".

The condition of being IN CHRIST was not since before creation.

Ephesians 2

12remember that at that time you were separate from Christ, excluded from citizenship in Israel and foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the world. 13But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near by the blood of Christ. (emphasizing BUT NOW IN CHRIST)

This implies quite clearly you were not in Christ.

Also the chose US doesn't automatically mean exclusively us.

This stupid idea of exclusivity based on being God's select aside from any quality or character was already exhibited in the attitude of the pharisees.

There is absolutely ZERO difference between a pharisees attitude and a Calvinist.

I would challenge can you name one difference? Its only a different brand/logo. One has a Yaweh T shirt the other has a Jesus T shirt.


11“The Pharisee stood and was praying this to himself: ‘God, I thank You that I am not like other people: swindlers, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector.

11“The CALVINIST stood and was praying this to himself: ‘God, I thank You that I am not like other people: UNELECT and Totally Depraved.


The two would share exact same teaching. Can't do nothing about it. Born into it, Either chosen or not.

In fact Jesus tells story. Points out sincerity of character. The Tax collector didn't go home patting himself on the back claiming to be chosen.

9And He also told this parable to some people who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and viewed others with contempt: 10“Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. 11“The Pharisee stood and was praying this to himself: ‘God, I thank You that I am not like other people: swindlers, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. 12‘I fast twice a week; I pay tithes of all that I get.’ 13“But the tax collector, standing some distance away, was even unwilling to lift up his eyes to heaven, but was beating his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, the sinner!’ 14“I tell you, this man went to his house justified rather than the other; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but he who humbles himself will be exalted.”

Folks who trust in themselves as righteous and view others with contempt.

Now Jesus points out the tax collector went to his house justified. In Calvinism thats a lie. You might as well flip a coin between both men.

 

Let me ask this a different way. Are you in agreement with the maxim that "scripture* is the final authority for all matters of faith and practice?" In other words, when it comes down to matters like that nature of man, the nature of God, sin, righteousness, salvation, Christian conduct, morality et. al; that the final source of truth on these subjects is revealed in the pages of scripture?

I ask these things not because I think philosophy is inherently wrong (it is not). I ask these things to determine what is Jon's final authority for faith and practice.

*By "scripture" I mean the 66 books of the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation (no apocryphal writings).

 

I apologize for my lack of clarity. The intent of my statement was whether we agree on any specific part of scripture is fodder for another thread, not that we are or are not in agreement on predestination.

See my question in post #16. What I am trying to determine is whether you consider scripture to be the final authority.

 

Thank you.

Having agreement on whether the 66 books of the Bible ("scripture") is the final authority for all matters of faith and practice is the prerequisite for fruitful discussions on all matters of doctrine and theology. Sometimes it is necessary, like on a message board, to fly our colors up the mast occasionally for others to see. Message boards gain new members and lurkers all the time and they may not know what we truly believe.

But you are right, scripture does not answer all our questions. Apple or Android? Thai or Chinese food? Bitcoin or precious metals for investments? Mets or Yankees? I know I am being a bit humourous but even in those things, we may find direction in scripture.