I'm not a Preterist and I don't know what level of proof you're looking for, but how about 1 Chron. 28:6, 10?
Can you prove that God disapproved of Solomon building the Temple? You might want to include 2 Chron. 7:12 in your reply.
1 Chronicles 28 is couched in questionable language (no doubt what the elderly David uttered), accurate to his claims... but were the claims true?
Was it because he shed blood that he was not the man to build the Temple?
1 Chronicles 28:3 clearly says it was.
2 Chronicles 7:12 shows that the LORD conceded to accepting the Temple Solomon built as a house of sacrifice. This he did in the same way he conceded to grant Israel a king (1 Samuel 8). But the idea was David's and Solomon acted on David's misinterpretation of 2 Samuel 7:12-13 (as David echoed in 1 Chronicles 28:6).
2 Samuel 7:12–13 (AV) 12And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom.
13He shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever.
Now observe the LORD's interpretation:
Zechariah 6:12–13 (AV)
12And speak unto him, saying, Thus speaketh the LORD of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The BRANCH; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the LORD:
13Even he shall build the temple of the LORD; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule upon his throne; and he shall be a priest upon his throne: and the counsel of peace shall be between them both.
The Messiah Jesus is the heir of David that was to build the Temple of God... out of the living believers:
1 Peter 2:3–10 (AV)
3If so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious.
4To whom coming, as unto a living stone, disallowed indeed of men, but chosen of God, and precious,
5Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.
6Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded.
7Unto you therefore which believe he is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner,
8And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed.
9But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:
10Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.
1 Corinthians 3:16–18 (AV)
16Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?
17If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.
18Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.
And there is no mention of the Temple in Hebrews 8:5.
Yet Solomon went right on building the Temple and sacrificing animals every few steps in its dedication (contrary to the Levitical Law). And God made concession to deal with Israel through the Temple system from that point onward...
From that point onward the Jews were seldom in God's good graces for any length of time. And though the name of the Lord was associated with it, Jesus did not venerate it. In fact he treated it as though it was the house of his father in name only. In Matthew 24 when the disciples marveled at the Temple complex courtesy of Herod the Idumean, Jesus brushed it off and focused in on its future destruction.
When you read the Sermon on the mount, Matthew 13, and Matthew 23 as State of the Kingdom addresses, you find that God's plan had been botched and bungled by man since day one. Here to set the record straight, Jesus put the Law of Moses back on course and paved the way for the New Covenant in his blood the blood of the Testator (Hebrews 9:16-17). See the Gospel in the Old Testament (Jeremiah 31:31-34).
So the OP's question in the other thread about Ezekiel's Temple and returning to the Law of Moses is making a good point but missing the purpose of them.
Daniel 9:27 (AV)
27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
The translators that try to redefine "covenant" as a peace treaty or the like divert from the correlation of the "covenant" and the sacrifice and oblation in the text. He will confirm it with everyone (the world) for 7 years BUT reneges in the midst or middle (the Hebrew word is commonly used to indicate "half").
Means the Mosaic Law will be back in force, the Temple will be rebuilt... but obviously not according to God's plan. But in the end it will serve his purposes. All things eventually do.
