xdisciplex
New Member
I found a discussion in another forum where an unbeliever asks a few interesting questions. Actually I have thought the very same things, too, and wasn't able to answer them very well. What do you say about these things?
Some things are really not easy to answer and sometimes I feel as if christians simply have their standard answers to such hard questions. I don't know where these answers come from, maybe an intelligent christian once came up with answers to tough questions and then these answers were taught to all christians and now they simply repeat them but how do we even know that they are correct? What if we simply repeat everything what we were told?
Anyway, here is the quote. The author basically argues that we have no free will because God is like: "Either you love me and obey me, or you're going to hell."
Some things are really not easy to answer and sometimes I feel as if christians simply have their standard answers to such hard questions. I don't know where these answers come from, maybe an intelligent christian once came up with answers to tough questions and then these answers were taught to all christians and now they simply repeat them but how do we even know that they are correct? What if we simply repeat everything what we were told?
Anyway, here is the quote. The author basically argues that we have no free will because God is like: "Either you love me and obey me, or you're going to hell."
you're talking about love. how is it love when someone kills you for not loving them. have you ever heard the phrase "if you love something, set it free?" it's not, "if you love something, set it free. and when it doesn't love you back, punish it and kill it. torture it for all eternity."
love does not create a scenario in which you must choose between either loving/worshiping it, or facing misery and punishment.
would you create a child, and tell it "love me, or live eternity in misery. love me or be drowned." would you create it, knowing that if it didn't love you, for whatever reason, it would suffer? even if you want to say, "oh, well it's not my fault that the alternative is pain," you have still created that child, knowing what it will face as an alternative.
what's worse, when you take this analogy further, towards a closer parallel, this parent knows exactly how this child will react before the parent even creates it. would you create a childing knowing that they would for SURE reject you? and you act like it's so simple to just chose to love that parent.
well, what if all this child has are rumors of that parent? what if this child has 50 different people all claiming that they know who this kid's long lost dad is, and he's described in 50 different ways, and this child has 50 different sets of laws s/he's supposed to follow in order to be let into his mansion and find him. what if this child finds no good reason to believe in any of them? even if s/he does, what if they think this person sounds like a total psychopath. they still must submit or be punished.
this is not the type of person i'd ever want for any sort of a parent. this is not love. this is madness. pure madness.
NE within that department ANYWHERE would say a fire that has burnt a structure to the ground would call it unquenable after the fact. But during the time the fire is raging and nothing can done at that point impedes its consumption THEN it is refered to as being unquechable! To burn something up also does not have the same conotation as being destroy or non-existent.