1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Question to "TR-Only"s

Discussion in '2000-02 Archive' started by JesusIsLord, Nov 27, 2002.

Top Posters
  1. JesusIsLord

    JesusIsLord New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2002
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have a question to all "TR-Only"s (people who believe that the Textus Receptus is God´s perfect word):

    What do you think about the King James 2000 Bible(not Millennium Bible!)? Information can be found here
    King James 2000 Bible
    It has archaic words updated, no thees and thous and modern sentence structure. Everything else is the same (not like the NKJV).
    What do you think about it???

    Be blessed.

    Alex

    [ November 28, 2002, 02:47 AM: Message edited by: JesusIsLord ]
     
    #1 JesusIsLord, Nov 27, 2002
  2. jackson

    jackson New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    interesting does anyone know anything Robert A. Couric
     
    #2 jackson, Nov 28, 2002
  3. tyndale1946

    tyndale1946 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    11,184
    Likes Received:
    2,489
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thank you anyway I will keep my KJV and you can have your KJV 2000. Why doesn't everyone just leave the KJV alone?... Brother Glen :confused:

    [ November 28, 2002, 03:35 PM: Message edited by: tyndale1946 ]
     
    #3 tyndale1946, Nov 28, 2002
  4. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,401
    Likes Received:
    553
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The KJV that everyone uses is, of course, a vastly different/revised document. So why would this process NOT continue in more modern revisions like the KJV2000? This would make sense and be consistent.

    Unless one believes that the present revision of the KJV one uses is supposedly the ONLY one (perfect, finally got it right, etc). Then that becomes a matter of doctrine and that is another thread.
     
    #4 Dr. Bob, Nov 29, 2002
  5. Jude

    Jude <img src=/scott3.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2001
    Messages:
    2,680
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just what America/Canada needs, ANOTHER Bible translation?!?! :rolleyes:
     
    #5 Jude, Nov 29, 2002
  6. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,401
    Likes Received:
    553
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I agree, Jude. Another English translation will be used by the Spirit to bring the light of the Gospel to a person who just "might not get it" through any of the myriad of other translations.

    God is SO good to us, giving us such a wealth and variety of expression/translation in English.

    [I am aware that Jude was actually bemoaning the fact, but I genuinely see it as a plus]
     
    #6 Dr. Bob, Nov 30, 2002
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Loading...