• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

RGB Passing: An October Surprise, Black Swan, Cosmic Curveball or All 3?

Alan Gross

Well-Known Member
AMY CONEY BARRETT was under serious consideration, for Supreme Court Justice,
AT THE TIME that "THE CATHOLIC BOYS" all, supossedly, 'got in trouble', for disrespecting a Deep State set-up, with "The
Covington Catholic students' clash with a Native American elder" false flag fiasco.

What is the deal?

AMY CONEY BARRETT is a Devote CATHOLIC.

"The Covington Catholic students' clash with a Native American elder" false flag fiasco,
WAS SET-UP and PLANNED to be able to "PAINT ANYONE CATHOLIC as SLIMBALL, JERK-OFF, BULLY-SNOBHEAD.

That would be the Deep Sates 'Picture they Painted Amy Coney Barrett' with.

I follow this stuff.

That is what most reading, thinking people, said then,
when The Boys thing WAS INVENTED FOR A REASON.


BARRETT = CATHOLIC= DoDo.

It Didn't Work.

But, that what 'they' do.

RGB Passing: An October Surprise, Black Swan, Cosmic Curveball or All 3? | SOTN: Alternative News, Analysis & Commentary

Demise of Ginsburg Foreshadows the
Greatest Political War of the Decade

State of the Nation

In the American legal arena as well as judicial front, it simply does not get any BIGGER that the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
What the nation is about to witness is the single greatest battle in history to control the destiny of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Given that Deep State operative Chief Justice John Roberts has morphed into a hardcore globalist and traitor to the Republic, who actively and frequently legislates from the bench, the replacement for Ginsburg is of paramount importance for the Right.

Of course, that Roberts has routinely cast the deciding vote siding with the Left-wing justices also makes Ginsburg’s replacement quite crucial for the oppressed Patriot Movement. For Roberts has become the most dangerous Chief Justice in SCOTUS history regularly doing awesome and irreparable damage to the country with each session.

Enter Judge Amy Coney Barrett
In light of the utterly repugnant infanticide laws being passed by states across the USA, President Trump is compelled to select a justice who is unequivocal about their intention to overturn Roe V. Wade and protect the unborn.

At the very least, a Ginburg replacement must be appointed who will support a future SCOTUS decision that permanently strikes down every state statute permitting the premeditated murder of newborn infants[1], as well as the deliberate killing of aborted babies who live through the abortion process but are allowed to die a slow death.[2]

Just who is it that would unflinchingly uphold the U.S. Constitution, especially where it concerned outlawing the cold-blooded murder of the unborn?

ap18183727055084-1.jpg

JUDGE AMY CONEY BARRETT

AMY CONEY BARRETT: The Best Conservative Replacement for Ginsburg
Bottom Line: Given the monumental import of the passing of RGB, it ought to be self-evident that this profoundly defining moment of the 2020 election is yet another early October Surprise, a Black Swan event and a cosmic curveball. Moreover, if the conservative, nationalist, Patriot Movement ever got a glimpse of direct divine intervention, this particular VIP departure is it!

State of the Nation
September 19, 2020

[1] INFANTICIDE: Let’s not forget that there nine states allowing the deliberate killing of infants

[2] 19 States Allow Infanticide, Let Abortionists Leave Babies to Die Who Survive an Abortion
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't think that this is an October surprise and I don't think that this will be a great struggle. Either the GOP will have the votes or they will not. It is not an October surprise because it is an historical occurrence, not a political ambush of some sort. I think that the GOP has the votes because Barrett is a good candidate and because Trump is surging in the polls because he is able once again to hold rallies. Trump's rallies may be smaller than usual because they are in small airports so far but they are outside and the enthusiasm for Trump is astounding. He is just popular, something that neither Harris nor Biden has ever been. Furthermore, Trump has been nominated for two Nobel Prizes as Sunni Muslims align with the USA and Israel against Iran and Turkey. Gaza has become a secondary issue and the Arabs in that tiny place should settle down and ask politely to be allowed to migrate to Arab countries looking for labor. The whole world is sick of Iran.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
But will the independent voters not vote for Trump as he changed the rules from what
happened 4 years ago.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't think that this is an October surprise and I don't think that this will be a great struggle.

Ditto. Just expect a whooooole lot of noise.

Either the GOP will have the votes or they will not.

Ditto. If they have the votes then it's all over with except for the weeping, crying, and gnashing of teeth. Let em' riot and burn and show their butts, we've seen that, let em' try it in the red states, it'll be short lived and Trump will be even more popular.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But will the independent voters not vote for Trump as he changed the rules from what
happened 4 years ago.

Obama didn't have the votes. Romney probably will vote with the Dems. Trump said in South Carolina that this had happened 28 or 29 times in American history. It happened to Washington and he sent up a nomination as did most others. The GOP is on solid ground. Obama was a lame duck. Trump is running.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Ask Sen McConnel

I understood your post to imply Trump changed the rules.

If you know what rules were changed why can't you tell me or at least provide a link?

"The only rule that applies, and it’s a reasonable one, is that Supreme Court nominees get confirmed when the president’s party has secured enough support from the electorate to muster the 50 Senate votes needed to confirm."
What it all comes down to

VP will make it 51.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
I understood your post to imply Trump changed the rules.

If you know what rules were changed why can't you tell me or at least provide a link?

"The only rule that applies, and it’s a reasonable one, is that Supreme Court nominees get confirmed when the president’s party has secured enough support from the electorate to muster the 50 Senate votes needed to confirm."
What it all comes down to

Not Trump - but McConnel - if you keep up even halfway - .......
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Not Trump - but McConnel - if you keep up even halfway - .......

Again, I understood your post to imply Trump changed the rules:
But will the independent voters not vote for Trump as he changed the rules from what happened 4 years ago.
What other way to read that is there?

And again, if you know what rules were changed why can't you tell me or at least provide a link?
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Romney probably will vote with the Dems.

So far what Romney, Murkowski, and Collins have indicated is that they'd rather wait until after the election for the confirmation process. But they're not in charge of that. None of them have indicated they'd vote against the nominee.
 
Top