Did Peter Ruckman make conflicting or contradictory claims concerning variations or differences in the many varying KJV editions?
In his commentary on the book of Revelation, Peter Ruckman asserted: “Things different are not equal” (p. 18). In this same commentary, Peter Ruckman wrote: “You can’t change the meaning without changing the words, and you can’t change the words without changing the meaning” (p. 606). In his commentary on the book of Genesis, Peter Ruckman asserted: “For if you can change one word, you can change two, and if you can change two verses, you can change ten verses” (p. 295). In his commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, Peter Ruckman wrote: “We will not alter ONE word in the text of the Authorized Version which we have on the table before us” (p. v). In volume one of his commentary on the book of Psalms, Peter Ruckman asserted: “We will leave every ‘jot and tittle: as it stands in the Authorized text” (p. vi). Peter Ruckman wrote: “The words in a text can’t be changed and still be the same text. It is only an evil imagination that makes anybody think they can” (About the New Scofield, p. 7).
Peter Ruckman wrote: “We recommend any edition of the AV (with any number of variations from any other edition)” (Bible Believers’ Bulletin, Sept., 1985, p. 3). In this same article, Ruckman commented: “In our group, we hold that ANY edition of the AV is reliable” (p. 2). In this article, Ruckman’s only stated exception from being an edition of the AV was the NKJV. Again concerning the KJV, Ruckman claimed that “any edition will do just fine” (Unknown Bible, pp. 1, 86). Ruckman referred to “any edition in any century” of the KJV (How to Teach the “Original” Greek, p. 119). Ruckman appealed to “a King James Bible (any edition from any year)“ (Difference in KJV Editions, pp. 9-10). Ruckman also referred to “a present copy of the AV, which anyone can buy anywhere” (p. 11). Ruckman claimed that “any edition of the AV (Edinburgh, London, Oxford, Nelson, Cambridge, New York, etc.) is vastly superior to the ‘originals’” (p. 18). Ruckman asserted: “The text of the AV in any edition is the text authorized by the Godhead, and it is the text that the Holy Spirit has continually stamped with His approval, in any edition” (Bible Babel, p. 92). Ruckman claimed: “You can find that word [the word of God] and those words [the words that God wants us to have] in ANY EDITION of an Authorized Version” (Biblical Scholarship, p. 414).
Do all the varying editions of the KJV actually have every” jot and tittle” the same so that they all can be left as they stand and still agree perfectly?
In his commentary on the book of Revelation, Peter Ruckman asserted: “Things different are not equal” (p. 18). In this same commentary, Peter Ruckman wrote: “You can’t change the meaning without changing the words, and you can’t change the words without changing the meaning” (p. 606). In his commentary on the book of Genesis, Peter Ruckman asserted: “For if you can change one word, you can change two, and if you can change two verses, you can change ten verses” (p. 295). In his commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, Peter Ruckman wrote: “We will not alter ONE word in the text of the Authorized Version which we have on the table before us” (p. v). In volume one of his commentary on the book of Psalms, Peter Ruckman asserted: “We will leave every ‘jot and tittle: as it stands in the Authorized text” (p. vi). Peter Ruckman wrote: “The words in a text can’t be changed and still be the same text. It is only an evil imagination that makes anybody think they can” (About the New Scofield, p. 7).
Peter Ruckman wrote: “We recommend any edition of the AV (with any number of variations from any other edition)” (Bible Believers’ Bulletin, Sept., 1985, p. 3). In this same article, Ruckman commented: “In our group, we hold that ANY edition of the AV is reliable” (p. 2). In this article, Ruckman’s only stated exception from being an edition of the AV was the NKJV. Again concerning the KJV, Ruckman claimed that “any edition will do just fine” (Unknown Bible, pp. 1, 86). Ruckman referred to “any edition in any century” of the KJV (How to Teach the “Original” Greek, p. 119). Ruckman appealed to “a King James Bible (any edition from any year)“ (Difference in KJV Editions, pp. 9-10). Ruckman also referred to “a present copy of the AV, which anyone can buy anywhere” (p. 11). Ruckman claimed that “any edition of the AV (Edinburgh, London, Oxford, Nelson, Cambridge, New York, etc.) is vastly superior to the ‘originals’” (p. 18). Ruckman asserted: “The text of the AV in any edition is the text authorized by the Godhead, and it is the text that the Holy Spirit has continually stamped with His approval, in any edition” (Bible Babel, p. 92). Ruckman claimed: “You can find that word [the word of God] and those words [the words that God wants us to have] in ANY EDITION of an Authorized Version” (Biblical Scholarship, p. 414).
Do all the varying editions of the KJV actually have every” jot and tittle” the same so that they all can be left as they stand and still agree perfectly?