The thread was hijacked iwth some iimportant things still left to consider.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely NO disagreement here!! I believe the value and significance of the gospel are the facts! And that we act upon it by repenting and receiving/trusting Christ. That is being "CONVINCED" enough to let it change your heart and life, right?
Same thing I believe. Here's where we may differ ---- I believe that, until we are regenerated receiving the Spirit seal, we "hope" for eternal life. Belief is merely "hope" regarding anything future. We Christians talk about the "blessed hope" because we believe it but we haven't experienced it so it is unproven. Likewise, we have no proof when we act upon our belief in Christ. But when we act upon it, we receive the HS and receiving Him, we have faith --- we have proof that our hope was true!!
Here's my thought: Have you ever heard the expression "I've had a change of heart about him/her?" What happened? You found out something that wasn't what you first believed, right? Say you hired someone thinking they were honest and you found that they weren't. It wasn't the Spirit that changed you mind. It was the facts. Same with the gospel -- except it is the Spirit feeding you the facts.
Change of heart" accounts for changing not just the mind but the emotions and will.
That latter is certainly true! Calvinists would say "change of heart" and most wouldn't even know what the heart is. So yeah, we'd be talking about 2 different things.
But show me how the Calvinist heart is changed. That is the point I have been trying to drive home --- there is no discernable meaning of "heart" in Calvinism. Faith for Calvinism is a spontaneous thing --- something out of nothing. But man is already something.
skypair
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
russell55 said:It sort of comports with what you said. The difference is in our definitions of "believe". You think believing is only a mental assent to the facts of the gospel. For a Calvinist, like Packer, like me, it is more than that. It is seeing the value and significance of the gospel and trusting in Christ and his work.
Absolutely NO disagreement here!! I believe the value and significance of the gospel are the facts! And that we act upon it by repenting and receiving/trusting Christ. That is being "CONVINCED" enough to let it change your heart and life, right?
russ said:So belief (at least saving belief) is not the same thing as convincing, but rather belief comes as a result of the Spirit's work of convincing.
Same thing I believe. Here's where we may differ ---- I believe that, until we are regenerated receiving the Spirit seal, we "hope" for eternal life. Belief is merely "hope" regarding anything future. We Christians talk about the "blessed hope" because we believe it but we haven't experienced it so it is unproven. Likewise, we have no proof when we act upon our belief in Christ. But when we act upon it, we receive the HS and receiving Him, we have faith --- we have proof that our hope was true!!
russ said:We're equivocating on "change of mind" here. If by change of mind, you mean the inner change wrought by the Holy Spirit, then it is the same thing as regeneration. If by change of mind you mean the embracing of the the gospel by someone who had previously rejected it, then it comes as a result of regeneration.
Why the distinction?
Here's my thought: Have you ever heard the expression "I've had a change of heart about him/her?" What happened? You found out something that wasn't what you first believed, right? Say you hired someone thinking they were honest and you found that they weren't. It wasn't the Spirit that changed you mind. It was the facts. Same with the gospel -- except it is the Spirit feeding you the facts.
Change of heart" accounts for changing not just the mind but the emotions and will.
russ said:I don't think the definition of heart is where the difference is. The difference is in the definition of belief, and theconfusion that comes from the careles=s use of "change of mind" in two different senses.
That latter is certainly true! Calvinists would say "change of heart" and most wouldn't even know what the heart is. So yeah, we'd be talking about 2 different things.
But show me how the Calvinist heart is changed. That is the point I have been trying to drive home --- there is no discernable meaning of "heart" in Calvinism. Faith for Calvinism is a spontaneous thing --- something out of nothing. But man is already something.
skypair