I'm not sure I understand what J.Jump is talking about. It sounds as though he's saying the spirit is saved, but the soul is yet to be saved.
I believe this is his position. He may correct me if this is wrong understanding of his view.
God Bless!
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I'm not sure I understand what J.Jump is talking about. It sounds as though he's saying the spirit is saved, but the soul is yet to be saved.
(Jump)...Sorry, but there isn't any evidence that this it true in Scripture. We are saved unto good works that we SHOULD walk in them. For some reason Christendom wants to re-write that Scripture to say we WILL walk in them, but that's just simple not what it says.
Hi Steaver. No assumption here. I agree with you. I just wanted confirmation of your position. Thanks!:thumbs:Quote:
Hi J. Jump and Steaver,
Steaver, am I correct in assuming that what you are saying is that James is telling them to quit succombing to the temptations of the world and to embrace, or make use of, the word that they have received?
Verse 21 in James reminds me of the personal struggle that Paul had with himself as mentioned in Romans 7:21 through the end of the chapter. Then he makes the point in Romans 8:1 that:
"Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus."-NIV
Steaver-I don't think this particular text needs to be left to assumption. With study and rightly dividing the word of truth we can be very sure that this is indeed what James is saying. However I do agree with everything that you have posted. Amen!
God Bless!
A "true Christian" is one whose life reflects the acceptance of Jesus Christ as their personal Savior. They have faith that Christ is who and what He says He is, and they are willing to place their life in His hands.Quote:
Oasis-A true Christian's sanctified life will be a by-product of his/her justification.
J. Jump-Sorry, but there isn't any evidence that this it true in Scripture. We are saved unto good works that we SHOULD walk in them. For some reason Christendom wants to re-write that Scripture to say we WILL walk in them, but that's just simple not what it says.
What I mean by "true Christian" is someone that has not only head knowledge of the truth, but has experienced the heart change(change of nature)that accompanies it.If a "true" Christian (whatever that means, does that mean there are "false" Christians?) is automatically going to live a sanctified (separated) life then there would be absolutely no need to command it, to be reminded that we need to be separated. There would be no need for James to tell them that they need to receive the word. If it was automatic they would have already been doing it.
Scripture is easy to understand in all areas if we allow the Holy Spirit to do the "driving."Again Scripture in so many areas is so easy if we just let the text say what it says without trying to manipulate it.
You have to clear up the "lost but still saved anyway" doctrine - from scripture to make this work.
In Christ,
Bob
Amy welcome to our discussion. I am not saying the spirit is saved, but the soul is yet to be saved, that is what the Bible says. And we can either believe it or we can try and dodge the texts to believe what we want to believe.I'm not sure I understand what J.Jump is talking about. It sounds as though he's saying the spirit is saved, but the soul is yet to be saved. I guess the spirit and soul go to different places?![]()
1 Thess. 5:23 Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely; and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Sound like we'll stay in one piece to me.![]()
Steaver until you can come up with something better than this I think we are done. I am not the one saying James didn't say receive when it is plainly in the text.Brother, why do you keep accusing others of "re-writing" scripture when you have been very persistant at re-writing James 1:21 to leave out the "engrafted" word in the verse?
If the word has been engrated into me at the very moment I believe then there would be no need for me to study. I don't know very many people, including myself that are going to follow along on this point. The entire word has not been engrafted into you.The word that has been implanted into you at your regeneration.
Steaver you continue to amaze me. I have considered your explanation for James 1:21, and it leaks like a sieve.Jump will not consider my explanation for James 1:21, maybe Jump will accept Paul's and John's word on the matter.
That's not what Scripture says. Scripture says those that believe are saved, not those that believe and reflect.A "true Christian" is one whose life reflects the acceptance of Jesus Christ as their personal Savior.
There is a difference between having faith in Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God, and Jesus as the Christ, the Annointed One, Messiah and King.They have faith that Christ is who and what He says He is, and they are willing to place their life in His hands.
With all due respect you are confusing eternally saving faith and sanctifying faith. The book of Hebrews is speaking of faith "after" eternal salvation has been complete.FAITH obeys and endures. The whole of Hebrews 11 attests to it.
EXACTLY. Again this has been my whole point the entire time. We are not talking about eternal saving faith we are talking about sanctifying faith. They are not the same thing. And just because you have faith that eternally saves you does not mean that you will have faith that sanctifies you. And James tells us that even if you do have that faith, but it doesn't motivate you to the good works you were saved for then it is a dead faith that will not save you.Living faith is the mark of sanctification of the believer.
Again Scripture just says we have to believe to be saved. Anything that adds to or takes away from that is outside the bounds of Scripture. A Christian (there is no such thing as a "true" Christian and a "false" Christian) is a person that has believed in Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God, Who shed His blood and died on behalf of that individual, who is a sinner. That's it. Nothing else.What I mean by "true Christian" is someone that has not only head knowledge of the truth, but has experienced the heart change(change of nature)that accompanies it.
Sorry, but the language of the text does not support your statment. James 1:21 is a command. James says receive. That's not a suggestion, but an imperitive. It is a command.James is not commanding us to live a sanctified life.
I think he does do some admonishing, but to say that we are not commanded to live a sanctified life is to fall short of what Scripture says. God says be ye holy as I am Holy! That's not a suggestion. That's a command.He is admonishing us to allow Christ to completely control us, therby living the ultimate sanctified life.
Bob have you not been following this thread? That is what this whole thing has been about. James 1:21 alone shows us that the soul is not saved, because he said by receiving the engrafted word it is ABLE to save your souls. That means the soul is not in a saved state even though they are saved. There are only three parts to man, a body, soul and spirit. We know that our bodies are not going to be saved until after death or after the rapture. James 1:21 tells us that our souls are not saved yet, so that elimiates two out of the three options, so by default guess what "was" saved in these individuals?You have to clear up the "lost but still saved anyway" doctrine - from scripture to make this work.
In Christ,
Bob
I'm talking about sanctification, not justification.Quote:
Oasis-A "true Christian" is one whose life reflects the acceptance of Jesus Christ as their personal Savior.
J. JumpThat's not what Scripture says. Scripture says those that believe are saved, not those that believe and reflect.
I'm talking about Jesus Christ. Lord and Savior. How much clearer does someone have to be?Quote:
Oasis-They have faith that Christ is who and what He says He is, and they are willing to place their life in His hands.
J. Jump-There is a difference between having faith in Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God, and Jesus as the Christ, the Annointed One, Messiah and King.
I've read some of your posts over the last several months. Judging by what I've read, I could tell you a dog has four legs and you would find a way to disagree with it. You do a good job of turning Scripture into a cryptic puzzle without using any Scripture to do it.Quote:
Oasis-FAITH obeys and endures. The whole of Hebrews 11 attests to it.
J. Jump-With all due respect you are confusing eternally saving faith and sanctifying faith. The book of Hebrews is speaking of faith "after" eternal salvation has been complete.
Quote:
Oasis-Living faith is the mark of sanctification of the believer.
J. Jump-EXACTLY. Again this has been my whole point the entire time. We are not talking about eternal saving faith we are talking about sanctifying faith. They are not the same thing. And just because you have faith that eternally saves you does not mean that you will have faith that sanctifies you. And James tells us that even if you do have that faith, but it doesn't motivate you to the good works you were saved for then it is a dead faith that will not save you.
Quote:
Oasis-What I mean by "true Christian" is someone that has not only head knowledge of the truth, but has experienced the heart change(change of nature)that accompanies it.
J. Jump-Again Scripture just says we have to believe to be saved. Anything that adds to or takes away from that is outside the bounds of Scripture. A Christian (there is no such thing as a "true" Christian and a "false" Christian) is a person that has believed in Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God, Who shed His blood and died on behalf of that individual, who is a sinner. That's it. Nothing else.
Quote:
Oasis-James is not commanding us to live a sanctified life.
J. Jump-Sorry, but the language of the text does not support your statment. James 1:21 is a command. James says receive. That's not a suggestion, but an imperitive. It is a command.
Quote:
Oasis-He is admonishing us to allow Christ to completely control us, therby living the ultimate sanctified life.
J. Jump-I think he does do some admonishing, but to say that we are not commanded to live a sanctified life is to fall short of what Scripture says. God says be ye holy as I am Holy! That's not a suggestion. That's a command.
How can you be talking about sanctification when you were talking about "true" Christians being ones that believed in Jesus Christ as their personal Savior. That's not sanctification that is eternal justification. Sanctification is accept Jesus as the Christ, the Lord, Annointed One, King, Messiah. The two are not the same thing.I'm talking about sanctification, not justification.
Again when you speak you try to combine the two. And unfortunately Christendom does the same thing. Accepting Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord are not the same thing and most generally don't occur at the same time.I'm talking about Jesus Christ. Lord and Savior. How much clearer does someone have to be?
That's a comical statement seeing as I'm the one that is trying to get people to just read the text and don't add anything into it. This particular Scripture text is not a puzzle at all. It's a simple statement in English that one ought to understand. The problem is it flies in the face of what a good portion of Christendom teaches. So instead of eating crow Christendom just continues to dance around this passage and others like it, adding to and taking away as they see fit.You do a good job of turning Scripture into a cryptic puzzle without using any Scripture to do it.
BobRyan said:The problem is that James does not say "I am just writing to those whose SPIRIT is saved but SOUL is NOT saved".
The idea of "spirit saved while SOUL not saved" can be found clearly on this thread STATED by posters but NEVER in scripture.
you have to ASSUME that James MEANT to say "is able to SAVE your soul but of course your spirit is ALREADY saved" -- even though it is not in James 1 at all.
When Scripture says that "Christ is able to save to the uttermost" it is NOT saying "you are not saved by Christ for it is something he has yet to do -- to save you as stated". You insert that "IS ABLE TO SAVE the soul" means "ALL of you have unsaved souls that are reading this text". Such is not the case - James is not writing and saying "I know you all have unsaved souls so let me tell you how to get them saved" rather he is affirming the Christian belief in salvation and the mechanism by which it works.
Notice what Paul said to Timothy about Scripture in 2Tim 3:15-16 "Scripture" IS sufficient to lead to salvation - was not a way of telling Timohty "you are not yet saved"!!
In each instance you have admitted that it is NOT in the text so you have to INSERT it based on "some other text" as yet unquoted.
in Christ,
Bob
I'm not sure I understand what J.Jump is talking about. It sounds as though he's saying the spirit is saved, but the soul is yet to be saved.
DQuixote said:That's exactly what he is saying, Amy. Your interpretation is far and away the correct one. Let me make a position statement at this point:
Jump's is a tragic misinterpretation of scripture. Those who believe it believe that the spirit is saved, but the "soul" has a good chance of punishment. Someone who doesn't have a clue dreamed that one up, and Jump has 'jumped' on the bandwagon. I hope he isn't a pastor, evangelist, or Sunday School teacher!
Soul, in context, simply means "you". In Jump's belief system, part of "you" will be saved, but another part may end up in hell.
Read the "God's Word" translation of James 1:21 :
So get rid of all immoral behavior and all the wicked things you do. Humbly accept the word that God has placed in you. This word can save you.
"You", here, is plural, meaning "all of you." In other translations, "your soul" is literally "you, all of you," as well.
ψυχας soul, noun - accusative plural feminine
psuche psoo-khay'
life, mind, us, you, you all.
So what does "save" mean, in context? Right up front, it has zero, zilch, nada to do with salvation, in this context.