1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Septuagint real?

Discussion in '2005 Archive' started by Phillip, Feb 15, 2005.

  1. Phillip

    Phillip <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have noticed some people who believe the Septuagint is a forgery. Please provide proof either way?

    As a side-note, did anybody catch the poster who said it was a "forgery of the gospels" and I said that all you had to do was look at the "Septuagint" to see that this was not true?"

    Meaning the Septuagint is the OLD TESTAMENT in GREEK!
     
  2. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    KJV-onlyists have to discredit the LXX. As soon as it can be established that the Bible of Jesus and the Apostles was authoritative despite being demonstrably flawed, KJV-onlyism explodes in a blast of logic.
     
  3. Phillip

    Phillip <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ransom, yeah I know--isn't it great? :D [​IMG]
     
  4. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,396
    Likes Received:
    672
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Most of the OT quotes in the NT have come from Greek sources that many scholars say match the LXX.
     
  5. Charles Meadows

    Charles Meadows New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    1
    Robycop is right. Most NT quotes of the OT match the LXX much better than the MT - some are even word for word from the LXX.

    I think there were fragments of the Greek OT unearthed at Qumran as well.

    The LXX is real - that's not debatable.
     
  6. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,537
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Remakable, the one who promulgated this rumor is the same one who proclaims the doctrine of "advanced revelation" with no proof.


    HankD
     
  7. Trotter

    Trotter <img src =/6412.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    4,818
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That doesn't keep a bunch of 'em from taking up the war chant...

    In Christ,
    Trotter
     
  8. superdave

    superdave New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    2,055
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not only that, it was produced by scholars in the archetypical evil city of Alexandria, hence, it cannot be good. ;)

    "Can anything Good come out of Nazareth?"
     
  9. Glory2God

    Glory2God New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Anybody out there got a copy??? Read the ENTIRE preface, very enlightening. Remember, it was supposedly written about 150 B.C. [​IMG]
     
  10. Trotter

    Trotter <img src =/6412.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    4,818
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Not in English it wasn't [​IMG]

    In Christ,
    Trotter
     
  11. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,396
    Likes Received:
    672
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The AV translators wrote"

    1 While God would be known only in Jacob, and have his Name great in Israel, and in none other place, while the dew lay on Gideon's fleece only, and all the earth besides was dry; [See S.August.lib.12. contra Faust.c.32.] then for one and the same people, which spake all of them the language of Canaan, that is, Hebrew, one and the same original in Hebrew was sufficient.


    • 2 But when the fullness of time drew near, that the Sun of righteousness, the Son of God, should come into the world, whom God ordained to be a reconciliation through faith in his blood, not of the Jew only, but also of the Greek, yea, of all them that were scattered abroad; then, lo, it pleased the Lord to stir up the spirit of a Greek prince (Greek for descent and language), even of Ptolomy Philadelph, King of Egypt, to procure the translating of the Book of God out of Hebrew into Greek.

    • 3 This is the translation of the Seventy interpreters, commonly so called, which prepared the way for our Saviour among the Gentiles by written preaching, as Saint John Baptist did among the Jews by vocal.


    The KJVOs cannot deny the existence of the LXX in BC times without denying the veracity of the AV translators. Ptolemy Philadelph ruled Egypt from 285-246 BC.
     
  12. Pastor_Bob

    Pastor_Bob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2002
    Messages:
    3,960
    Likes Received:
    228
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The author of Hebrews (Paul IMHO) apparently quoted the LXX rendering of Proverbs 3:12 in Hebrews 12:6.

    Proverbs 3:12 For whom the LORD loveth he correcteth; even as a father the son in whom he delighteth. (KJV)

    Heb 12:6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. (KJV)

    The last clause the Septuagint translates, "and chasteneth every son whom he receiveth."
     
  13. El_Guero

    El_Guero New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,714
    Likes Received:
    0
    Phillip

    Doubters would need to show some support that the Septuigint is NOT an accurate and historical document.

    Since it is traditionally considered historical and accurate*, the burden of proof falls upon those that doubt and not upon those of us that believe.

    * Reference: the preface & introduction of,
    Brenton, Septuagint, Hendrickson Publishers, 1992. page iv.
     
  14. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,396
    Likes Received:
    672
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Also, El Guero, they'd hafta prove the AV translators were wrong about the LXX.
     
  15. Slambo

    Slambo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Proof is there IS no proof for a BC LXX.
    The lack of an extant bc LXX is proof e'nuff.
     
  16. Matt Black

    Matt Black Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    11,548
    Likes Received:
    193
    The LXX contains the Apocrypha (or Deutero-canonicals, depending on your POV) - does that make any difference?

    Yours in Christ

    Matt
     
  17. av1611jim

    av1611jim New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,511
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wonder. I have seen one side argue that the LXX is true. I have seen another side say it isn't.

    What I want to knoow is this. What Rabbinical evidence for its existence? And for its acceptance? I ask about Rabbinical evidence because I think the OT Rabbis and Scribes would have much to say concerning this "LXX". That is IF they sent 70+ scholars to Egypt to translate the Book of God for the Egyptian/Greek Jews, 200 +/- years before Christ.

    I will try a google and see what I come up with and get back to this.

    See ya later!

    In HIS service;
    Jim
     
  18. Phillip

    Phillip <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    No more than it does for the KJV or the Geneva to contain the Apocrypha. [​IMG]
     
  19. Phillip

    Phillip <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    Interesting point Jim. How about Josephus. I know he didn't mention much about Jesus, but he was quite heavy into the Jewish history, I would think that he might mention it. Does anybody know? I have read a lot of his materials, but he wrote so much its like reading Mathew Henry's COMPLETE book and then some.
     
  20. natters

    natters New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    "The earliest writer who gives an account of the Septuagint version is Aristobulus, a Jew who lived at the commencement of the second century B.C."

    From this article, written by Breton who translated the Septuagint into English in the early 1800's:
    http://www.bible-researcher.com/brenton1.html
     
Loading...