Setback for non-Republicans

In what is a clear setback to Democrats and Constitution Party members as well as Libertarians and Greens, President Uribe of Colombia won re-election in a landslide in Colombia on Sunday. This gives a round of applause to US foreign policy in Latin America and cements the friendship between Colombians and Americans, especially thwarting the Constitution Party in the USA.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060529/ts_nm/colombia_election_dc_10

 

What nonsense you have written, Ken. The majority of your party favors the legalization of drugs and would not have fought the drug lords in Colombia.

As for the Constitution Party, they wanted to abandon the Colombian middle class to be murdered by the FARC and the drug lords in the name of saving money. The Constitution Party was very specific that they wanted total withdrawal from Colombia. This is a huge setback for the Constitution Party.

Actually, President Uribe, whose father was murdered by terrorists, has been successful in fighting terrorism and has been a good friend to the USA. Politically, his re-election vindicates Bush in Latin America and in the war against terror, causing another political setback to those who need American failure in order to win in November.

 

Too bad, Poncho, but the Constitution Party has a clear platform of abandoning Colombia, which would have meant the murder of the middle-class. Therefore, it is your party that would have installed a totalitarian government of communism allied with drug lords in Colombia by default.

Let's correct your purposeful factual errors, Poncho. George W. was addicted to alcohol, not drugs, as you claim. And George H.W. was not responsible for Iran-Contra, as you falsely claim, Poncho, but Ronald Reagan was responsible for that deal and said so publically.

Poncho, people like you seem so enamored by power that you don't care whose blood is shed in order for you to rule. President Uribe's father was murdered by terrorists so he understands something that the Constitution Party does not understand--how to fight terror. Poncho, you jest at scars. That is the reason, Poncho, that you have suffered a setback last Sunday because one corner of the world held a free election and the forces of freedom and democracy won a victory politically. It would take a bloodbath in Colombia for the Constitution Party to come to power in this country and the Constitution Party platform of abandoning Colombia was designed to cause a bloodbath there.

 

Here is a link to the Constitution Party's objections to helping Colombia:

http://www.constitutionparty.com/news.php?aid=48

Here is what the Constitution Party said in part, "...This is another New World Order adventure in which American lives will be lost for no good purpose unless we can provide leadership in cutting off the money for this unconstitutional activity. "

The Constitution Party received a massive setback with the landslide re-election victory of Colombian President Uribe.

 

The record is clear that the Constitution Party would have abandoned Colombia--there is no debate about that.

President Uribe's re-election shows that the common people of Latin America can reject communism at the ballot box and can reject terrorism.

This is a severe setback for the Constitution Party, not to mention the Libertarian Party, which supports the legalization of the narcotics mobsters.

 

I don't know the basis for the statement that it defeats mobsters to have their product legalized. What evidence is there for that statement? How am I siding with them by arresting them and imprisoning them? I doubt if they would consider that being allied with them since they seem to engage in military battles to prevent their arrest. I suppose that liberals would also argue that the legalization of abortion has defeated the abortionists by making the product safe and legal and that making abortion illegal would increase the power and profits of the abortionists in the medical profession.

 

The legalization of gambling by the states has actually increased the amount of money spent on gambling. As for the alcohol industry, the legalization of alcohol has increased the profits of the alcohol industry and legalization of abortion has made the abortionists richer than ever. What abortionists ever thought that the Democrat Party would include in their plank a statement calling for legalized abortion?

Legalized drugs would allow the Libertarians and the Constitution Party members to ignore the plight of the addicted and would turn countries such as Colombia over to the drug producers in the name of saving money, which was the position of the Constitution Party.

The re-election of Colombian President Uribe by 62% in a landslide is a setback for the legalization of drugs as called for by the Libertarian Party and is a setback for the withdrawal from the drug war as called for by the Constitution Party. The vindication of the Bush policy in Colombia is a set back for the Democrats who need for Bush to fail so that they can win.

 

I am not sure what you mean, Ken. Do you mean that it is not a setback for the trafficers of death or do you mean that the Libertarian Party platform calling for the legalization of drugs will be passed?

Here is what your party calls for, Ken, in case there are some here that are not aware of what you stand for:

Repeal all laws establishing criminal or civil penalties for the use of drugs. Repeal laws that infringe upon individual rights to be secure in our persons, homes, and property as protected by the Fourth Amendment. Stop the use of "anti-crime" measures such as profiling or civil asset forfeiture that reduce the standard of proof historically borne by government in prosecutions. Stop prosecuting accused non-violent drug offenders, and pardon those previously convicted.

http://www.lp.org/issues/platform_all.shtml#warondru