1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Seventy-five Problems with Central Baptist Seminary's Book

Discussion in 'Books & Publications Forum' started by Logos1560, Dec 10, 2018.

  1. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,604
    Likes Received:
    464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Streeter, Lloyd. Seventy-five Problems with Central Baptist Seminary's Book The Bible Version Debate.
    LaSalle, IL: First Baptist Church, 2001.

    This book is based on typical erroneous human KJV-only reasoning. A number of the problems that Streeter assumes or claims concerning the book that he criticizes actually would indicate problems in his own imperfect KJV-only reasoning. Perhaps this author is guilty of "the generalization and dishonest characterization" (p. 41) of which he accused others.

    Streeter claimed: "The King James Bible has never been revised. It is a ruse to say it has been revised" (p. 54). Streeter again claimed: "But it is a hoax to say that the KJV has been revised" (p. 54).

    The two above claims are simply not true. The false claim would be to say that the 1611 edition of the KJV has not been revised. The author is somewhat uninformed and misinformed concerning the actual facts concerning editions of the KJV and the actual revisions in them.
     
  2. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Much revision between the 1611 and 1769, correct?
     
  3. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,604
    Likes Received:
    464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Lloyd Streeter claimed: "The KJV has remained exactly the same for nearly 250 years, and VIRTUALLY the same for 350 years" (p. 55).

    Evidently Streeter assumes and claims that his present post-1900 KJV edition is "exactly the same" as the 1769 KJV, when his assumption or claim is simply not true.
     
  4. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The changes were real and legit, not just "window dressing"l as the KJVO claim!
     
  5. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,604
    Likes Received:
    464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Lloyd Streeter claimed: "It appears that these same old canards are repeated--one professor copying another--without any original thinking" (p. 93).

    Perhaps Streeter is guilty of what he accuses others. Streeter evidently blindly repeated claims made by D. A. Waite without checking them out for himself and without any original thinking. Streeter in effect repeated Waite's factually untrue claim that "there were only 421 phonetic changes (changes in any sound of any word), according to Waite" between the 1611 edition and today's KJV (p. 55).
     
  6. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,604
    Likes Received:
    464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Lloyd Streeter claimed: "All of this business about the KJV being the Word of God only to a 'DEGREE' and saying that it is not inspired 'IN THE SAME SENSE' as the original text is to downplay the inspiration of the Bible, the only Bible most people have" (p. 46).
     
Loading...