This is my favorite doctrinal subject, so I will, without upsetting some by providing reading material- for what sane person wants to read 50 pages or learn the meaning of theological terms which are NOT, like "Trinity", found in the Bible ?
If you are really interested in the Person of Christ, possible you will answer with your view on a question. If you are not interested, then, indeed, I have wrongly overestimated my understand of this place. My mistake-sorry.
1. Does the name"Son of God" indicate that the human nature of Christ is eternally role subordinate to the Father? YES, Grudem, NO Gregory of Nazianzus.
2. Are there three faculties of will in God? That issue if true, supports the doctrine of the Son's eternal submission to the Father. YES, A. Strong. NO, John of Damascus..
3. As Christ is sent by the Father, doers that mean that the Father is eternally role dominant over the Son? YES, Grudem. NO, Augustine.
4. As the Son is seated at God's right hand, does that mean that the Son is of a lower rank in authority? YES, Dahms. NO, Murray.
5. Since the Father creates through the Son, does that mean the Son is role subordinate? YES, Grudem. NO, Gregory of Nyssa.
6. Does 1 Cor 11:3 teach the the Father is the authority over God the Son? YES, Ware. NO, Chemnitz.
7. Does Philippians 2:6 mean that while Christ was in God's nature, He did not grasp at being God's equal? Yes, Burk( on the articular infinitive) . NO, Athanasius.
8. Was Christ's divine nature confined in a body? YES, Fee. NO, Calvin.
9. Did Christ's divine nature suffer? YES, Frame. NO, Shedd.
10. Does Philippians 2:7 mean that Christ, upon incarnating gave up the use of any divine attribute?
YES, Evans. NO, Jowers.
11. Is the divine nature of Christ only that which personalizes Christ incarnate? YES, Crisp. NO, Morris.
12. Are there two faculties of wills in Christ (human and divine) YES, Hodge. NO, Strong.
If there are actually theologians on a forum called Baptist THEOLOGY, please consider informing us of your views on these question with evidence for your opinion. Thanks!
If you are really interested in the Person of Christ, possible you will answer with your view on a question. If you are not interested, then, indeed, I have wrongly overestimated my understand of this place. My mistake-sorry.
1. Does the name"Son of God" indicate that the human nature of Christ is eternally role subordinate to the Father? YES, Grudem, NO Gregory of Nazianzus.
2. Are there three faculties of will in God? That issue if true, supports the doctrine of the Son's eternal submission to the Father. YES, A. Strong. NO, John of Damascus..
3. As Christ is sent by the Father, doers that mean that the Father is eternally role dominant over the Son? YES, Grudem. NO, Augustine.
4. As the Son is seated at God's right hand, does that mean that the Son is of a lower rank in authority? YES, Dahms. NO, Murray.
5. Since the Father creates through the Son, does that mean the Son is role subordinate? YES, Grudem. NO, Gregory of Nyssa.
6. Does 1 Cor 11:3 teach the the Father is the authority over God the Son? YES, Ware. NO, Chemnitz.
7. Does Philippians 2:6 mean that while Christ was in God's nature, He did not grasp at being God's equal? Yes, Burk( on the articular infinitive) . NO, Athanasius.
8. Was Christ's divine nature confined in a body? YES, Fee. NO, Calvin.
9. Did Christ's divine nature suffer? YES, Frame. NO, Shedd.
10. Does Philippians 2:7 mean that Christ, upon incarnating gave up the use of any divine attribute?
YES, Evans. NO, Jowers.
11. Is the divine nature of Christ only that which personalizes Christ incarnate? YES, Crisp. NO, Morris.
12. Are there two faculties of wills in Christ (human and divine) YES, Hodge. NO, Strong.
If there are actually theologians on a forum called Baptist THEOLOGY, please consider informing us of your views on these question with evidence for your opinion. Thanks!
