• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Straight Party

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As long as I have been voting, our state’s general elections offered the ability to vote “straight party.” Straight party voting gives voters the option of completing their entire ballot with a single mark – a mark that votes for every candidate running for a specific party (e.g. Democrat, Green, Libertarian, Republican, etc.). This year we did not have that option. In 2017, the Texas state legislature passed HB25, ending the practice of straight party voting – beginning with the 2020 election.

From the standpoint of politics, straight-party voting in Texas apparently favored the Democrats. At the least, it seems both the Republican and Democratic parties thought so. The Republican Party is the majority in Congress and hold the governor’s seat, so they are most responsible for passing the bill. Second, since the Democratic sued over the change in March 2020 (nearly 3 years after the bill passed), they must have thought straight-party voting helped their cause.

As a practical matter, straight-party voting helps “down-ballot” candidates – candidates whom voters often do not know and might not vote for otherwise. Straight-party voting may also expedite the voting process, making a quick one-stop experience rather than wading through each selection individually. Ultimately, it benefits parties and election officials much more than it benefits citizens.

As a matter of principle, I do not like straight-party voting. A position is no better than the person who holds it. While party alignment reflects something about principles, voters should give serious thought to the beliefs, experience, and qualifications of each individual candidate. In practice, even if I knew ahead of time that I would be voting for candidates who all belonged to one party, I never chose to vote for the party, but selected each candidate individually.

Christians who are “all in” for a “straight party” probably are neither careful voters nor careful Christians. Christian culture is created in Christ, is prescribed in the New Testament, is unique, and exists independently of world cultures. Christian culture is neither Jewish nor Gentile (Romans 10:12, 1 Corinthians 10:32, Colossians 3:11). “Christian politics” is neither Democrat nor Republican, but seeks consistently to follow biblical principles, and will dissent from parties or candidates when they diverge from biblical principles. The culture of gathering believers – which exists outside of and independently from world governments, cultures, and standards – is universal and permanent, having neither command to change nor necessity to conform. We must be “all in” for Jesus Christ and his word.
 

Squire Robertsson

Administrator
Administrator
In my overwhelmingly Pelosi Democrat part of California, I vote a straight Republican ticket in the partisan elections. It's my way of voting a protest vote against Pelosi and Company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roy

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In my overwhelmingly Pelosi Democrat part of California, I vote a straight Republican ticket in the partisan elections. It's my way of voting a protest vote against Pelosi and Company.
Do y'all have the "straight-party" single select option, or are you individually voting for all Republicans?
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I voted straight party this time simply because I have decided that, regardless of the office or individual running, I will no longer vote for a "good" person if they profess to be a "D".
The D party has become so evil that I will no longer trust the judgment of one who claims that association. Continual association with evil in a "compatible" manner will eventually contaminate even the "GOOD"!

Just ousted a state senator (2 or 3 terms?) that is a "good" person - but a "D" - primarily because of his stance on abortion.

A D before a name is the death knell for a candidate IMHO!!! The D defines the end product AFAIC!!
 

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
When the discussion about our house bill was going on, one report (whether accurate or not) said that only eight states had straight-party voting. I guess now there are only seven.
 

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Individually, in over forty years of voting, I've never seen a "straight" party option on a California ballot.
I don't remember seeing it recently, looked it up and North Carolina got rid of it in 2014.

Nowadays it's pretty easy to research candidates, even for the "non-partisan" positions.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
I totally agree with the OP!!!
When I lived in WV, back around 1996 - they had a Straight Ticket option.
I refused to use it. I vote for individuals.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
I was just thinking - suppose there is an elderly person - and it is extremly hard for him to punch 10 different holds - so Straight voting makes it eaiser on him?

Thoughts?
 

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I totally agree with the OP!!!
When I lived in WV, back around 1996 - they had a Straight Ticket option.
I refused to use it. I vote for individuals.
If I researched the candidates and know I'm voting for all of one party anyways, then what difference does it make?

It's not like there's a moral superiority to marking ten ovals versus marking one if the result is the same.
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
In Missouri, years ago, there was straight party option. When I first started voting, I voted straight party and then voted individual candidates as well. I later learned doing that voids the ballot. It didn’t count.

Maybe that’s why it was dropped.

peace to you
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
What? That doesn't make any sense.
There are some local races where national politics don’t fit. There are local sheriffs, mayors, commissioners, judges, etc, that are popular in the area regardless of party, as well as scandals unique to the area that effect the vote.

peace to you
 

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
In Missouri, years ago, there was straight party option. When I first started voting, I voted straight party and then voted individual candidates as well. I later learned doing that voids the ballot. It didn’t count.
That’s the sort of thing that programming should flag for you with a big warning. It’s too easy. There’s no good reason not to notify the voter that his vote will be invalid if cast as is.
 

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There are some local races where national politics don’t fit. There are local sheriffs, mayors, commissioners, judges, etc, that are popular in the area regardless of party, as well as scandals unique to the area that effect the vote.

peace to you
Perhaps, but that has nothing to do with the scenario that I presented and Salty responded to.
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
Perhaps, but that has nothing to do with the scenario that I presented and Salty responded to.
Ok, I apologize for commenting on a private conversation. Salty can respond if he wants to. Maybe I’ll see the context when he does.

peace to you
 

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Ok, I apologize for commenting on a private conversation. Salty can respond if he wants to. Maybe I’ll see the context when he does.

peace to you

If I came off standoffish, that wasn't my intention and I apologize.

My intent was to refute the point that "voting straight party ticket precludes critical thinking about the candidates."

And I fail to see how "a local candidates might lose a vote" factors in. If you've done your research and the candidates you have decided to vote for all belong to one party, a straight party ticket vote does nothing but save time and ink.
 

Squire Robertsson

Administrator
Administrator
In my locale, local offices (city council, school boards, water district, the county board of supervisors, sheriff, and conty recorder/tax collector) are "non-partisan". So, there voting a straight party ticket doesn't affect them.
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
If I came off standoffish, that wasn't my intention and I apologize.

My intent was to refute the point that "voting straight party ticket precludes critical thinking about the candidates."

And I fail to see how "a local candidates might lose a vote" factors in. If you've done your research and the candidates you have decided to vote for all belong to one party, a straight party ticket vote does nothing but save time and ink.
Ok, I see the point. It only hurts down ticket if you don’t do your research.

A lot of folks will vote straight party without knowing anything about down ballot candidates, which is fine because they trust the party.

Factor in a couple of generations of such voting straight “party”, and you could end up with an uninformed electorate.

peace to you
 
Top