KJB1611reader
Member
Dear community,
I was checking the 1602 Bishop's Bible and noticed there were marginal notes saying 'this part/this verse is only in the old translation.'
Those parts and verses are not in the 1611 and verse numbers rewritten.
Its not shewn as marked off in the 1602.
There is alot of added commentary of early Father's notes regarding verses in there and information notes.
Though, very amazing is the first time as I mentioned before in 1 Esdras 5:5/9 there is a note saying this verse(s) had corruption.
This note wasn't in the precious versions, even the bishop's.
Shawn
I was checking the 1602 Bishop's Bible and noticed there were marginal notes saying 'this part/this verse is only in the old translation.'
Those parts and verses are not in the 1611 and verse numbers rewritten.
Its not shewn as marked off in the 1602.
There is alot of added commentary of early Father's notes regarding verses in there and information notes.
Though, very amazing is the first time as I mentioned before in 1 Esdras 5:5/9 there is a note saying this verse(s) had corruption.
This note wasn't in the precious versions, even the bishop's.
Shawn