There are very few seminary trained men who would want to be associated with the KJVonly movement, for instance.
Bob, I understand this is mere opinion on your behalf, for there is no way to know the truth to this statement. Other than your own circle of the world, how could you know? Let me ask you something, what is your personal experience with what you term, and many others on this board, "KJVonlyism"? What has caused your obvious distaste for those settled on KJV?
I've seen people on both sides of the KJV stance jump into the fray, and what bothers me more than anything is how eager we all can be to give our "opinions". If anyone of us was to fellowship with true "christians and ministers of God", bible version, quite honestly, should be one of the lesser things that concerns us. If someone is acting unchristian, KJV or otherwise, seek out others to fellowship with.
I know several "KJVonly" individuals I wouldn't spit on if they were on fire; know some others I'd do the same way. The reason is because I feel I'd be getting in the way of God's judgment on their lives.
To answer the response of what was originally asked on this post, if God truly leads a man to a church, the least of the churches worries should be his seminary training, unless you are convinced the seminary he attended is anti-God: in any way.
It has been my experience that some churches appropriate seminary training with Godly wisdom, when anyone who is honest will admit, couldn't be further from the truth. If a church is seeking the right man to fill the shepherd's post, hopefully the ones in charge of securing candidates will be following the will of the Lord, and parties involoved will be earnestly praying. If not, it wouldn't matter who filled the post.
Spam {Paul}