• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

That debilitating disease - atheist darwinism: What say you?

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
And then on the other hand - we have "Eric"

Eric said --
The only one bashing anyone here is YOU

AS the conclusion to being reminded of his ...

Eric - from page 1 ...
Yeah, Kennedy, with his rabid conspiratorialism, and everyone against good capitalistic Christian America.
Meanwhile, people like him forget that racism was held long before Darwin

...

Eric in a more recent post --

You're a compulsive liar, and highly delusionary who makes up arguments just to fight with people, even when they're basically on your side

So let's see. We are supposed to be looking at the damage being done by the atheist darwinist doctrines inserted into the church -- but Eric insists we bash Kennedy instead and then slander me.

Wonder why that is Eric's "reaction" to having Atheist darwinism exposed on this thread?

Well - pursuing that line of questioning would be an "Eric-thread" instead of a thread addressing the problem of atheist darwinist doctrines mixed-like-poison with Christian doctrine.
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Naturalistic evolution has clear consequences that Charles Darwin understood perfectly. 1) No gods worth having exist; 2) no life after death exists; 3) no ultimate foundation for ethics exists; 4) no ultimate meaning in life exists; and 5) human free will is nonexistent. ~ William Provine

Evolution is the greatest engine of atheism ever invented. ~ William Provine
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Should we bash and slander William Provine for being so honest on this point?

I think not.
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
What about some rational thought put into evaluating Richard Dawins observations in this recent post here -- on this very thread?

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=828843&postcount=56

Do we do well to "pretend" that he knows nothing about the "intent and purpose" of atheist darwinism when in fact HE IS one of the most leading and well known of atheist darwinists today??

Why turn a blind eye to the facts brothers and sisters? Why pretend that we can "mix" that with Truth?

Why suppose that a compromised atheist-accomodating doctrine of "God created the World but not so's you would notice" would be "a perfect fit" for the Christian church instead of accepting the truth of Romans 1 and "What is CLEARLY SEEN" by unbelieving pagans who "are without excuse" precisely BECAUSE they clearly SEE it!!?
 

Eric B

Active Member
Site Supporter
Wouldn't it be great if we could "address the topic" of the OP??
Well - pursuing that line of questioning would be an "Eric-thread" instead of a thread addressing the problem of atheist darwinist doctrines mixed-like-poison with Christian doctrine.
Then why don't you leave me alone, instead of turning the thread into a trial, making all these accusations. All I did was make a simple comment on a teacher, and it was my right to do so. Nobody asked you to go after me for what you think my motives were. (That's what turned this into "an Eric thread". UTEOTW, whom you were provoking with this thread, is not even paying attention to it). You can question why I think that about Kennedy; we can debate how much Darwinism is or is not at fault for Naziism, but you had no right to make accusations of my motives for opposing his teaching.
BobRyan said:
And then on the other hand - we have "Eric"
AS the conclusion to being reminded of his ...
So let's see. We are supposed to be looking at the damage being done by the atheist darwinist doctrines inserted into the church -- but Eric insists we bash Kennedy instead and then slander me.

Wonder why that is Eric's "reaction" to having Atheist darwinism exposed on this thread?
"Slander" you? I'm only exposing you for your sin. why couldn't I make a point of disagreement with Kennedy without you comign here claiming that I am "reacting to atheist Darwisnim being exposed". That is a LIE!!
Should we bash and slander William Provine for being so honest on this point?
What your hard head doesn't seem to realize, is that I have no problem with Provine or anyone else. I disgreed with some of Kennedy's rhetoric. You are the one who then makes me out to be against all exposing of atheist Darwinism. Why then haven't I been in any of the other threads you have started on this subject? I have even disputed UTEOTW in the past, and was thinking of giving him some questions regarding his apparently wholesale acceptance of evolution.

So you have the nerve to keep saying I'm "slandering" you when you keep telling this lie on me. You accuse me of bashing Kennedy for calling his rhetoric "rabid conspiratorialism", when you say stuff like this about me:

Why not get a grip? Why be on the wrong side in EVERY issue

Have I even said anything close to that? You have such a persecution complex, but you can sure dish out a lot of bullying and taunting yourself. I did not come here bashing you, but when you start lying against me, and then accusing me of lying, bashing and slandering you, I call you the liar and hypocrite you are being. Now if that's "bashing", then stop doing it! (I repeat, you have to give account to all of this before God, and pointing fingers and repeating the same thing over and over won't work with Him).
And keep it up, it's going to the moderators!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jim1999

<img src =/Jim1999.jpg>
Eric, I would ignore his charges. I have discovered anyone who is not a member of the Seventh Day Adventist cult is an atheist evolutionist. I can't understand for the life of me why he is still around on the BaptistBoard. He would be gone by now under the old board.

Cheers,

Jim

PS. I have been a Theistic evolutionist since, perhaps, before he was born, and a baptist, and sound evangelical minister of the Bible.
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Jim - claiming full acceptance of darwinian evolutionism (in the true Anglican fashion) seems to find Eric's arguments to be in the same spirit as his own.

Frankly - I have to agree.

Hint - watch the number of times where UTEOTW bashes intelligent design (the center-piece of theistic evolution) and Jim comes in to defend the Romans 1 point of Intelligent Design.

So far that number seems to be "zero".

Like Eric - Jim only snipes at anyone exposing the blunders of atheist darwinism.

So far - that rule has been pretty useful in predicting Jim's posts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
QuoteBob asks Eric:
Why not get a grip? Why be on the wrong side in EVERY issue
Eric responds -- innexplicably,

Have I even said anything close to that? You have such a persecution complex,

What in the world are you talking about with that kind of response?

What is the "close to that" that you reference???
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Naturalistic evolution has clear consequences that Charles Darwin understood perfectly. 1) No gods worth having exist; 2) no life after death exists; 3) no ultimate foundation for ethics exists; 4) no ultimate meaning in life exists; and 5) human free will is nonexistent. ~ William Provine

Evolution is the greatest engine of atheism ever invented. ~ William Provine



Quote:
Should we bash and slander William Provine for being so honest on this point?
Eric ...
What your hard head doesn't seem to realize, is that I have no problem with Provine or anyone else...

Eric
Eric - from page 1 ...
Yeah, Kennedy, with his rabid conspiratorialism, and everyone against good capitalistic Christian America.
Meanwhile, people like him forget that racism was held long before Darwin

...

Eric in a more recent post --

You're a compulsive liar, and highly delusionary who makes up arguments just to fight with people, even when they're basically on your side

But then of course - that would make this "a thread about Eric" and certainly that is totally off topic -- no matter what his antics.
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Was Darwin RIGHT to SEE that his atheist views lead away from truth, fact, light and the Bible?

Is Dawkins right when HE TOO shows how this contradiction between the Word of God and atheist darwinism " is CLEARLY SEEN" even by atheists?

Is Patterson right when he claims that faith in atheist darwinism is really a kind of "anti knowledge"??

When darwinist here run away from Romans 1, logic, reason and rational thought - do they SHOW the glaring results of having adopted faith in the system starts with "there is no God" - to the point that they strenuously object TO EVOLUTIONISTS that want to admit to seeing "CLEARLY things IN NATURE that reveal the invisible attributes of a higher intelligence"??

Would you be willing to add the lethal mix of atheist darwinism to the Gospel - to your church leadership, to any Christian expected to hold to rational thought?

Or are all these sources and examples merely "so many more data points to ignore"??
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
OP
On this thread - it was pointed out that the reason-debilitating faith-destroying Gospel-contradicting disease "Atheist Darwinism" took a once-believer like Darwin and turned him into an atheist (agnostic at best) --

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost...9&postcount=12

On this thread we saw UTETOW falter then fail then totally implode in all areas of reason as argument after argument in favor of atheist darwinism was fully exposed at a level that even a child could quickly grasp!

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost...&postcount=177
http://www.baptistboard.com/showthre...073#post822073

He simply adopts a "rant and run" even when it comes to his own initiatives!

There we saw an entire series of links on this board exposing his complete failure to deal with facts when there is "no place to hide".

The point of this small segment was to show the blatant effects of the debilitating disease known as atheist darwinism as it was demonstrated in areas of logic and reason where there are NO places for the atheist darwinist argument "to hide".

So easy and basic - a child could see it.

But some have struggled with that simple concept on this thread.
 

Eric B

Active Member
Site Supporter
BobRyan said:
QuoteBob asks Eric:
Why not get a grip? Why be on the wrong side in EVERY issue

What in the world are you talking about with that kind of response?

What is the "close to that" that you reference???
You're the one claiming that I'm here "sniping" people, but all I did was make a simple comment about Kennedy's rhetoric. Then you come claiming that this places me on the side of the atheist Darwinists, and then "bashing" you when I point out that you are lying, and then you make the statement above. But compare "rabid conspiratorialism" with "[you're] wrong in every issue", and then tell me which statements are bashing and sniping. My statement was aimed at something Kennedy says, not his motives, or who he is. You attack my motives (defending Darwinism) and my person (wrong in every issue-- I.e. Ad hominem).
So you need to stop accusiong and lying and perhaps tell me why it was wrong to criticize Kennedy.
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Was Darwin RIGHT to SEE that his atheist views lead away from truth, fact, light and the Bible?

Is Dawkins right when HE TOO shows how this contradiction between the Word of God and atheist darwinism " is CLEARLY SEEN" even by atheists?

Is Patterson right when he claims that faith in atheist darwinism is really a kind of "anti knowledge"??

When darwinist here run away from Romans 1, logic, reason and rational thought - do they SHOW the glaring results of having adopted faith in the system starts with "there is no God" - to the point that they strenuously object TO EVOLUTIONISTS that want to admit to seeing "CLEARLY things IN NATURE that reveal the invisible attributes of a higher intelligence"??

Would you be willing to add the lethal mix of atheist darwinism to the Gospel - to your church leadership, to any Christian expected to hold to rational thought?

Or are all these sources and examples merely "so many more data points to ignore"??
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Naturalistic evolution has clear consequences that Charles Darwin understood perfectly. 1) No gods worth having exist; 2) no life after death exists; 3) no ultimate foundation for ethics exists; 4) no ultimate meaning in life exists; and 5) human free will is nonexistent. ~ William Provine

Evolution is the greatest engine of atheism ever invented. ~ William Provine



Quote:
Should we bash and slander William Provine for being so honest on this point?
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
In My Opinion - Provine is fully exposing the REASON that believers in atheist darwinism are so flagrantly opposed to Romans 1 and Intelligent Design.
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
What I find amazing is that in the "bogus claims by Evols" thread we SEE just how debilitating this disease of atheist darwinism can be - in terms of a pointless vaccuous argument presented in a determined effort to IGNORE all the data in their OWN argument!!

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=835896&postcount=78

In that link we see the believer in atheist darwinism exposed by pointing to his own source and seeing that even IT does not support the specific atheist darwinist charge being made against Bible believing Christians about Patterson.
 
Top