The Constitution: "living" or static?

If past practice is any guide, I suspect that y'all will point out additional/better options I could have included and I'll then put together a better poll. The idea is to get an idea if you guys believe that the Constitution changes with time such that Supreme Court justices are free to decide a case based on more modern understandings or views of the Constitution or its principles or if they should be following a more originalist course. And, of course, if some debate comes out on this question, that would be a good thing, too.

This is aside from the question whether the Supreme Court has the power to declare laws unconstitutional.

 

JB,

To give that side the benefit of the doubt, I'm talking about changes perceived the the Supreme Court, not amendments that have been added to document.

But you raise a good point: is Congress free to legislate based on changes in their own views of the Constitution? Not what they have done, but the proper approach.