Iwrote a friend across the pond and here is his reply to further muddy the waters :BangHead:
NO it is not copyrighted in England , but YES the Authorized Version of the KJV is copyrighted by Queen Elizabeth II of England/Elizabeth I of Scotland thus the title “Authorized Version”. It is actually a UK wide copyright. The USA very early on violated/canceled the copyright and excluded it at some kind of level in the US to make it not copyrighted to the king/queen. I have attached a copy of the license from a British Printed KJV by the TBS… it is the only British/Scottish printed one I have to hand at the moment. I keep giving the things away as fast as I get them. Anyway as you can see the Queen authorized the license in 1957 and this one was printed via that license just a couple of years ago. The title page specifically calls it “Authorized (King James) Version. See especially the last paragraph which forbids any kind of reproduction without written permission—which of course we do all the time for sermon notes ect, ect.
NO it is not copyrighted in England , but YES the Authorized Version of the KJV is copyrighted by Queen Elizabeth II of England/Elizabeth I of Scotland thus the title “Authorized Version”. It is actually a UK wide copyright. The USA very early on violated/canceled the copyright and excluded it at some kind of level in the US to make it not copyrighted to the king/queen. I have attached a copy of the license from a British Printed KJV by the TBS… it is the only British/Scottish printed one I have to hand at the moment. I keep giving the things away as fast as I get them. Anyway as you can see the Queen authorized the license in 1957 and this one was printed via that license just a couple of years ago. The title page specifically calls it “Authorized (King James) Version. See especially the last paragraph which forbids any kind of reproduction without written permission—which of course we do all the time for sermon notes ect, ect.