Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Nothing here that says we would force them (like they forced us to do) - - - but we certainly don't have to buy them exclusive, high-cost plans that insulate them from the costs the rest of is have to pay.
Rob
Not really. But if I didn't buy it I would face a penalty.How were you "forced" to buy insurance?
Not really. But if I didn't buy it I would face a penalty.
Are you "forced" to drive under 65 mph? Are you "forced" to pay property taxes?
The fastest way to solve the health care crisis
...Is to not create one in the first place!
The law says you WILL have to pay a fine. Recognize reality.Why? Are you a foreigner, which the Feds have legal jurisdiction over? Are you a naturalized citizen, which the Feds have legal jurisdiction to withdraw your citizenship? Where in all of the US Fed Const. does the Fed government have legal authority to compel (force) a natural citizen to buy anything or be fined?
I didn't agree to buy insurance.
I did agree to obey traffic laws, and even speed signs are primia facia evidence, and why warnings, no ticket and tickets may or may not be issued. It's discretionary.
I did agree to pay property taxes, when I agreed to buy property, and even that has loop holes, if one uses the law for their benefit, instead of only as a burden.
Per the insurance ~ absolutely they say "you may" have to pay a fine. That is not the law, it is a rendering position of the Feds, because their speech is for anyone to hear, foreign (whom they HAVE exclusive jurisdiction over) and any one who is domestic and desires their provisions.
How were you "forced" to buy insurance?
Public Law 111–148, found constitutional by the US Supreme Court in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. (2012), 183 L. Ed. 2d 450, 132 S.Ct. 2566.Where in all of the US Fed Const. does the Fed government have legal authority to compel (force) a natural citizen to buy anything or be fined?
Public Law 111–148, found constitutional by the US Supreme Court in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. (2012), 183 L. Ed. 2d 450, 132 S.Ct. 2566.
That is Federal LAW - - I know- you stated that the SCUS ruled is constitutional -.... But the "right" to health care still is not in the Constitution
That is Federal LAW - - I know- you stated that the SCUS ruled is constitutional -.... But the "right" to health care still is not in the Constitution
The Supreme Court of the United States says it is.That is Federal LAW - - I know- you stated that the SCUS ruled is constitutional -.... But the "right" to health care still is not in the Constitution
The preamble of the Constitution proves you incorrect on this one. It reads [I added the highlight]:
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
The preamble of the Constitution proves you incorrect on this one. It reads [I added the highlight]:....
The law says you WILL have to pay a fine. Recognize reality.
The Supreme Court allowed the use of A1, S8, Clause 3, to be the enumerated power to find ACA constitutional as long as the fees were considered a tax.According to James Madison, the clause authorized Congress to spend money, but only to carry out the powers and duties specifically enumerated in the subsequent clauses of Article I, Section 8, and elsewhere in the Constitution, not to meet the seemingly infinite needs ofthe general welfare.