Difference? We know Hillary did it BEFORE she got into office.
Oh please. We knew about the Bush emails before he left office. And if it were that big of a deal, charges could have still been brought against folks in his administration after they left office.
It was a bunch of emails and no one was trying to put the country in harm's way so no body cared.
If we know BEFORE, and she gets elected anyway -- then obviously what we found out about Bush after the fact is meaningless.
So why did you bring up someone who you allege did something wrong during a presidency 8 years ago, but you're not fighting tooth-and-nail to prevent the presidency of someone who has been doing the same wrong thing?
I didn't say anybody had done anything wrong. I frankly think it's a waste of taxpayer dollars and has always been nothing more than a witch hunt to try to damage Clintons electability.
I didn't allege anything other than if she's guilty, then go back and charge everyone from the Bush administration too. Otherwise, shut up about the emails.
Seems like everything out of the GOP these days is a bunch of hypocrisy.
The lack of logic for your posts is mind-boggling....
You should be mind boggled as you attempt to make up stuff and then convince yourself that I've said it. You sound kinda crazy.[emoji6]
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk