Thank you, Ed Sutton, to have replied. I am also thankful for what happened on other threads in the mean-time, so that we may here make a fresh start.
This is a big subject, that cannot be properly discussed in a few minutes. You have supplied me a great lot to think over and write back on. Unfortunately I shall need more time. I want to prepare properly by myself, first, before I answer or in order to answer. I am treading onto new territory to myself.
But there is this one point I would from the start get eliminated from discussion, because it is irrelevant to the subject matter and context of the moment.
That is your reference to Galatians 4:9, "I'm just not going to be the beaten slave of any weak, bankrupt beggar, which is exactly what the Mosaic law is (Gal. 4:9), when I'm a "King's kid," an heir of God, and a joint-heir with Jesus Christ. (Rom. 8:17)"
The "beggarly first principles" the Galatian converts "returned" to "again", "worshipping / divining / observating superstitiously", WERE, the four "not-gods" of their "former", idolatrous, heathenish, paganistic "veneration", the four 'first principles' or 'gods' of time of Greek mythology, "days, months, seasons, years". You are greatly mistaken to mistake these pagan gods and their worship, for what you - not the Bible - call, "the Mosaic Law". The Seventh Day Adventists have for more than one and half a century tried to prove just that, and failed. May I refer you to previous threads where BobRyan and EricB and myself inter alia were in conversation on this Scripture. I think one went like this, 'Do you mistake Romans 14 for Galatians 4:9' --- or along those lines. Not very long ago. BobRyan in fact had to position himself against his own denomination on this Scripture! That, I can tell you, takes some guts!
Your relying for your viewpoint on Gl4:9 should not be allowed. The Scriptures in no way correlate the "Law of Sin and Death" with the "not-gods / first principles: days, months, season, years". Please do not let us get side-tracked and completely derailed by associating these concepts; they are mutually exclusive thoughts.