• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The October Surprise

The Biblicist

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
We now have solid proof that the adminstration, state departement and Intelligence PURPOSELY LIED as e-mails have emerged showing they knew it was a terrorist attack from the very beginning during the live time coverage.

The President was not going to allow this opportunity to slip through his hands. The administration purposely lied and then promised an investigation and then set the American People up during the last two debates for his Lone Ranger revenge that will take place just days before the election.

He knew the race would be close and this lone ranger episode at the last moment would give him the surge to win the election.

IF ANYONE HAS ANY WAY TO CONTACT THE ROMNEY CAMP OR FOX NEWS then please pass this post to them. You can bet on it!
 
Zaac

Zaac

Well-Known Member
The Biblicist said:
We now have solid proof that the adminstration, state departement and Intelligence PURPOSELY LIED as e-mails have emerged showing they knew it was a terrorist attack from the very beginning during the live time coverage.

The President was not going to allow this opportunity to slip through his hands. The administration purposely lied and then promised an investigation and then set the American People up during the last two debates for his Lone Ranger revenge that will take place just days before the election.

He knew the race would be close and this lone ranger episode at the last moment would give him the surge to win the election.

IF ANYONE HAS ANY WAY TO CONTACT THE ROMNEY CAMP OR FOX NEWS then please pass this post to them. You can bet on it!
Click to expand...

free-happy-smileys-819.gif
 
The Biblicist

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Biblicist said:
We now have solid proof that the adminstration, state departement and Intelligence PURPOSELY LIED as e-mails have emerged showing they knew it was a terrorist attack from the very beginning during the live time coverage.

The President was not going to allow this opportunity to slip through his hands. The administration purposely lied and then promised an investigation and then set the American People up during the last two debates for his Lone Ranger revenge that will take place just days before the election.

He knew the race would be close and this lone ranger episode at the last moment would give him the surge to win the election.

IF ANYONE HAS ANY WAY TO CONTACT THE ROMNEY CAMP OR FOX NEWS then please pass this post to them. You can bet on it!
Click to expand...

Remember, that in the last two debates Obama has definantly and sternly looked into the camera and told the American people "I will bring those guilty of killing our Ambassador to justifice."

We know those killers are still free and we know some are hiding right out in the open because reporters have approached them.

Therefore, the military has been restrained by Obama from taking action! Why?

Perhaps the reason is TIMING? If just before the election Obama unleashed the military and did a Hollywood type of strike that either eliminated the killers or captured them and brought them to justice, then, Obama could again get center stage, look into the camera and say, "I told you I mean what I say and I have kept my promise, and then go down his list of promises he claims to have kept."

That would give him center stage right before the election. It would confirm his promises right before the election and I believe he thinks it would give him the essential bump right before the election.

We will see shortly!
 
L

LadyEagle

<b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
And I guess the BIG Hollywood production movie (about getting OBL) with additions to add more Obama in it will be released 2 days before the election. That's the scoop.
 
poncho

poncho

Well-Known Member
When Nixon lied, he was impeached.
Click to expand...
When Bush and the neocons lied we went to war and never looked back. Now we are reaping the rewards of that fruit. Pun intended.

Despite the narrative repeated by the Western press, it would appear that the US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia above all others, constitute the greatest purveyors of state-sponsored terrorism. Furthermore, it would appear that the most feared and notorious international terrorist organization, Al Qaeda, and its various affiliates including the Muslim Brotherhood political front, was in fact not only created by the US and Saudi Arabia in the mountains of Afghanistan in the 1980's, but has since then been perpetuated by the US and Saudi Arabia.

Nations accused of coddling Al Qaeda and sponsoring terrorism, including Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Qaddafi's Libya, have in fact fought the hardest against these extremist forces but have been consistently sabotaged by Western efforts portraying targeted militants as "pro-democracy protesters" as was done in Libya when Qaddafi's forces were at the gates of Benghazi. Similarly, this is being done in Syria today as the government of President Bashar al-Assad fights fiercely against these verified, documented terrorist networks, habitually referred to by the Western press as "freedom fighters" and "pro-democracy rebels." source

Now we are putting our "faith" in the same liars (Romney's neocon advisers). What does that say about us? "Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me." Fool me everytime . . . pick your own ending.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
S

saturneptune

New Member
poncho said:
When Bush and the neocons lied we went to war and never looked back. Now we are reaping the rewards of that fruit. Pun intended.

Despite the narrative repeated by the Western press, it would appear that the US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia above all others, constitute the greatest purveyors of state-sponsored terrorism. Furthermore, it would appear that the most feared and notorious international terrorist organization, Al Qaeda, and its various affiliates including the Muslim Brotherhood political front, was in fact not only created by the US and Saudi Arabia in the mountains of Afghanistan in the 1980's, but has since then been perpetuated by the US and Saudi Arabia.

Nations accused of coddling Al Qaeda and sponsoring terrorism, including Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Qaddafi's Libya, have in fact fought the hardest against these extremist forces but have been consistently sabotaged by Western efforts portraying targeted militants as "pro-democracy protesters" as was done in Libya when Qaddafi's forces were at the gates of Benghazi. Similarly, this is being done in Syria today as the government of President Bashar al-Assad fights fiercely against these verified, documented terrorist networks, habitually referred to by the Western press as "freedom fighters" and "pro-democracy rebels." source

Now we are putting our "faith" in the same liars (Romney's neocon advisers). What does that say about us? "Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me." Fool me everytime . . . pick your own ending.
Click to expand...
For all of your vast knowledge, Nixon was never impeached. Nixon lied, but resigned before articles of impeachment were voted on by the House. The House Judiciary Committee recommended the House adopt three articles of impeachment on July 25, 1974. Nixon resigned on August 9, 1974. It also seems odd to me, that since you do not receive up to date intelligence information, that you pattern every conflict today in the Middle East based on one that happened over thirty years ago. Because "freedom fighters' in one civil war are terrorists, does not mean that "freedom fighters" in every civil war are terrorists. If you truly were a believer in the Constitution, you would be against any presence in any Muslim country, unless we had a bilateral treaty with such nation, or a multi lateral treaty with a limited number of states.

For all of your networking between business, corportations, military organizations, and financial bankers, I have never once heard you talk about how eliminating the UN would put us more in line with the Constitution.

It also seems quite unusual that on one hand, you harp on the candidates for the Presidency, how they both are equally destructive to the middle class and average American. Then, on the other hand, you talk about how the President is really controlled by the powers behind your ghost government conspiracies. So which is it?
 
poncho

poncho

Well-Known Member
saturneptune said:
For all of your vast knowledge, Nixon was never impeached. Nixon lied, but resigned before articles of impeachment were voted on by the House. The House Judiciary Committee recommended the House adopt three articles of impeachment on July 25, 1974. Nixon resigned on August 9, 1974. It also seems odd to me, that since you do not receive up to date intelligence information, that you pattern every conflict today in the Middle East based on one that happened over thirty years ago. Because "freedom fighters' in one civil war are terrorists, does not mean that "freedom fighters" in every civil war are terrorists. If you truly were a believer in the Constitution, you would be against any presence in any Muslim country, unless we had a bilateral treaty with such nation, or a multi lateral treaty with a limited number of states.

For all of your networking between business, corportations, military organizations, and financial bankers, I have never once heard you talk about how eliminating the UN would put us more in line with the Constitution.

It also seems quite unusual that on one hand, you harp on the candidates for the Presidency, how they both are equally destructive to the middle class and average American. Then, on the other hand, you talk about how the President is really controlled by the powers behind your ghost government conspiracies. So which is it?
Click to expand...

FYI it was Lady Eagle who said Nixon was impeached. Maybe you should be aiming your sarcasm you said you would try to "cut down on" on her instead. :smilewinkgrin:

There was a time here that I harped endlessly about getting us out of the UN. You must have missed it. Go search the archives I'm sure you'll stumble across one of my many posts on the subject. Hint. Look for them in "Bush" era.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
poncho

poncho

Well-Known Member
saturneptune said:
So first, why dont you source your quotes, and second, why did you leave out the main subject of the post? When one quotes with no credit, it is his own quote.
Click to expand...

I was trying to protect a friend. I would have done the same for you . . . friend. Sorry LE. My mistake.

Okay SN go ahead and tell me how you and everyone else here are entitled to making mistakes but I am not. And while you are at it tell me why I am the only one here that has to back up every one of my statements while some of you here are exempt from the same "rule".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
S

saturneptune

New Member
poncho said:
I was trying to protect a friend. I would have done the same for you . . . friend. Sorry LE. My mistake.

Okay SN go ahead and tell me how you and everyone else here are entitled to making mistakes but I am not. And while you are at it tell me why I am the only one here that has to back up every one of my statements while some of you here are exempt from the same "rule".
Click to expand...
You hurled the first volley about the Nixon quote. If you had been interested in a serious discussion, that would have been ignored, and you would have immediately gone to the issue of "freedom fighters" being terrorists.
 
poncho

poncho

Well-Known Member
saturneptune said:
You hurled the first volley about the Nixon quote. If you had been interested in a serious discussion, that would have been ignored, and you would have immediately gone to the issue of "freedom fighters" being terrorists.
Click to expand...

Did I not admit to making a mistake already? How many times do you want me to apologize? Would one hundred be enough or would two hundred be better for you? And I'm still waiting for you to explain the issue of the double standard here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
S

saturneptune

New Member
poncho said:
Did I not admit to making a mistake already? How many times do you want me to apologize? Would one hundred be enough or would two hundred be better for you? And I'm still waiting for you to explain the issue of the double standard here.
Click to expand...
Two hundred is not necessary. Seven times seventy will do. There is no double standard, as there are no international bankers hiding under your bed waiting to steal all the gold and silver you accumulated today.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top