The truth is called islamophobic

Just more evidence of people being Christianophobic.

 

Virgil Goode for president 2008.

 

Yeah, right after they apologize. It will take several years just to compile the list of Islamoatrocities.

 

Some people are keeping lists:

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html#Attacks

Just the attacks this month, December 2006, takes awhile to read.

 

Unfortunately, no proposed immigration law would have impacted the election of a native-born American such as Ellison, nor his choice of the Quran.

So let's pick some of the very valid reasons for immigration reform to support.

 

"Goode spokesman Linwood Duncan said that no apology was forthcoming. "The only statement the congressman has is that he stands by the letter," Duncan said.":applause:

 

Mr Goode has got to be better than those in the news media who are running or thinking of running.

 

Wanting to place restrictions on the basis of religion is bigoted and, in this particular instance, Islamphobic.

 

Well, "Islamophobic" just sounds so....PC....next thing the MSM will be saying is that being Islam is genetic.

PC not run amok enough for you? Times intro biography caption:

<link edited (posted link has links to objectionable sites) LE>

Must be the inverse of "Islamophobia". God help us all.

 

He sure would get my vote.

 

My apologies. I thought it related to the OP link.

 

Do the numbrs verify that immigrants of Islamic faith, and/or from predominantly Islamic countries, have a greater probability of committing violent/terroristic actions? If yes, restricting such immigration is logical.

If the circumstance of restricting immigration by religion is unacceptable, consider that such categorizing and probabilities are used in determining insurance risks, "affirmative action," and the awarding of civil damages... males must pay more for the same life insurance benefits because we have shorter longevities (more likely to croak younger), but women do not pay more for the same health and disability benefits even though statistics show they miss more days of work by illness or family situations; white males can be legally discriminated against because of of institutionalized policies of generations past; and in a claims adjuster class I was once in we learned that a jury is likely to award a woman who has had her face disfigured in an accident at least 3 1/2 times as much as man comparably injured. With all this legal junk, why is it supposed to be "wrong" to restrict immigration on the basis of a religion in which followers thereof have a greater probability of committing terrorist acts?

 

Would that apply equally to Irish Catholics and Protestants? Or Basque Catholics?

 

Are they committing the majority of terrorism attacks in the world? If they are, then it should be applied equally.

Fact: Not all Muslims are terrorists but the majority of terrorist attacks committed on this planet are committed by muslims.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com