• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Young Man of Mark 14:51

PreachTony

Active Member
Mark 14:46 said:
46 And they laid their hands on him, and took him.

49 I was daily with you in the temple teaching, and ye took me not: but the scriptures must be fulfilled.
50 And they all forsook him, and fled.
51 And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:
52 And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.
53 And they led Jesus away to the high priest: and with him were assembled all the chief priests and the elders and the scribes.

Mark's Gospel records the events of the Garden and the arrest of Jesus slightly differently than the other gospel writers. He includes an episode that no other writer considers.

Starting in verse 51, after the disciples had fled from Jesus, we see a "certain young man" following after the arresting party and the Lord. He is described as wearing a "linen cloth" over his naked body. The soldiers try to apprehend the young man, but he basically spins free, out of the garment, and runs off naked.

Personally, for as many times as I've read through the gospel accounts of the arrest, I had never really deeply paid attention to this scripture until last night.

I've found commentaries that say the young man might have been the rich young man who Jesus instructed to sell all his goods. Others say that it was Lazarus, who Jesus raised from the dead, but Lazarus is never really described as a "young man." Then again, the priests had taken steps to capture and kill Lazarus, as well (John 12:10). Other commentaries say it was actually Mark himself.

I'm curious what you guys think. (Please keep it civil... :smilewinkgrin:)
 

Scarlett O.

Moderator
Moderator
Here's what David Guzik says....

e. Now a certain young man followed Him . . . and he left the linen cloth and fled from them naked: Jesus was forsaken even by a young follower, who in the confusion fled naked. Since the earliest days of the church, commentators have supposed this young man to be Mark himself. It was his humble way of saying, "I was there."

i. Many people suppose that the upper room where Jesus held the last supper just a few hours earlier was at a home owned by Mark's family. Acts 12:12 says that the disciples used to meet at the home of Mark's mother. It may be that the arresting army led by Judas first came to Mark's home, because that is where Judas last left Jesus. When Judas and the group came and found them gone, it would have been easy for Judas to suppose that they went to Gethsemane, because Jesus was accustomed to going there (Luke 22:39). When Judas and the group started out for Gethsemane, we can imagine that young Mark hurriedly dressed in a simple linen cloth and set out to beat Judas and his gang to Gethsemane so that he could warn Jesus.

ii. "It is usually supposed that Mark himself, son of Mary (Acts 12:12) in whose house they probably had observed the Passover meal, had followed Jesus and the apostles to the Garden." (Robertson)

iii. "The modest spirit of Mark seemed to say, 'Friend Peter, while the Holy Ghost moves me to, tell thy fault, and let it stand on record, he also constrains me to write my own as a sort of preface to it, for I, too, in my mad, hare-brained folly, would have run, unclothed as I was, upon the guard to rescue my Lord and Master; yet, at the first sight, of the rough legionaries, at the first gleam of their swords, away I fled, timid, faint-hearted, and afraid that I should be too roughly handled.'" (Spurgeon)
 

PreachTony

Active Member
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers states this:
And there followed him a certain young man.—The remarkable incident that follows is narrated by St. Mark only. It had clearly made a deep impression on the minds of some of the disciples (probably enough, on that of Peter), from whom, directly or indirectly, the report came. Who it was that appeared in this strange fashion we are left to conjecture.

Some have supposed that it was St. Mark himself, but for this there is obviously no ground but the fact that this Evangelist alone records it. A careful examination of the facts suggests another conclusion as probable. (1) The man was “young,” and the self-same term is applied to the ruler who had great possessions (Matthew 19:20). (2) He had apparently been sleeping, or, it may be, watching, not far from Gethsemane, with the linen sheet wrapped round him, and had been roused by the approach of the officers and the crowd.

This suggests one who lived somewhere on the Mount of Olives, and so far points to Lazarus or Simon of Bethany, as the only two conspicuous disciples in that neighbourhood. (3) He was one who so loved our Lord that he went on following Him when all the disciples forsook Him and fled, and this also was what might be expected from Lazarus. On the supposition suggested in (1), he was now obeying almost literally the command, “Take up thy cross, and follow Me.” (See Notes on Matthew 19:16-22.) (4) He was one whom the officers (the words “the young men” are omitted in the better MSS.) were eager to seize, when they allowed all the disciples to go their way, and this agrees with the command which had been given by the priests, that they should take and kill Lazarus also (John 12:10). (5) As the “linen sheet” or sindôn (see Note on Matthew 27:59) was especially used for the burial of the dead, it is conceivable, on this supposition, that what had been the winding-sheet of the dead Lazarus had been kept and used by him in memory of his resurrection. (6) On the hypothesis thus suggested, the suppression of the name stands on the same footing as that of the name of the sister of Lazarus, who poured the precious ointment on our Lord’s head at Bethany (Matthew 26:7, Mark 14:3), whom the Evangelists must have known, but whom they mention simply as a “woman.” Their lips were sealed as to the family of Bethany until the circumstances, whatever they may have been, that called for silence had passed away.

It is obvious that so far as this identity is established it suggests many thoughts of profound interest. What had seemed impossible to men had proved possible with God. He who had gone away sorrowful because he had great possessions, had given freely to the poor (see Notes on Matthew 26:6; Matthew 26:9), and had proved more faithful than the Twelve, and so the last had become the first.
 

Zenas

Active Member
I believe it was Mark. Seemingly this event made a bigger impression on Mark than it did the other gospel writers because he is the only one who reported it. At the same time it would have been embarrassing to him, so he gave no name to the young man.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The use of the phrase "a certain ..." indicates the author views this character to play an important part of the narrative. Linen, rather than wool indicates the young man came from a wealthy family, so John Mark's family might have had linen wraps. The account draws attention to the fact that everyone departed Jesus, I believe too that the youth was John Mark, but that is presumption.
 

Reformed

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It could be Mark. Mark could have written in such a way as to not identify himself by name. John used a similar technique when he identified himself "as the disciple whom Jesus loved".
 
Top