I think the lists are good advice. As Brother Tom said, at our church, it one pulpit member disagrees with recommending a person to be pastor, that application is thrown out. One mistake that I think is made from time to time at other churches where I have seen the process is comparing new candidates with the pastor that is leaving, either good or bad. If the departing pastor is loved and has been very successful, it is wrong to expect a new pastor to be a clone. On the other hand, it the departing pastor is one that was not so well liked, then it is a mistake to dismiss all candidates that have any similarities to the departing pastor.
Sometimes there is just a plain mismatch, not the fault of anyone. The pastoral candidate might be fully qualified, and the congregation might serve the Lord as a NT church should, but the personalities clash. It does not have to be a doctronal issue, but maybe just mannerisms. I think a pastor and congregation must like each other.
Sometimes it is a doctrinal issue, as we have had threads for example, about a Calvinist pastor being called to a congregation where the majority believes more in free will. Or maybe a pastor believes in closed communion, but the church does not. There are many such examples, but they need to be worked out before a pastoral-congregation relationship is established.