• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Trump cancels WaPo & NY Times subscriptions for all gov. agencies

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
President Trump Cancels WaPo and NY Times Subscriptions Across ALL Federal Agencies -- Saves Taxpayers Thousands and Prevents Spread of Fake News!

First cnn lost all airport contracts......no more cnn forced on the masses. Why do government offices need these subscriptions anyway? For coffee breaks? Let them bring their own paper.
Agreed. That would actually make good sense. Why should the administration finance what passes for "news" that is so overtly biased and antagonistic to it? Anyone wanting the information could buy it on his own dime. Since these publications are so subversive, they would no doubt be glad to disseminate their propaganda free for the asking. Besides, many other sources report what these two say.
 

Wingman68

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Excellent!
All dissenting opinions should be quashed.
Why should there be ANY opinions offered for consumption in the workplace, especially in a government workplace that is being paid for with taxpayer dollars? Teachers get publications too, with tax dollars. Rolling Stone mag was purchased & there for students to consume. Brilliant use of funds, heh?!
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Excellent!
All dissenting opinions should be quashed.

If the people in the White House want to read all the lies being published, they can buy their own copies.

Nobody's opinion was quashed. At all. Not even one.
 

Squire Robertsson

Administrator
Administrator
While a lot of the papers were bought for the enjoyment of government employees, some were bought for the agency's\office's "clipping service."
 

MRoss

New Member
Yeah, that was weak.

I didn't want to say "Lugenpresse" or "Enemy of the People" because those are instant Godwins.
I thought about trying "who's the snowflake?" or "The Washington Post and The New York Times were totally unequipped to handle the genius of our great President" ala' Stephanie Grisham, but found them equally unsatisfying.
 

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
Excellent! All dissenting opinions should be quashed.
If it were merely opinion presented as opinion, the problem would not be so extreme. The real problem lies in the overwhelming amount of faux news and heavily biased articles being presented as forthright journalism.

Let the hateful propagandists, protected as free press, provide their fare for free—no doubt their domestic and foreign interests would be more than happy to further subsidize their subversive papers.
 
Top