WRONG
Does a city with the toughest gun laws end up with worst gun violence
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...iolence/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6f89f166dc75
The city got its reputation for having the toughest laws in the country because of
two laws that are no longer on the books. The city
used to have a gun registry, but that ended in 2013 when the city council voted to adopt the state’s concealed-carry laws. And in 2010, a federal appeals court
struck down Chicago’s decades-old handgun ban. The decision followed a 2008 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in
District of Columbia v. Heller that asserted the District of Columbia’s ban on handguns violated the Second Amendment, setting a legal precedent for the country.
Chicago is home to roughly 2.7 million people, while St. Louis’s population hovers around 315,000. When the numbers are
analyzed on a per-capita basis, Chicago does not top the list. In 2016, St. Louis had the highest rate of non-fatal shootings with 660 per 100,000 people. Chicago, in contrast, had just 89 per 100,000 people. New Orleans had the highest rate of homicides in 2016, with 47 per 100,000 people. Chicago, in contrast had 16 per 100,000.
Even if Chicago or Illinois had the toughest gun laws in the country, it borders two states, Wisconsin and Indiana that have lax gun laws. A
2015 study from the University of Chicago demonstrated how permeable borders contribute to gun violence in Chicago. Researchers traced all new guns recovered from crimes between 2009 and 2013, and they found that
60 percent of the new guns used in gang-related crimes in the city, and nearly 32 percent of the new guns used in non-gang-related crimes, were purchased in other states.