Trump, the KKK and the DNC and BLM ....

[righteousdude2]

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/28/politics/donald-trump-white-supremacists/

Okay, before you liberals jump me, let me say that I thoroughly believe the KKK is utterly despicable, and the worst mankind has to offer society.

With that said, if Hillary can embrace a group or movement that shouts hateful speech and rhetoric about cops, what did Trump really do wrong? It is clear that he has a lifetime dislike for white supremest groups, and does not embrace such people. Unlike like the DNC which has accepted the support of the BLM even while they shout, "pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon" or "what do we want? Dead cops!" A group that is disrupting public gatherings and illegally marching on public streets (without permits) holding up traffic, and creating mob like scenes in malls and stores?

Sure the BLM is not the KKK, but their hateful rhetoric towards those in law enforcement is just a block or two from going the distance and becoming just as hateful. After all, how many cop killings have been incited by the BLM' movement?

The DNC and Hillary is no better or worse than Trump's hesitation with Jake Tapper's probing set up question to Trump about Duke and his followers. At least that is how I see this issue playing out.

What say you ... is the BLM a lite version of the once powerful.KKK?

 

[kyredneck]

what did Trump really do wrong?

Nothing. David Duke has refused to endorse Trump because he is too close to the Jews:

"Duke, who previously served in the Louisiana statehouse and ran for U.S. Senate in that state, did not endorse Trump and said Trump remains untrustworthy for his "deep Jewish connections" and support for Israel.

Trump, whose daughter Ivanka converted to Judaism and is religiously observant, has been very vocal about his support for Israel and has slammed President Barack Obama's administration for strained relations with the Israeli government....."

The bottom line is that 'the establishment' is literally in a desperate state of panic to do anything to stop Trump. They're trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill here.

 

[righteousdude2]

Nothing. David Duke has refused to endorse Trump because he is too close to the Jews:

"Duke, who previously served in the Louisiana statehouse and ran for U.S. Senate in that state, did not endorse Trump and said Trump remains untrustworthy for his "deep Jewish connections" and support for Israel.

Trump, whose daughter Ivanka converted to Judaism and is religiously observant, has been very vocal about his support for Israel and has slammed President Barack Obama's administration for strained relations with the Israeli government....."

The bottom line is that 'the establishment' is literally in a desperate state of panic to do anything to stop Trump. They're trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill here.

Brother .... the established GOP lifer's are running for their political life! They are pulling out the stops and breaking their budgets to do whatever is necessary to drop this guy before the convention. I think the convention may be hostile, and I am leaning towards Trump going third party and starting a new and improved version of the GOP! But that is my opinion! I just don't see the Republican's honoring that contract, and getting behind Trump!

I think Donald should start a new and revised version of the "Whigs!" But spell it the "Wigs!" WhistlingWhistling

 

[Rolfe]

I am still waiting to hear Trump explain how he plans to make Mexico pay for the Wall...

 

[kyredneck]

This is the desired effect from the mountain they're making from the mole hill:

"....Trump has been regularly heckled by protesters at his campaign rallies, but tensions have increased after he came under fire on Sunday for not immediately condemning support from a prominent white supremacist.

Earlier Monday, some black students at another Trump campaign rally, on the campus of Radford University in Virginia, were led out by Secret Service after they began chanting: “No more hate! No more hate! Let's be equal, let's be great!"...."
Black students ejected from Trump rally in Ga.

 

[Zaac]

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/28/politics/donald-trump-white-supremacists/

Okay, before you liberals jump me, let me say that I thoroughly believe the KKK is utterly despicable, and the worst mankind has to offer society.

With that said, if Hillary can embrace a group or movement that shouts hateful speech and rhetoric about cops, what did Trump really do wrong? It is clear that he has a lifetime dislike for white supremest groups, and does not embrace such people. Unlike like the DNC which has accepted the support of the BLM even while they shout, "pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon" or "what do we want? Dead cops!" A group that is disrupting public gatherings and illegally marching on public streets (without permits) holding up traffic, and creating mob like scenes in malls and stores?

Sure the BLM is not the KKK, but their hateful rhetoric towards those in law enforcement is just a block or two from going the distance and becoming just as hateful. After all, how many cop killings have been incited by the BLM' movement?

The DNC and Hillary is no better or worse than Trump's hesitation with Jake Tapper's probing set up question to Trump about Duke and his followers. At least that is how I see this issue playing out.

What say you ... is the BLM a lite version of the once powerful.KKK?

Next.

 

[Crabtownboy]

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/28/politics/donald-trump-white-supremacists/

Okay, before you liberals jump me, let me say that I thoroughly believe the KKK is utterly despicable, and the worst mankind has to offer society.

With that said,

"With that said," is an erase that negates all written before the phrase.

What say you ... is the BLM a lite version of the once powerful.KKK?

Nowhere near the KKK. How many people have the BLM lynched?

 

[righteousdude2]

Next.

I say the Black Lives Matter thugs are as bad as the new and improved KKK. I'd love to hear your opinion zaac. I know you have at least one opinion, so let it rip!

 

[InTheLight]

 

[righteousdude2]

"With that said," is an erase that negates all written before the phrase.




Nowhere near the KKK. How many people have the BLM lynched?

The number of cops killed by the whipped into a frenzied lather by the BLM angry rhetoric is responsible for more that a few deaths this past year. The KKK, haven't lynched anyone in a long time. Have they?

 

[Revmitchell]

Nowhere near the KKK. How many people have the BLM lynched?

In the same time frame that the BLM has actually existed how many has the KKK actually lynched. the BLM would lynch as many as they could, as would the KKK, if they thought they could get away with it.,,

 

[Crabtownboy]

In the same time frame that the BLM has actually existed how many has the KKK actually lynched. the BLM would lynch as many as they could, as would the KKK, if they thought they could get away with it.,,

Proof please...

History shows what the KKK would do if they had a chance.

 

[Squire Robertsson]

The point is the KKK hasn't lynched any one in the bolded time frame. That is not denying the KKK hasn't lynched anyone. And Rev agreed with you about what the Klan would do if they could.

In the same time frame that the BLM has actually existed how many has the KKK actually lynched. the BLM would lynch as many as they could, as would the KKK, if they thought they could get away with it.,,

Proof please or we can say you are defending the KKK.

History shows what the KKK would do if they had a chance.

 

[Crabtownboy]

The point is the KKK hasn't lynched any one in the bolded time frame. That is not denying the KKK hasn't lynched anyone. And Rev agreed with you about what the Klan would do if they could.

Squire, that's not accurate. The BLM was established in 1946. There have been lynching since then.


The numbers below, by year, are from: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/lynchingyear.html

The site cited begins in 1882.

Lynchings: By Year and Race
Year Whites Blacks Total

The first number under each year is whites lynched.
The second number under each year is blacks lynched
The third number is the total number of people lynched.

1946
0
6
6
1947
0
1
1
1948
1
1
2
1949
0
3
3
1950
1
1
2
1951
0
1
1
1952
0
0
0
1953
0
0
0
1954
0
0
0
1955
0
3
3
1956
0
0
0
1957
1
0
1
1958
0
0
0
1959
0
1
1
1960
0
0
0
1961
0
1
1
1962
0
0
0
1963
0
1
1
1964
2
1
3



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-lynching-black-men-alive.html#ixzz41g90ScA4
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook[/QUOTE]

 

[carpro]

Nothing. David Duke has refused to endorse Trump because he is too close to the Jews:

"Duke, who previously served in the Louisiana statehouse and ran for U.S. Senate in that state, did not endorse Trump and said Trump remains untrustworthy for his "deep Jewish connections" and support for Israel.

Stop it. Nobody cares about the truth.

 

[Revmitchell]

The BLM was not, in fact, started in 1946.

The Creation of a Movement
I created #BlackLivesMatter with Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi, two of my sisters, as a call to action for Black people after 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was post-humously placed on trial for his own murder and the killer, George Zimmerman, was not held accountable for the crime he committed. It was a response to the anti-Black racism that permeates our society and also, unfortunately, our movements.

http://blacklivesmatter.com/herstory/

 

[Zaac]

I say the Black Lives Matter thugs are as bad as the new and improved KKK. I'd love to hear your opinion zaac. I know you have at least one opinion, so let it rip!

My opinion is that you have racists tendencies towards all things black and that you would get rid of black jelly beans if you could.

You're poured from the same mold as the white race pimps, Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly who also tried to make a comparison between BLM and the KKK.

...Primarily, there is no evidence of a connection between the Black Lives Matter movement and a supposed “spree” of attacks on America’s police. The suggestion that there is is nothing more than confirmation bias filtered through the White Gaze and the White Racial Frame — aided in large part by a media apparatus{FOX NEWS} more than willing to connect the dots. Contrary to the popular myth, police work is also not one of the most dangerous jobs in the United States — and, in fact, police deaths on the job are near their lowest levels in decades.

In reality, pandering such as O’Reilly’s is part of the American Right’s long, desperate search for “black racism.” White supremacists desperately engage in this quest. “Respectable” conservative elites and the “mainstream” right-wing media also participate in the hunt too. Black conservatives ride at the head of the pack as trackers and scouts. O’Reilly and other conservatives are obsessed with finding “black racism” because, in the right-wing political imagination, to find examples of “black racism” would erase centuries of white supremacy and white privilege in the United States...

http://www.salon.com/2015/10/16/bil...es_his_slanderous_black_lives_matter_crusade/

 

[Crabtownboy]

The BLM was not, in fact, started in 1946.



http://blacklivesmatter.com/herstory/

As usual you are so wrong.

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bureau_of_Land_Management

President Harry S. Truman created the BLM in 1946 by combining two existing agencies: the General Land Office and the Grazing Service.

 

[Squire Robertsson]

In this case, CTB, who said BLM in this thread stood for the Federal agency. You're the only one making that conection. The rest of us understood the context and took BLM to stand for Black Lives Matter. Instead of asking for clarification, you assumed a fact not in evidence.

 

[Revmitchell]

As usual you are so wrong.

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bureau_of_Land_Management

President Harry S. Truman created the BLM in 1946 by combining two existing agencies: the General Land Office and the Grazing Service.

What? What in the world does the Bureau of land Management have to do with the op or anything in this thread?

When I gave you proof that the BLM (Black Lives Matters) movement began recently and not in 1946 you rated it as dumb. Then you proceed to show the Bureau of Land Management was started in 1946 completely ignoring my post that even made clear exactly what I and , in fact everyone else, is talking about.

If there is a post most in need of a dumb rating in all of history....................it is yours. I am sitting here actually laughing at your incredibly unnecessary and ridiculous post.

Crabby, this, I believe, is clear evidence you post out of emotion and do very little actual reading of the content in which you respond too. I suggest you slow down and think through these things in a rational manner in the future.