• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

United Airlines Mandate

Andre

Well-Known Member
What, specifically, do you object to relative to this policy?

Do you not believe that employers have the right and the responsibility to ensure a safe workplace?

Many posters object to how all the vaccine rules and other restrictions impinge on freedom. Well, yes they do restrict freedom. And this is indeed unfortunate. However, freedom, while a value worth promoting, is not the only value to which reasonable people ascribe - we also care about promoting human physical well-being, i.e., preventing needless suffering and death.

I politely suggest that those opposed to the various restrictions that have descended upon us during this difficult time are engaging in subtle, and likely unconscious, distortion - they are taking what is really a complex, multi-dimensional issue and focusing solely on one aspect - freedom.

I am all for freedom, but I also want to be alive and healthy enough to enjoy it.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
I see it the same as smoking.
A person who smokes will pay higher insurance rates,
and rightly so.
Is that policy discrimination - YES, IT IS?
(this is what I call good discrimination)
(remember - discrimination is a neutral term)

But why should I have to pay for someone who practices an unhealthy lifestyle.

and likewise does a person have a right to work in a safe environment.
If you dont want the shot -then you pay extra. The only possible exception
would be someone who has a verified medical reason.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I could understand requiring a vaccination to fly (given current science points to the effectiveness of the vaccines).

But I do not understand charging more.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What, specifically, do you object to relative to this policy?

Do you not believe that employers have the right and the responsibility to ensure a safe workplace?

Many posters object to how all the vaccine rules and other restrictions impinge on freedom. Well, yes they do restrict freedom. And this is indeed unfortunate. However, freedom, while a value worth promoting, is not the only value to which reasonable people ascribe - we also care about promoting human physical well-being, i.e., preventing needless suffering and death.

I politely suggest that those opposed to the various restrictions that have descended upon us during this difficult time are engaging in subtle, and likely unconscious, distortion - they are taking what is really a complex, multi-dimensional issue and focusing solely on one aspect - freedom.

I am all for freedom, but I also want to be alive and healthy enough to enjoy it.
A private business can not discriminate based on other medical issues.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
A private business can not discriminate based on other medical issues.
Actually, they can. Obese travelers can be charged for two seats. People who are visibly sick can be denied travel if an infectious disease is suspected.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Actually, they can. Obese travelers can be charged for two seats. People who are visibly sick can be denied travel if an infectious disease is suspected.
Try denying someone service because they are HIV or Hep C infected.
Not vaccinated is not taking up two seats. Not vaccinated is not evidence of infection. The vaxed spread Covid at just as high rate. If the bar has now been lowered so far that all the vax is supposed to do is protect you from serious illness, then the vax status of anyone other than yourself is meaningless.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Try denying someone service because they are HIV or Hep C infected.
HIV and Hep C are Bloodborne Pathogens. They are not transmitted through casual contact.

A more realistic example would be "try banning someone a flight because they have Chickenpox or the measles". And they do.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
HIV and Hep C are Bloodborne Pathogens. They are not transmitted through casual contact.

A more realistic example would be "try banning someone a flight because they have Chickenpox or the measles". And they do.
Try banning someone from the flight because they are not chicken pox vaccinated.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
HIV and Hep C are Bloodborne Pathogens. They are not transmitted through casual contact.

A more realistic example would be "try banning someone a flight because they have Chickenpox or the measles". And they do.
The vax does not insure a person is not spreading Covid.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
The vax does not insure a person is not spreading Covid.
I agree. The article @Revmitchell posted demonstrated that vaccinated people are most likely to be asymptomatic while covid positive. It just makes the virus less dangerous to the vaccinated (and minimizes the production of varients).
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I was addressing your comment that they cannot ban service for any other medical condition. You were mistaking.
I was addressing your comment that they cannot ban service for any other medical condition. You were mistaking.
No. I was not mistaken. Just not clear enough. Not being vaccinated is not a communicable disease. It is a condition of ones medical history. It poses no threat to others. If the vaccines actually prevented Covid transmission the point could be argued.
 
Top