The claim is that 1 in 6 children have "food insecurity."
The programs ideals:
1) Children are better able to learn when they are not hungry
2) The program would eliminate the stigma of poverty among those receiving food from the state
3) It would reduce the grocery costs for families of children
Fact:
One in five children in the U.S. have an obesity problem.
Hispanic and black children, and in particular, children in families with lower incomes are overly represented in the obese population.
My opinion:
This will take time, money, and attention away from the core components of the school curriculum.
Some time after implementation the program needs to be evaluated: Did the program significantly assist students to perform their educational skills better?
Yes, there would be a few whom the program would help.
But my guess is it would NOT be significantly beneficial to school programs in general.
Rob