• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Want to be called "Dr." with a Doctor of Ministry Degree?

Havensdad

New Member
To whom it may concern:

There is a blog out there in the "blog-o-sphere." They are discussing whether/if one with the DMin degree should be called "Dr." or not?

Here is the web blog page:

http://kerussocharis.blogspot.com/2010/05/pastor-with-d-min-degree-should-not-be.html

What think ye? Let me hear from you!! :laugh:

"That is all!"

I disagree strongly. If his point were simply "Pastors should be humble, and should not seek to be called 'Dr.'" I would agree with him. However, Considering the number of hours it takes to get a D.Min....more than many secular Ph.D.'s (since you are required to have a 90 hour M.Div. before you can even start it...compared to the much smaller MA in many secular fields), the work load is certainly there.

The J.D. is not comparable. It requires no Thesis, Project, or dissertation, unlike most D.Min.'s which do. The Pastorate is by definition an academic field; whether one is teaching in the Pulpit, or teaching in the classroom, seems to be a moot point; they are teaching.

Now, as to Pastors pushing to be called "Dr."...no I do not think that is right. Of course, I think it is equally wrong when a Christian Seminary Professor insists on it.
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I have an earned PhD and ask people not to call me "doctor."

I can't do a thing medically for them. Too many of these guys who go get DMins, or worse honorary DMins from unaccredited institutions, just want to have Dr. before their name.

One of the comments mentioned something that has stuck out to me. In recent years many DMin programme have become a lackluster, non-rigorous, clergy advancement degree. They lack any amount of truly indepth reading on important issues and the final projects are as useful as a butcher at a vegetarian convention.

It is no small truth that one of the ironies of fundamentalism (which has carried over to evangelicalism these days) is how anti-intellectual so many of their leaders would be, yet they would require others to call them "Dr" and go out to get as many honorary doctorates as possible.

I like that the latest SBC Pastor's Convention will not be listing anyone as "Dr So and So." That's a big step in the right direction. :)
 

jaigner

Active Member
I don't think there is anything wrong with a pastor who has an earned doctorate to call themselves "Dr." It's up to them and it doesn't have to be prideful.
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If I had a Ph.D. I would want people to call my by my first name .... just like they do now.

No matter how much education we have anyone we meet, regardless of whether they have a lot of education or very little, can be our teacher in one way or another.
 

swaimj

<img src=/swaimj.gif>
If I had a Ph.D. I would want people to call my by my first name .... just like they do now.
Interesting. In my work in car sales, I interract with people in many fields who have doctorates including, recently, a dean of education at a nearby college, a chemist professor at Temply U as well as medical doctors, dentists, lawyers, and a lady who had a doctorate in psychology. None of these people introduced themself to me by the title "Dr." and when I found out in conversation that they have doctorates that corrected me and said "don't call me doctor, just call me by my first name".

The exception to this seems to be RCC priests who typically introduce themselves as "Father" and let you know that they expect you to call them "Father'. And in my academic career in fundamentalist institutions I have found an insistence in using titles among older men, but less so in younger men. Perhaps that's because I am now older than some of the guys in seminary who now have doctorates, or perhaps the culture is changing somewhat.

In summary, secular people tend to use their title when they are functioning in the realm of their expertise among students, but otherwise they are quite informal. I would think Baptists should operate more informally and not insist on titles since, as ministers of Christ, we are not to "lord it over the flock".
 

TomVols

New Member
Overall, this is not a good blog post.

The author is not correct about D.Pharms. Many of them are called Dr.

The JD is more equivalent to the M.Div as the first professional degree for entry. You have to have a JD to get an LLM for instance. You have to have the M.Div to get the D.Min. So it's not an equal comparison. And attorneys have a preferred, standard "Counselor" instead of Doctor.

While I agree that D.Min programs are getting weaker by the day and those projects are just silly at times, I have no problem with someone getting the D.Min and being called Doctor. I have a problem when anyone insists on "Dr" or "Rev" or what not.

One final word: it is a recent deal to call medical doctors as doctors. The title of "doctor" was reserved for the clergy/academy. I believe Lloyd-Jones even refused the title, preferring the standard "Mr" if memory serves me.
 

swaimj

<img src=/swaimj.gif>
My point is that secular people with degrees use the proper titles when they are in a professional situation, but when they are not in that context they do not demand the use of titles. Whether the degree they hold is equivalent to a masters or a doctorate is really not relevant to the argument I made.

My other point is that leaders in Christianity have a tendency to be more concerned that they be addressed by their title than people in the secular fields do and I think it is wrong for Christian leaders to put so much emphasis on titles. Fortunately, I think this tendency is changing for less emphasis on titles and I think that is good.
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
it is a recent deal to call medical doctors as doctors. The title of "doctor" was reserved for the clergy/academy.

Shakespeare, The Merry Wives of Windsor:
I think you know him; Master Doctor Caius, the renowned French physician.
Keep them asunder: here comes Doctor Caius.
Shall I lose my doctor? no; he gives me the potions and the motions. Shall I lose my parson, my priest, my Sir Hugh? no; he gives me the proverbs and the no-verbs.
 

TomVols

New Member
This was pointed out by none other than Martyn Lloyd Jones, Jerome (among others)

Take it up with him. :laugh:
 

StefanM

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't "get" the mystique that the M.D. has. Sure, physicians play a very important role, and they are usually quite well-off financially. Beyond that, why does the M.D. degree grant the right to be called "doctor" when it doesn't require a thesis or dissertation? It teaches the practice of medicine. That's it. It's a highly rigorous degree, to be sure, but I don't see why it should be considered better than a PhD.

IMO, any degree with the term "doctor" in the name allows for the usage of the title.

(I know that law degrees are a bit different, but there are ethical reasons involved in that discussion. It's another thread entirely!)

This includes many doctorates: PhD, EdD, DMin, JSD, DDS, DO, MD, PharmD, STD, ThD, DArch, etc.
 

gb93433

Active Member
Site Supporter
When I was in seminary I was told to get the degrees and then throw them away once in the pastorate.

I teach at a major university where one of the professors I teach with was given the award of teacher of the year in the nation in our field. He does not have a doctorate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top