I think that Jesus was who He was and did not fit modern categories. I doubt that a Myers-Briggs could have been run on Him. Yes, I know about and agree with the affirmation that He was fully human; but in His uniqueness it seems to me that the either/or categories just will not work.
The question reminds me of Albert Schweitzer's doctoral thesis, "The Psychiatric Study of Jesus", in which he showed that efforts being made in his time to examine Jesus' mental profile were futile, if for no other reason than the severe limitations of time make it worthless to speculate about someone's psychological makeup. In addition, of course, there is the question of the selectivity of the sources and of the way the sources were shaped by the evangelists for their particular purposes. None of that gives us enough data to be able to make a valid guess.
