Were false teacher bought by the Lord?

2 Peter, chapter 2
1: But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
2: And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.
3: And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.


One poster said this was talking about Duet. 32: 6": Do ye thus requite the LORD, O foolish people and unwise? is not he thy father that hath bought thee? hath he not made thee, and established thee?

But this cannot be true for Peter was talking about in the time he was on the earth and those in Duet that were bought was by God and they were Israel. Now the false teachers and false prophets of Peter’s time were not Israel. I doubt if anyone would dare say so but I might get fooled.

Now if it is true the the Lord bought even the false prophets and false teachers then it would fit with the Scripture:

Hebrews, chapter 2

"9": But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man.
If this is true that Jesus died for all (and that is they must believe to receive it) then the doctrine of He only died for the "elect" is false.

 

Does that mean the "elect" can be lost?

 

The original Greek term despotēs designated simply "lord"

It was said by a poster that the Greek word in the original text was despotes and that it meant God or Father. Well it mean what is says in the Scripture of Peter 2:2 "Lord" in the original Greek. So the previous poster who said it meant father was wrong according to the Greek dictionary.

 

Don't seem to be anyone willing to answer the questions.

 

At least you admit it is Jesus that bought them and if they were false teachers and false prophets then He bought some that were not the "elect" according even to what you are saying and they were fit for swift destruction. So looks like some of the "elect" are going to be lost if Jesus only shed his blood for the "elect".:thumbs: Or He tasted death for every man as the Scripture says.

 

You put the word Jesus in there not me. I simply quoted you. The Scripture itself of which I posted says "Lord" but you said Jesus. It also says for sure they deny they were bought by the Lord. (not maybe but were bought) that is what you had in your posts so if you wrote it wrong then you should rewrite it. :wavey:

 

This is your direct quote about the buying and denying. You added (had they been what they claimed; true Christians) but you threw in an opinion of yours I only want Scripture. I took what was scripture and what you added who knows where that come from but it not Scripture or sound.:wavey:

 

I never said they were true Christians. I was saying if as you say, He only shed His blood for the "elect" then they would have to be "elect" for it says (He bought them).

He tasted death for every man. If you are going to mock someone then mock the Scripture for that is what it says along with this Scripture where He bought false prophets and false teachers.:thumbs:
My point all along is that He tasted death for every man but a man has to believe that He is the Christ to receive it.:type:

 

You just don't like a Scripture that goes against your belief I think anyway. Good night to you too.:sleeping_2: