Darron Steele
New Member
This is one reason I put up this poll. It plainly refutes that it takes fear of Hellfire to motivate every Christian.steaver said:You got it! :thumbs:
All of the christians I know that are OSAS camped love and serve the Lord. 100% of them and I know hundreds. In fact they weep at the thought of doing something of sin to dishonor our Lord. Yet every opponant of OSAS will always put in their plug that OSAS just wants to get away with sinning.
Exactly. It is a lie. It is a slanderous lie.steaver said:I have never confronted a christian who was out of fellowship with God, caught up in sin, (and I have confronted many) who said to me "Hey, OSAS right? So I can sin all I want!" . No, everytime I confronted a christian about their sin I was met with remorse and thankfulness that I was concerned for them. Never did I hear "who cares, I'm going to heaven anyway". True christians NEVER say OSAS so sin does not matter. Never! It is a lie preached over and over by the opponants of OSAS. ...
However, the implication of that attitude are as follows: `We follow the Lord out of compulsion, and if we would not go to Hell, we would not follow the Lord because we really do not want to.'
When confronted with the implications of that, people try to dodge the question, or help those they agree with dodge the question. However, the question is really simple: which is closest to your primary motivation to serve the Lord? As of now, the poll is 16-0 in favor of the second option.
Now, this does not a blanket statement of those who believe in forfeiture of salvation. The religious tenets themselves are not my concern here. Many who believe in forfeiture of salvation do not engage in slanderous behavior; many who believe in forfeiture of salvation still serve the Lord because they want to.
However, the `sharp tongues' have yet to vote their genuine attitudes now that the implications of their attitudes are plain. The second purpose of that poll was to see whether or not the `sharp tongues' would stand by their attitudes when the implications are that clear. Thus far they have not.
I got tired of seeing the slanderous lies against those who do not deserve it, especially when the `negative light' is more deserved by the slanderers. That is why I created this thread and this poll.
Last edited by a moderator: