WHICH version of Calvinism Is "Right" One Though?

[JesusFan]

Just curious to IF there is considered a "best" way to see the theological aspect of Calvinism?

Does it really matter regardless if one holds to Low/Moderate/High/Hyper view on it?

Just which version is the prominent view espoused by majority who post here on BB?

Is it considered to "all" be calvinist, or is there some more so than others?

 

[Osage Bluestem]

Supralapsarianism between moderate and high calvinism is the right formula. Any other position leaves inconsistancy and holes in ones theology.

 

[StefanM]

Supralapsarianism is the right one.

I vehemently disagree with this. Supralapsarianism requires that God create individuals for the purpose of sending them to hell.

 

[Van]

Oops, I misunderstood the topic, my bad.

 

[Jim1999]

supralapsarianism is deemed to by hyper-calvinism. The majority of baptists true to calvinism are generally sublapsarianist.

Supra is the theology of Beza. This has to do with the order of redemption preceeding the decree to permit the fall.

Cheers,

Jim

 

[ReformedBaptist]

Mine is best. :applause:

 

[JesusFan]

Mine is best. :applause:

Ah...
Did God Predestine you to post that, or why is totally by your own free will!

 

[percho]

Ah...
Did God Predestine you to post that, or why is totally by your own free will!

Sounds like a free will statement to me. I'm with you fellows.