White Nationalists Are Ecstatic About Jeff Sessions’ Nomination

[Crabtownboy]

Andrew Anglin, editor of the neo-Nazi site The Daily Stormer, wrote that Sessions’ nomination, along with the appointment of retired Gen. Mike Flynn as national security adviser and Steve Bannon as Trump’s chief strategist, is “like Christmas.”

“Of course, I was thinking of Sessions for either Secretary of State or Defense, but I think Trump is making a point by putting an aggressive anti-Black racist in as AG,” Anglin wrote. “It’s a corrective measure, after Obama turned the Justice Department into the Black Panthers.”

But even Anglin acknowledged that the very features that make Sessions an attractive pick to neo-Nazis might make Senate confirmation challenging.

“The reason he might face trouble? Because he’s a racist and most of these RINOs (Republican in Name Only) in Congress are filthy cuck traitors to the White race and the GOP,” Anglin wrote.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...out-jeff-sessions_us_582f75e2e4b099512f82d7f6

 

[kyredneck]

Would someone please explain to me what exactly is wrong with being a 'white nationalist'?

I think I might be one.....

 

[kyredneck]

....like, besides skin color, what's the difference between a white nationalist and a black nationalist?

 

[Crabtownboy]

....like, besides skin color, what's the difference between a white nationalist and a black nationalist?

No black nationalists are being appointed to Trump's cabinet.

Do you approve of his appointment of white nationalists?

 

[kyredneck]

You didn't answer the questions.

 

[Crabtownboy]

You didn't answer the questions.

Of course I did. You just did not like the way your question lead.

OK. Black nationalists have not lynched thousands of white Americans.

Do you approve of Trump's appointment of white supremacists?

 

[kyredneck]

Of course I did.

No. You did not.

You just did not like the way your question lead.

No. What I don't like is your deceit.

OK. Black nationalists have not lynched thousands of white Americans.

??? You haven't defined what you mean by 'nationalist'.

Do you approve of Trump's appointment of white supremacists?

What guile you have, trying to slip 'supremacists' in when the subject is 'nationalists'.

Once again, the questions were:

What exactly is wrong with being a 'white nationalist'?

Besides skin color, what's the difference between a white nationalist and a black nationalist?

 

[Salty]

Of course I did. You just did not like the way your question lead.

OK. Black nationalists have not lynched thousands of white Americans.

Do you approve of Trump's appointment of white supremacists?

You mean like Ayo Kimathi

But Crabby is right - Blacks nationalists dont lynch

 

[kyredneck]

You mean like Ayo Kimathi

But Crabby is right - Blacks nationalists dont lynch

So, you consider these to be 'nationalists'? Will you define what you think is a 'nationalist'?

If desiring your country to retain it's sovereignty is 'nationalist', then I am one, and I'm white to boot, and I've no idea what my skin color has to do with loving my country.

 

[Rob_BW]

So, you consider these to be 'nationalists'? Will you define what you think is a 'nationalist'?

If desiring your country to retain it's sovereignty is 'nationalist', then I am one, and I'm white to boot, and I've no idea what my skin color has to do with loving my country.

I guess it's a binary choice, one must be either a nationalist or a globalist.

 

[Don]

Andrew Anglin, editor of the neo-Nazi site The Daily Stormer, wrote that Sessions’ nomination, along with the appointment of retired Gen. Mike Flynn as national security adviser and Steve Bannon as Trump’s chief strategist, is “like Christmas.”

“Of course, I was thinking of Sessions for either Secretary of State or Defense, but I think Trump is making a point by putting an aggressive anti-Black racist in as AG,” Anglin wrote. “It’s a corrective measure, after Obama turned the Justice Department into the Black Panthers.”

But even Anglin acknowledged that the very features that make Sessions an attractive pick to neo-Nazis might make Senate confirmation challenging.

“The reason he might face trouble? Because he’s a racist and most of these RINOs (Republican in Name Only) in Congress are filthy cuck traitors to the White race and the GOP,” Anglin wrote.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...out-jeff-sessions_us_582f75e2e4b099512f82d7f6

CTB - while you're buying into the same sort of smear campaign Sessions faced in 1986, you might consider:

"For instance, he was one of the only Republican senators to support Eric Holder's nomination for attorney general.

As a U.S. Attorney he filed several cases to desegregate schools in Alabama. And he also prosecuted Klansman Henry Francis Hays, son of Alabama Klan leader Bennie Hays, for abducting and killing Michael Donald, a black teenager selected at random. Sessions insisted on the death penalty for Hays. When he was later elected the state Attorney General, Sessions followed through and made sure Hays was executed. The successful prosecution of Hays also led to a $7 million civil judgment against the Klan, effectively breaking the back of the KKK in Alabama."

 

[Yeshua1]

Andrew Anglin, editor of the neo-Nazi site The Daily Stormer, wrote that Sessions’ nomination, along with the appointment of retired Gen. Mike Flynn as national security adviser and Steve Bannon as Trump’s chief strategist, is “like Christmas.”

“Of course, I was thinking of Sessions for either Secretary of State or Defense, but I think Trump is making a point by putting an aggressive anti-Black racist in as AG,” Anglin wrote. “It’s a corrective measure, after Obama turned the Justice Department into the Black Panthers.”

But even Anglin acknowledged that the very features that make Sessions an attractive pick to neo-Nazis might make Senate confirmation challenging.

“The reason he might face trouble? Because he’s a racist and most of these RINOs (Republican in Name Only) in Congress are filthy cuck traitors to the White race and the GOP,” Anglin wrote.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...out-jeff-sessions_us_582f75e2e4b099512f82d7f6

Why do you lie about him then? What proof do you have that he is racist?
Or is it just that he feels that America should do a better job than under President Obama regime?

 

[Yeshua1]

CTB - while you're buying into the same sort of smear campaign Sessions faced in 1986, you might consider:

"For instance, he was one of the only Republican senators to support Eric Holder's nomination for attorney general.

As a U.S. Attorney he filed several cases to desegregate schools in Alabama. And he also prosecuted Klansman Henry Francis Hays, son of Alabama Klan leader Bennie Hays, for abducting and killing Michael Donald, a black teenager selected at random. Sessions insisted on the death penalty for Hays. When he was later elected the state Attorney General, Sessions followed through and made sure Hays was executed. The successful prosecution of Hays also led to a $7 million civil judgment against the Klan, effectively breaking the back of the KKK in Alabama."

That is the standard way liberals work, as the just throw out rumours and lies , and hop people by it! As oneof Presient Obams advisers stated, Saul Lewinski, just make abig lie and say it a lot!

 

[InTheLight]

CTB, read and learn:

The media wants you to think Jeff Sessions is some sort of Alabamian unrepentant racist, but in fact Jeff Sessions has a long history of fighting segregation in Alabama, seeking the death penalty for KKK members, and marching with civil rights leaders to commemorate and honor the 50th anniversary of the march at Selma.

http://theresurgent.com/seriously-trump-the-pictures-of-jeff-sessions-they-dont-want-you-to-see/

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo

 

[kyredneck]

I guess it's a binary choice, one must be either a nationalist or a globalist.

Nationalist as opposed to subjugation by the globalists is exactly as I mean it, but that's NOT the way CTB intends it. Nationalist to CTB is a hateful, prejudiced white guy wearing a white wife beater, or something along those lines.

 

[Benjamin]

White Nationalist Feelings Matter?

I don't expect CTB to ever be able to articulate his opposition to one being white or a nationalist as he goes about his only "defense" which is to bear false witness against those in opposition to his globalist ideology by calling them racists. .

 

[Crabtownboy]

So, you consider these to be 'nationalists'? Will you define what you think is a 'nationalist'?

If desiring your country to retain it's sovereignty is 'nationalist', then I am one, and I'm white to boot, and I've no idea what my skin color has to do with loving my country.

Jeff Sessions quotes:



I doubt you can be a white nationalist and not be a white supremacists also.

White nationalismis an ideology that advocates a racial definition of national identity.[1]Proponents of the ideology identify with and are attached to the concept of a white nation.[2]It ranges from a preference for one's specific white ethnic group, to feelings of superiority, including calls for national citizenship to be reserved forwhite people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_nationalism


White supremacy or white supremacism is a racist ideology centered upon the belief, and promotion of the belief, that white people are superior in certain characteristics, traits, and attributes to people of other racial backgrounds and that therefore white people should politically, economically and socially rule non-white people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_supremacy

 

[Don]

Jeff Sessions quotes:

I doubt you can be a white nationalist and not be a white supremacists also.

Source, please. I've done a couple of quick searches, and can't find this.

 

[kyredneck]

I doubt you can be a white nationalist and not be a white supremacists also.

There's something insidious with conflating 'nationalist' with 'supremacist', as in a subtle programming to put an unsavory light on patriotism. It stinks.

na·tion·al·ist
ˈnaSH(ə)nələst/
noun
noun: nationalist; 1. a person who advocates political independence for a country.

 

[Squire Robertsson]

True, but the label (wn) has been in use with this meaning since the at least the 60s. WS goes back even further. WN, IIRC was first used by ws organizations to describe them selves. It wasn't something the SPLC invented by themselves.

There's something insidious with conflating 'nationalist' with 'supremacist', as in a subtle programming to put an unsavory light on patriotism. It stinks. SNIP