• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

White-On-White Crime Strikes Again In Waco

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The other white-on-white crime thread has gone so far afield and become so irrational it should be closed and the discussion begun anew. We can hope it will stay on topic and remain rational. Is anyone holding their breath?

Following a spate of white-on-white violence over the weekend in Waco, Texas, that claimed nine lives and resulted in scores of casualties and over 190 arrests, there has been a marked lack of interest in talking about where the event fits into the epidemic of such white criminal behavior in the U.S. -- despite the fact that every year, more white people are murdered by white people than by any other group.

In recent years, a national pattern has begun to emerge in the wake of shootings in which a black man is killed by a white man. Of course the death is a tragedy, goes the narrative, but the dead man probably provoked the killing somehow -- and more importantly, if you truly care about young black men, why aren't you more concerned about black-on-black violence?

The same pattern doesn't hold even when white-on-white crime unfolds in full view of the nation, as it did in the parking lot of the Twin Peaks Restaurant on Sunday.

Yet white-on-white crime should be a huge concern -- because it’s out of control. Granted, there are 201 thugs off the streets for the time being, but what about the rest of them?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/18/waco-texas-biker-gang_n_7307050.html
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't see how the Democrats can call it white-on-white crime when it was a fight between various criminal gangs. They don't call it white-on-white crime when a New York crime boss murders another New York crime boss, do they?
 

wpe3bql

Member
I don't see how the Democrats can call it white-on-white crime when it was a fight between various criminal gangs. They don't call it white-on-white crime when a New York crime boss murders another New York crime boss, do they?

C M G---You're not implying that the Libs have a double standard about anything, are you?? :thumbsup:
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't see how the Democrats can call it white-on-white crime when it was a fight between various criminal gangs. They don't call it white-on-white crime when a New York crime boss murders another New York crime boss, do they?

Well CMG if you ain't [sic] white you can't be a member of the gangs that were in Texas last weekend. You ever hear of a black Hell's Angel; a white Pagan; a white Bandido? No you haven't.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well CMG if you ain't [sic] white you can't be a member of the gangs that were in Texas last weekend. You ever hear of a black Hell's Angel; a white Pagan; a white Bandido? No you haven't.

Well, just like Hillary you can talk dialect, huh? Why do you have the "sic" since you wrote it yourself--that is to be inserted when someone else writes something?

Seriously, are you saying that one gang member can commit a crime against another gang member and it is white-on-white crime? That is to funny--it is mob violence by organized crime. When you left the movie theatre after seeing The Godfather, did you tell your friends that the movie was about white-on-white crime?
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well, just like Hillary you can talk dialect, huh? Why do you have the "sic" since you wrote it yourself--that is to be inserted when someone else writes something?

Wrong. Simply showing that I understand 'ain't' is not proper language.

Seriously, are you saying that one gang member can commit a crime against another gang member and it is white-on-white crime? That is to funny--it is mob violence by organized crime. When you left the movie theatre after seeing The Godfather, did you tell your friends that the movie was about white-on-white crime?

Were the gang members both white?

Haven't see the Godfather. Why would I, nothing of redeeming value in that story/movie.
 

Eric B

Active Member
Site Supporter
I don't see how the Democrats can call it white-on-white crime when it was a fight between various criminal gangs. They don't call it white-on-white crime when a New York crime boss murders another New York crime boss, do they?
The whole point of that article (that is, the way it is framed) is to spoof what people are saying about "black on black" crime. It's satirical.
Here's another one, framed in terms of the other common phrase: "destroying their own community":
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/18/biker-gangs-shootout-waco_n_7305706.html
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Just want to point out that if you look through the mug shots that have been made public so far, you'll see a few men of African descent (probably African-American) and quite a few Hispanic folks. There are persons of several ethnicities involved, although I have not seen any persons of obvious Asian/Pacific Rim descent. It would not surprise me to see that though.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Wrong. Simply showing that I understand 'ain't' is not proper language.



Were the gang members both white?

Haven't see the Godfather. Why would I, nothing of redeeming value in that story/movie.

Here is what the leftist encyclopedia Wikipedia says about sic:

The Latin adverb sic ("thus"; in full: sic erat scriptum, "thus was it written")[1] inserted immediately after a quoted word or passage, indicates that the quoted matter has been transcribed exactly as found in the source text, complete with any erroneous or archaic spelling, surprising assertion, faulty reasoning, or other matter that might otherwise be taken as an error of transcription.

The notation's usual purpose is to inform the reader that any errors or apparent errors in quoted material do not arise from errors in the course of the transcription, but are intentionally reproduced, exactly as they appear in the source text. It is generally placed inside square brackets, to signal that it is not part of the quoted matter; and is traditionally printed in italics, as is customary with foreign words.

Sic may also be used derisively, to call attention to the original writer's spelling mistakes or erroneous logic.[2]

Oh, you would like Godfather--it is about the mafia. It is called gang violence not white on white crime. But to go onto another example, no one ever called the Valentine's Day Massacre white on white etc--it was called gang violence.

Liberals just have to play around with the race question all the time because that is all they have.

As Hillary runs, we will be hearing a lot about sexism, because in her case that is all the Democrats have--her gender and her fabulous wealth.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Just want to point out that if you look through the mug shots that have been made public so far, you'll see a few men of African descent (probably African-American) and quite a few Hispanic folks. There are persons of several ethnicities involved, although I have not seen any persons of obvious Asian/Pacific Rim descent. It would not surprise me to see that though.

I am sorry but you will have to take this post down because the author has stated that the gang members were all white.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
Well CMG if you ain't [sic] white you can't be a member of the gangs that were in Texas last weekend. You ever hear of a black Hell's Angel; a white Pagan; a white Bandido? No you haven't.

Yes I have.
You're an idiot, and a racist.
And you don't know beans about biker gangs.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
Just want to point out that if you look through the mug shots that have been made public so far, you'll see a few men of African descent (probably African-American) and quite a few Hispanic folks. There are persons of several ethnicities involved, although I have not seen any persons of obvious Asian/Pacific Rim descent. It would not surprise me to see that though.
Because you aren't a racist.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Just want to point out that if you look through the mug shots that have been made public so far, you'll see a few men of African descent (probably African-American) and quite a few Hispanic folks. There are persons of several ethnicities involved, although I have not seen any persons of obvious Asian/Pacific Rim descent. It would not surprise me to see that though.

Every mugshot that I've seen released is either of a white person or a white Hispanic person.

7807362_G.jpg


Part of the released mugshots.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
So he's a Black Hawaiian ?

Help me out. I'm just trying to lump all my hyphenated people in the acceptable racial group.


And no fair editing your post after I quoted it.

Your post indicates he is multi-ethnic. Why call him black ? I got cousins darker than him.


Careful, or your meme might fall apart.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Zaac

Well-Known Member
So he's a Black Hawaiian ?

Nope. He's Black. Ask his wife. He understands that America isn't as post-racial as folks like to believe and that if he calls himself white, there is a segment of the population that would deny it till Jesus came back.

The fact of the matter is there are white people out there who would kill or attempt to kill him because of the color of his skin. I doubt there are any black folks who would do that.

He's black.:thumbs:
 
Top